nobody

I have empathy for the shìtbags getting fired, but that's also like saying you have empathy for a murderer getting sentenced to jail time. Yes, that definitely sucks, and I definitely understand that it sucks, but if it's exactly what you deserve I'm not going to be torn up about it.

Great question. Republicans would likely prefer to get rid of him, but Trump is to egomaniacal and not as easy to manipulate as Biden, so the right won't be able to get him to quit.

No one would bother killing Harris. They would just replace her with the next politician off the assembly line with the exact same policies.

That explains your political leanings.

My perspective is they're saving him for the playoffs.

Agreed, at least Diontae has a chance of being productive as a spot starter with Dalton.

The NFL must've sent a memo to teams that they can't dìck around with the injury reports after the 49ers pulled their Shanahanigans with McCaffery

We have pretty regular layoffs. We have so many shìtbags, though, I love when they happen. I'd fire these bastards gleefully. "Yep, we're finally getting rid of your grifting ass. Time to take your fraud down the road. Hopefully you become homeless, you piece of shìt." I don't get why people get so broken up about these clowns. We fired one guy that I had to kick off my program because not only was he a waste of space, he was actively keeping other people from getting work done. The same team lead I told to drop him was telling me that he was trying to find another role for him. I about freaked the fūck out. I was telling him, "don't go saddle some other department with this guy." He says, "but he's been here for 30 years," and I say, "yeah, and he should've been fired 20 years ago. Think about the people who all have to do extra work to make up for him."

I guess it's the Carson Steele era in KC.

Once again, I see rhetoric on both sides. One side's rhetoric is targeted at a man. The other is targeted at a policy. The point of the post, once again, is that the analogous outlandish statements on the right aren't as coordinated and distributed. "Trump is a threat to democracy" has been the message for two straight years.

Once again, you are correct that both sides have use the media to spread messaging. That is 100% correct. On one side, the message is "too much uncontrolled immigration is bad because it will cause increase in crime. Illegal immigration must be stopped." On the other side, "it's Trump is going to install himself as dictator and must be stopped." So I guess, is the point of this comparison that it's okay to inflame violence against trump (all while saying violence isn't okay, of course) because there is probably increased violence against illegal immigrants? My point is rhetoric on the left is leading directly to attempts on Trump's life. Your point seems to be that it's okay since the right uses rhetoric, too, but rhetoric that a policy must change is a little different than rhetoric that this one guy is going to end democracy leading people to try to kill him. That's my point.

Yes. But again that's different than, "Kamala will be a dictator."

Try to read it again. But yeah, let's take the pet eating as an example. That was a coordinated message. Not "Kamala is going to become a dictator and must be stopped."

They would use poors instead of themselves of course.

Not precisely. The difference is everyone knows that trump is hyperbolic, and secondly when Trump makes some outlandish claim, it's usually only Trump. The left is far more organized in their messaging and use the media to disseminate that message. So on the right, it's Trump riffing, and on the left it's a coordinate campaign with the backing and constant amplification by the media. So yeah, you can find examples, especially of trump, where the right says something that'll get people riled up for a minute. On the left, though, it's a steady coordinated drum beat that is amplified and repeated over and over in order to brainwash the army. And it's obviously working. That's why you hear the jokes that the lefty's got their new programming. You guys all fall right in line with whatever The Party messaging is almost immediately. You guys are very well trained.

I find the "it's both sides" folks in regards to rhetoric amusing. No one is is trying to take shots at Biden or Kamala.

Kneel this ball Houston!!! Don't give this opportunistic d a chance!

DJ Moore so disappointed in that last pass, I thought he was going to fake an injury.

Come on refs you can make Caleb look better than this. Get him that TD!!!

I would also like to state that intentional grounding is stupid. Why can't a QB throw a ball a way? Dumb.

I guess they realized they can't get away with something that obvious. Flag drops late.

Clear intentional grounding not called on caleb

Umps correctly ruled the roughness was perfectly necessary.

That wasn't contact to the head on kmet was it?

As the prophecy states.