nobody

He seems like he'd be down to fight. I wonder if I could bait him into a fight. I always dreamed of fighting a celebrity that thinks he's a bad ass just to see if I could win. Samuel L Jackson is like the main one that I've dreamed of fighting, but Andrew could work. Or maybe Joe Pesci, but I think he's so small it wouldn't be much of fight.

If you're watching a live football game, what would they do during the breaks? I guess just put an Amazon logo up?

Okay, horseman. I never did understand why people liked this dude. Same as George Carlin. Oooh, I said bad words. Look how funny I am!

And nothing will come of it. For those that don't want to watch it, it's one of those sting operations where they go on a date with someone and secretly film them as they talk about all the dirty shìt they do abusing their positions. The senior covid response official starts off by saying he had drug fueled sex parties during covid. Then he admits that the vax policies were intended to extort people into getting jabbed.

Dude really thought now he was a huge star and played sold out arenas multiple times a week. Okay, Andrew.

I remember the old Obama line of, "they didn't build that" and I get that he was talking about roads and infrastructure, but here's the thing, neither you nor the people he was talking to at the time built that either. You are not a leader. You are not a visionary. You can't take an abstract idea and bring it to life by clearly articulating the what and how. You can probably follow instructions. You can probably understand an idea that has been explained to you, but you can't come up with the idea. And even if you could, you wouldn't have the passion and energy to drive the execution. That's why they're wealthy and we're not. We don't have the vision, the drive, the execution, the risk tolerance, the intuition, etc. They do, and that's why they make the money. We follow instructions like monkeys while they apply the critical thought on what those instructions should be. And I know you think you can do all the stuff they do, but you can't. All of our lives have been lived thousands and thousands of times before. We are not special. We are not exceptional. We are not unique. They are. We are fungible. We can find multitudes of people to fill out roles. So when someone complains that they make too much money, understand that we can't do what they do. Very few can.

Wait. Do you not support Cheney's endorsement or something?

Bro's relationship might be getting rocky. That stuff will kill an athlete's mental

I guess I'll throw my hat in the prediction ring Steele due to between the tackles and goaline work Then perine due to passing game upside Then hunt just in case he's not washed and can come in and be a 3 down back

That's a good point. The reason PPR came along was because managers that were able to draft Tomlinson, Priest Holmes, Shaun Alexander, Jamaal Charles, Arian Foster, etc. they had such a huge advantage. PPR intended to balance the scoring a bit even though now it's too skewed to receivers. We should tweak the QB scoring such that QBs get the same number of points for rushing yards as passing yards.

Hold your team accountable for the dramatic "Trump is a threat to democracy" rhetoric instead of standing on the sideline while your team just keeps trying to rationalize it because Trump said Haitians eat cats.

Yep. Most people don't even realize they're being influenced. You're finally starting to get it.

I don't think that high of him, but he'll definitely get the goal line work, and they seem to like these physical guys.

So far, in this small sample size, he appears to be much worse on the road.

I influenced them, obviously, since I said it before them. Sup, JD! DM me if you need any fantasy advice.

Dude doesn't realize he's influenced by it.

It's surprising to me how people don't get how this stuff works. Why do you guys think the people with the most money usually win? They can buy more ads to manipulate people.

Probably. But he apparently was reprogrammed by "Trump is going to take away democracy"

And you still don't get it. The red team media arm isn't picking up Trump's ramblings. That's a key piece. You need the propaganda machine to pick it up and program all the NPCs.

My new dream is to fight to death a king. Preferably one that I can be at relatively easily.

Dumb. It's a two party system. Taking away a vote for one is like gaining a vote for the other.

You guys still don't get. Marketing 101 lesson for you. You program people through repeated messaging. You ever notice that many commercials don't really say anything about the product? They just put something on the screen to make you look and then they show a logo and some slogan. The commercial is meant to program the viewer to associate the brand with something interesting. The key is it's repeated over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over. And you can tell it's coordinated by The Party because their media arm always uses extremely similar language. It's clearly a concerted effort to program viewers with a certain message. So who cares about 1 guy saying something about killing Harris. That's in the noise. It's not being picked up by the red team media arm and repeated over and over and over and over and over. And here's marketing lesson 102. The most effective ways to program are by manipulating a person through fear or love. That's why the "Trump is a threat to democracy" is such a wonderfully crafted program. It goes straight to people's fear. Hell, half of you here have clearly bought into it. It's also why the immigration thing about eating pets is pretty good. It's plays on both fear and love. The difference is that with the immigration programming, it's saying the immigration policy is scary although I'd also expect it to lead to increased violence against immigrants if it gets a chance to take hold. The trump will take away democracy program focuses people's fear on one person. It's not about attacking his policies. It's attacking him as a person in that he's evil and "must be stopped."

I get these notifications and it's always some nerd in one of these threads giving me the, "well, actually, technically here's a study I found that shows there's a corner case out there that has nothing to do with the overall point..." Guys, people weren't actively stalking presidential candidates until trump. Tell your team to stop spreading the rhetoric about him killing democracy if you want it to stop. Or don't. I don't really care if trump gets shot anyway. Just stop claiming your team's highly effective programming campaign has nothing to do with it.

This is why I could never be a politician. You have to speak with such precision or people will deliberately miss the point to distract. Then instead of having my press secretary nicely explain why people doing that are retarded, I'd laugh in their face in move on. Although I guess it's not really retarded. It's pretty effective. Parse out the words and argue over semantics so you don't ever have to acknowledge the actual point. You feel good about the gotcha moment and you don't have to actually acknowledge any issues.

I'm pretty sure it ain't going to be Palmer. I was a huge advocate of his, but I realize while he's great at getting open, he doesn't seem to have the ability to get open on time and be in the right spot while doing so. He appears to get open by just going where the defender isn't and not by making the defender commit to moving out of position in order to create separation and be where the QB expects him to be. I think that's why Herbert, who usually is quite accurate always seems to miss him on every other throw while hitting every other receiver right in the chest.