Pimpadeaux

Again, all noise and no poof. Words walk. Facts talk. Just at least try to have a semi-informed, semi-factual conversation other than just flinging ignorant poo on the wall and hoping some will stick. Oooga oooga! ===

Have you? Enlighten us with your well-researched support of your points of view. Post links and join an intelligent discussion instead of parroting the MAGAturd propaganda.

How about you challenge your brain to actually hold your on in an intellectual discussion in which you present facts to support your point? You almost never do this. You just throw informational sh!t into the fan. Bring some substance and intelligence to the proceedings instead of toeing the MAGAturd talking-point line.

I haven't drilled down far enough to understand the pro-Russian nature of the seized territories. Perhaps that's the devil in the details. Here is a clip for wikipedia, which gets widely dismissed here: If the Crimeaoids hugely want to be Russian, then Ukraine needs to just let go of that. Same for whatever else got seized if those are hugely pro-Russian territories. It's what Ukraine gets in return, which would be Russian giving up any pro-Uker turf it gained, throwing in a few rubles for repairs, returning the kids it kidnapped and just accepting that Ukraine can join NATO.

What we had before this was four years of a disastrous and embarrassing Clownzo presidency where he left no square inch of Putin's ass unkissed and had Putin licking his chops over a potential U.S. pullout of NATO and one year of a Biden presidency prior to the invasion followed by an unexpected Biden strength and resolve to help a democratic and peaceful nation defend itself, resulting in an history ass kicking of supposed Russian super power and mighty military military. So on one hand you're criticizing Obama and Biden for being weak and then criticizing badass military things Biden as done. Focking hypocrite. Go to bed, you wishy-washy creepy Internet bed wetter.

So you support Trump sending weapons to Ukraine and consider that strength but don't support Biden sending military equipment to Ukraine and call him weak. What a focking moron.

So what would have this Biden "strength" looked like? What was it in regard to Russia did he "undo?" What Putin actually saw was Trump weakness and an opportunity, hoping Trump would pull us out of NATO and paving the way for larger conquest. What Putin underestimated - in no small part due to this country's MAGAturd noise - was Biden's strength and resolve, and now he got himself into a losing war against a determined, democratic enemy who has been well-armed and is determined to fight and win at all costs. You picked the wrong horse, bro.

I hope you're thoroughly enjoying the game!

I hate to hear this. Sorry for your loss.

There's that MAGAturd hypocrisy again. MAGAturd: Biden has been weak against Russia. Common sense: Um, how about all those sanctions and military aid to Ukraine? MAGAturd: Biden is a warmonger. I oppose aid to Ukraine. Common sense: How can you simultaneously say Biden is weak and a warmonger? MAGAturd: Biden has kissed Putin's ass since Day 1. Common sense: So if you oppose Biden's actions against Russia and aid to Ukraine, what does Biden need to do to show you his strength against Russia? And wasn't it Trump who called Putin's actions genius, or something like that? Putin's invasion of Ukraine is kind of a warmonger thing, right? MAGAturd: Biden is a weak ass-kisser and a warmonger. Common sense:

He and other MAGAturds don't like anything that threatens Russia and their beloved Putin, who reminds them of their savior Clownzo the Orangutan.

Western Journal.

GO RANGERS! BEAT THE D-BAGS!

NATO has served as an effective deterrent to Russian aggression for almost 75 years. Russia has a lousy track record of honoring agreements, such as the Budapest Memorandum, which got thrown out the window when Russia seized Crimea. Without the NATO factor as a deterrent, I imagine Russia would just regroup and try again at some point in the future.

Russia ready for peace talks. https://www.newsweek.com/russia-shoigu-beijing-ukraine-peace-talks-1839149 How about let the fockers keep what they have, help rebuild Ukraine and not stand in the way of Ukraine joining NATO so this sh!t never happens again.

1. First Concert - Jeff Beck 2. Last Concert - Amyl and The Sniffers 3. Worst Concert - Jefferson Starship 4. Loudest Concert - Ramones 5. Best Concert - Stevie Ray Vaughan in a small venue before he broke big. 6. Seen The Most - Bruce Springsteen 7. Most Surprising - Motley Crue 8. Happy Got To See - Tom Petty, The Police, The Kinks, Ringo, Stones, Paul McCartney, The Who. 9. Wish I Could Have Seen - Led Zeppelin 10. Seeing Next - Most likely Stones and/or McCartney when they come around next year.

I don't have a problem going to the Stones at age 80, but it's cringe worthy to hear Blink 182 singing about the same stuff they did a quarter century ago.

I listened to their new album last week, and it just all sounds the same. I thought they were great back in the day.

I'd be more inclined to see them now that DeLonge is back, but do I really want to see dude who are around 50 years old singing about the same sh!t they did in the late 1990s and early 2000s?

I had tickets to Seger on his most recent tour, but he postponed due to back issues. What were the Moody Blues like in concert? Also, I haven't seen Chicago but heard they put on a great show.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/rep-dean-phillips-challenge-biden-013811929.html He's a centrist, too!

Let's steer this back to the thread topic, which is about Biden facing a challenger, not about your perception of my political leanings.

I've been referring to the political parties as Democraps and Republiturds for two decades here, Eeyore.

I like "28 Days" and "28 Weeks." Didn't care much for "World War Z" outside of the scene of them crawling up the wall.

So what do you propose Biden do to show you what a tough, manly man he is?