Pimpadeaux

Violent crime down. Inflation down. Gas prices down. Dow hitting records. Unemployment near record lows. GDP is up. Manufacturing investment up. Wages growing. Consumer confidence up. You could link to this stuff all day, and MAGAturds would deny it without actually looking at anything.

Dude who got 217 COVID shots doing just fine. https://www.yahoo.com/news/happened-man-got-217-coronavirus-053202508.html

As long as that spectrum is limited to what far-right, angry, middle-aged white males see through their keyhole.

This was a crassic case of infoslamming uninformed MAGAturds. Gepetto says he got his information from some unnamed sourced and then backed it up with HT saying it was so. HT doesn't link to anything, either, because that's what he does, and he suggests looking it up, which I did. I found a clear-cut example of an independent candidate who lost in the primaries. He ran in every state as an independent for president. Gepetto pivots(gish gallops) and trumpets the red map in an attempt to derail the conversation's central point, which was that a primary loser can go on to run as an independent for president in the general election. I find not much out there regarding sore-loser laws other than a flimsy wiki link that notes that there are state sore-loser laws out there, including an opinion that they don't apply to presidential candidates. HT and Gepetto grasp at whatever straws they have left in a losing attempt to save face by pointing out that it was just one guy's opinion. Those law sure didn't apply when John Anderson ran as an independent in 1980. I never said these laws didn't exist. I just challenged these two knuckleheads to post some information about it, which they could not. HT and his little toadie Gepetto get pwned again.

PIMPADEAUX WINS AGAIN!

Donald Hitler.

You're basing your opinion on HT and a "news" source you refuse to link. BUT THAT'S WERT THEY WERES SAYING ON DER NERWS!

These so-called "sore loser" laws are obscure, squishy legislations that are in question, and this is the best you two clowns can come up with, particularly after the Supreme Court's recent unanimous vote? I'm dying here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sore_loser_law How do my sh!t peanuts taste?

Link to this "news." Source yo' sh!t. I don't see anything that indicates what you and HT are claiming. All day long posters hear beyatch about the weak-minded falling for fake news. I posted an actual example of a dude who lost in the primaries and ran in the general election. Show me an actual law that says they can't do this anymore.

It shows John Anderson ran in the general election, in addition to the link I provided showing that he ran in the primaries. Waiting ...

I'm still waiting for you to produce a link to any information regarding a primary candidate not being able to run in the general election as an independent. My trumpeting of the Haley victory in Vermont is a good, as is my American Samoa goof. But, you take HT's word for it that a primary candidate can't run in the general election as an independent. Looking forward to seeing that proof, boyo.

John Anderson was on the general-election ballot everywhere, and he took part in the primaries. How do you explain this, boyo? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_United_States_presidential_election https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries

My joke was that American Samoa lacked political significance, and now you're all in with the American Samoa vote. Consult your boyo HT on facts. Great idea.

HALEY WINS VERMONT!

Oh, so you're going to take his word for it. No links. No facts.

American Samoa is too close to call.

You should find a more accurate information source, boyo. This one was wrong. I posted an example.

Much like the non-mythical tie between ignorance and his painful stupidity.

You should provide links to facts to support your point. Pro tip.

He's such a man child. Waaaaah, muh D.C. .

You got a link to that rule? https://www.quora.com/Can-a-candidate-run-for-President-as-independent-after-losing-the-Republican-or-Democratic-primaries

Maine and Masschusetts too early to call!

Followed by this information after you got stuck at the asterisk and satisfied you could whatabout your way around facts:

I do not share this catastrophized paranoia in regard to all these entities working together to brainwash people. That would require unity, which we certainly don't have on any level regarding this playing field. Sure, the media has become polarized and biased, and that's a shame. They pander to what their audiences want to hear. Anyone on either side of the political spectrum who blindly buys into it is weak-minded.