nobody

There is a clear correlation between a lot of touches and getting injured. RBs clearly get injured at a higher rate after 370+ carry seasons than average injury numbers. It's a pretty well known phenomenon.

Please answer how you post with your tongue in Trump's ass. Your eyeballs have to be jammed right up against his bloated ass cheeks. Did you get a neuralink installed or something?

Oh. So we're just making stuff up about people and going to pretend it's true or something? I thought you were trying to make a joke. It was lame. It happens. But if we're now taking stupid, made up accusations seriously, I'll respond. I obviously have never raped a teen, so there was nothing to get away with. Now you... How did you get away with sewing your mouth to Trump's ass? How can you even type with your tongue jammed in his ?

Never did see the howard stern appeal. He was like the original social media prankster guy doing inappropriate stuff for rage bait.

Well your master did tell you guys to stop, and you licked those boots like a good boy and shut right up, so who's left to talk about it? Well you shut up about epstein except to say "what about Biden?" a thousand times.

Haha. So great that trump is getting away with raping teens. Amiright? Smoke em if you got em boys! :high-five:

Oh no. Will he take the gloves off!?!

You could easily get guerrendo, so he shouldn't be a league loser. You could also get my favorite rookie sleeper Corey Kiner, but mum's the word on that.

Agreed. I'm not a fan of the product, but there is no reason to be disrespectful to the players.

This thread is really giving me concern about Barkley. Way too many people are just sure that Barkley will be just as good as last year since he was so good last year like people don't have up and down years or something. No player has had consecutive 2000 yard seasons. Only nine players including Barkley have had a single 2000 yard season. It's madness to assume Barkley is just going to repeat that career year.

None. I only watch porn with my parents.

Mannequin, and me and my brother got kicked out for bringing a bag of snacks in.

17k likes is a decent amount. Not every person in the world is on twitter. Not every person in the world saw the post. Not every person in the world that saw the post and potentially think nazis are awesome would be compelled to hit a like button. So all the dismissiveness related to the percentage of the world 17k is is misplaced. I hate social media. It's poison. For all the good things the Internet brings, one of the worst things it does is give dumb people, grifters, bigots, wokies, and yes even racists a giant megaphone. This is an example of that. Not sure why people feel compelled to deflect and defend.

Bingo... People change their whole belief system. It ain't because they just decided to. We've all seen it and we know why it happens.

I don't consider helping them pay for education being run by them. I just said I think they run you. You are the one that said they don't run you because as you said you don't give them money even though now you say you do give them money. But it isn't about how much money you give them. My perception of you is your kids run you and in the context of horseman's suggestion that you could've given them a loan and paid you interest instead of a bank, my perception is they would never pay you back and you wouldn't enforce it because they run you just like rusty is run by his female.

You are giving them the money. Didn't you say you "co-invested" with them? Didn't you say you pay for your kids education? Or were you just saying stuff again?

I'm pretty sure his kids run him. Probably how he became a wokie. He'd end up paying them interest for the money he's loaning them.

I'd caveat that. You need to study something real. Going in there for some liberal arts degree and expecting ROI is a sub optimal strategy.

McLaurin reportedly told to pound sand on his trade request https://www.rotowire.com/football/player/terry-mclaurin-13536 Team not meeting trade request August 1, 2025 The Commanders don't appear interested in dealing McLaurin (ankle), who requested a trade Thursday, according to Nicki Jhabvala and Diana Russini of The Athletic. ANALYSIS The Commanders may not want to meet McLaurin's price in extension negotiations, but they've reportedly shut down other teams that have inquired about a trade. It's a tricky situation, as he turns 30 in September and is drastically underpaid relative to his 2024 production (now in the final season of a three-year, $68.3 million contract, with a $15.5 million base salary for 2025). He rightfully expects a massive raise on his next deal, while the Commanders may be hesitant to sign an extension with large guarantees through his age-32/33 seasons. After holding out from June minicamp and the first few days of training camp, McLaurin reported to the team this past weekend but has been absent from practice due to an ankle injury. It's not clear whether the ankle is a real concern, as all reports so far are pointing to money and security as the real issues at hand for the soon-to-be 30-year-old wideout. ----------------------------------------- I don't necessarily agree with "rightfully" expecting a massive raise on his next deal. He's an above average receiver - good not great, and he's getting old. expecting more than say three year 75 million would be a stretch to me. Tyreek is the only 30 year old receiver making over 20M a year and the Dolphins probably regret it. Hell, Devante Adams is only making $12M (he has $28M coming next year, but he'll be cut).

It is true though.

I don't understand the money laundering. If Trump bought the house for $40M and then sold it for $95M, wouldn't Trump be the one laundering the money? This would be the Hunter Biden art scam. You want to give money to someone so you buy something off them for more than it's worth essentially laundering the money. If Trump was a front laundering the money the transaction should be reversed, no?

8.08 Jayden Reed Under Consideration: Deebo Samuel This pick was strictly, "I'm picking the best guy I think won't be here in the next round." I didn't think there was really a tantalizing option in the 8th round. Still a ton of QBs available that I didn't see much difference in, and I happened to like a guy I was supremely confident would be there in the 9th. That left me the option of taking the guy I know would be here in the 9th or reaching for someone. In hindsight, it might have made sense to just reach for the lottery ticket guys I wasn't really thinking about here. Guys like Pearsall, Michael Pittman, Egbuka I think all have a decent shot to pop, but would've been reaches. At this point in the draft, I don't usually start stocking up on my lottery tickets, so I went with the useful WR3/WR4 without real upside to be more than that.

I don't doubt they ignored evidence. They want this to go away so bad. And therefore it will unfortunately.

7.05 Tyrone Tracy Under Consideration: Brian Robinson I didn't like much of the value in the 7th, but there were ostensibly two starting runningbacks available, so that was my focus. I know Singletary is still there, but my perception was there was a clear shift toward Tracy last year. I don't have sky high hopes here. I see Tracy as a plodder with limited upside, but at the time of this pick, I expected him to get 12-15 touches a game. Although, now I'm reading Skattebo is showing well in Giants camp, I wish I would've targeted Skat later as well to pair up with Tracy. I actually had a slight preference for Brian Robinson, but I thought Robinson had a better chance of slipping into the 8th... didn't happen.

Let me touch on this more. Think about your job. SW programmer, IT professional, lawyer, fry cook like seafoam. You're an expert at what you do right? Take SW programming or IT especially. How often can you write some software or setup a network or change some network setting, etc., and not test that it works by verifying what you did is correct? You need that fail/fix feedback loop to get stuff like this right. And you are an expert! I work with 100 SW experts. And guess what? Not a single one of them can write a simple calculator program and have it work on the first try without some sort of fail/fix loop. Well, with these models, there is no fail/fix loop. They predict something will happen in 10 or 20 years, and there is no feedback loop to say "yeah, that was right (or wrong)" because by the time 10 years rolls around, that model is abandoned for some new model, and no one is jumping up and down to talk about the flaws in their 10 year old model anyway. And yeah I know they probably backtest their models, but that is notoriously the wrong way to do things. All that does is say 1. what happened in the past was captured well, and 2. what happened in the past will happen in the future. both of which are incorrect.