nobody

You're missing the point as usual. No you couldn't move to Central Park. You couldn't defend it. The point he is making is that complaining about colonizing is stupid. Throughout history, the weak are defeated by the strong. The difference now is people don't realize that and we're allowing our would be invaders to simply move in because we want to be "nice.". We're essentially allowing people to complain their way into power. It's truly bizarre. The funny thing is if africa had the means to conquer europe they would have. Europeans really need to start owning it when people cry about colonization. The answer should be, "yep. They should've fought better."

I would do the trade for what it's worth

It's a fair trade. Nix is serviceable, but London is a huge upgrade over Metcalf.

Yes. He's been grifting for years.

That was going before he got dementia and executed by his crackhead son

I'm listening to a podcast called "this is football" by Kevin Clark. I like clark because he makes sharp points. I rarely hear him say things like, "it just is" which is the hallmark signal to me that someone is either unprepared or doesn't know what they are talking about. Anyway, he's got Allen Robinson on and they're talking about what he learned from Sean mcvay who I grant is probably an actual genius, but listening to Robinson, one of the things mcvay did to revolutionize the game was make defenses defend multiple options. Robinson talks about how he has the receivers line up such that the spacing doesn't allow the defense to eliminate route possibilities and he gave the example of having outside receivers line up more inside so the defense has to defend out routes (obviously if you're very far outside, you don't have room to run an out). That's smart of course, but my question is this? Are football coaches retarded? Why haven't teams always made an effort not to tip their routes? Why haven't they always disguised the play with multiple plays off of same formations? To me, this is obvious stuff. Why wouldn't teams always do it? I literally built playbooks in Madden that were made to disguise plays back when I was in high school.

Chargers ran a version of this. Except they didn't do the push. Instead had the tightened motion in and sneak.

He ain't wrong. You pulled the gutterboy and looked that shìt up and then acted like you already knew it.

No worries guys. He says he feels great. He feels so great they won't let him practice. I guess they're just lying right to our faces now.

I guess worthy didn't like Swift's last album. Kelce laid him out. Looks like he dinged up his right shoulder.

My opinion is my call. But if Trump falls backward into the right result, I'm okay with that in this instance. You guys are acting like the constitution is going straight in the trash because the president wants to sway funding. That's a gray area at best. What you should be railing against is Trump using his position to single out for punitive action institutions, agencies, states, etc. that he perceives did him wrong. Get off the constitution thing. It's not a winner in this instance. Too bad you guys didn't fight as hard against the covid jab mandates you were supposedly against as hard as you're fighting for Harvard not to have to spend their own money on their own research. That's a great gig. Become a well known college. Get alumni in positions of power that can influence where money is allocated. Have money allocated to "research" at your university so you don't ever have to dip into your own funds. If a corporation did that, you guys would be pissed as hell.

Poor harvard. Cant afford to do their super critical research with tax dollars.

I don't give a flying fock about red and blue. Clinton is in those files too. I want people who abused tennage girls in jail. Whoever is in charge needs to do it. Why anyone thought the sh¡tbag wokies would do it is laughable, but the supposed party of morals should be doing it. But of course all the monkeys wearing red just want to win the argument.

The fact that harvard is even fighting so hard for this money should tell you they shouldn't have it. Just another boondoggle. School has a 53 billion dollar endowment and crying poor and can't do research.

DOGE cut the people auditing Harvard's federal grant money spending? Tell me more.

Okay, since we're so worried about the constitution in this matter... I know there are laws that must show the money was spent only on the research. The money must be allocated with fair bidding practices. Can we see the audits of the spending to make sure it wasn't wasted? Because we want to follow the laws right? I'm all about this. Let's follow the laws and watch everyone go to jail.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. I don't see how the Biden cabal not wanting to blow up the power brokers pulling their strings and trump not wanting to blow up the same power brokers influencing him means the AG is incompetent. Perhaps you can connect the dots for me.

Dead nuts on. The money is for scientific breakthroughs! Spoken like the gullible chump that he is never met one of these career academics that float from grant to grant never producing sh¡t.

A wokie is lecturing me on good uses of money. You were cool with shutting down the economy over covid like a fool. We don't need your opinion on the economy. Not sure why you aren't too embarrassed to give it to be honest.

They'll easily win 6 games. I wouldn't be surprised if they beat Cincy this weekend. In fact I'm picking it.

It's defying the constitution to not give money to Harvard? I don't care about their admission policies. They don't need money from taxpayers. end of story.

Yep. mutually assured destruction. Whoever had their hand up Biden's ass running the country didn't want that smoke either.

Fock Harvard. They don't need money from the government. Let's not act like that isn't some kickback BS.

I don't know if incompetence is all that simple of an explanation if you're trying to apply Occam's razor. To get that AG job, you have to be incredibly politically and media savvy. These people conveniently becoming stupid when it comes to handling public perception and spin doesn't seem all that simple to me. To me the simplest explanation is Trump spoke with a superficial knowledge of what was happening as usual. AG was like, "Cool. Let's release what we have." Someone from Trump's team reviewed the info to be released and saw it dripping with Trump references among references to other powerful people. Assistant goes back to Trump and says, "yeah, this is bad." Trump then says, "I'll instruct my lemmings to ignore it." Then BAM... an army of seafoams immediately stop caring about old men raping teens and lick those trump boots until they shine. I guess Trump is involved so it's hard to have cohesive messaging when Trump is whipsawing his policy back and forth.

Bro, just say "take" or "usurp" if you want to be fancy.