The Phantom's Phantom

100m Americans do and most don't even question it. Since you support these views I assume you're one of them.

Between foxnews dominating all other cable networks combined and Sinclair with huge local reach, plus 100m x users, this whole left wing MSM BS is archaic. Rush Limbaugh used to talk about this but it's been dead for years.

Here @jerryskids another article on how musk transformed x into a right wing echo chamber https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/elon-musk-turned-x-trump-echo-chamber-rcna174321

Not unexpected. I'm more concerned about the number of people including senators who dismiss these crackpots and are willing to roll over to let dictator don do whatever he wants.

Do you know what social media is?

Wow you seriously are this dumb Let me explain. Twitter has a long history of right wing Russian bots. Elon musk bought twitter and changed the algorithm/policies to promote more right wing accounts. Since he endorsed Donald Trump and gave away millions of dollars to get him votes in PA, the x algorithm has pushed hard right. Since election day many on the left have left x and moved to bluesky where the moderation isn't biased. Here is a quick article with links to other articles that may help you learn more about this. https://www.theverge.com/2024/11/17/24298669/musk-trump-endorsement-x-boosting-republican-posts-july-algorithm-change

I don't know what's more pathetic 1) you use the term msdnc 2) you felt the need to explain the term msdnc 3) you deny facts until they are fact checked by a source that you hate msdnc 4) you deny the right wing media like foxnews and x which have multiple times more viewership than what you call MSM msdnc

Why do you need MSNBC to fact check it? Just admit he was wrong, you were wrong and move on. Or do you have carpal tunnel?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/11/trump-angry-about-pfizer-vaccine/ Th FDA had warned Pfizer early on that 32 wasn't enough. Then when cases started rising in the fall they got to a larger number anyway. From the start of the Pfizer trial, the FDA was concerned that 32 cases would be too few and urged the company to wait for more cases, Kathrin Jansen, head of vaccine research and development for Pfizer, said in an interview. “We heard the FDA, but we were concerned it would take us too long to get to the cases” if it raised the number for the first analysis, Jansen said. “And so the FDA said, ‘Okay, fine, it’s your trial.’ ” But many in the scientific community expressed concerns that reporting interim data based on just 32 positive cases was insufficient. By the fall, FDA officials, hoping to reassure scientists and the public, were stressing they would apply a rigorous new standard before authorizing a vaccine — one that would be roughly comparable to full approval. But when the agency tried to publish that new standard, which required two months of follow-up safety data on half the participants, the White House tried to block it, realizing the guidelines made it extremely unlikely a vaccine could be authorized before the election. The new standards meant Pfizer would not have sufficient safety data to apply for an emergency authorization until the second half of November. As cases began to surge in mid-October, Pfizer’s scientists considered simply waiting to do their first analysis at 62 cases, which would provide more confidence about the result and wouldn’t cause much of a delay. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/11/trump-angry-about-pfizer-vaccine/ If anyone was playing politics with the vaccine it was trump who tried everything to get it approved before election Day.

Yes it has and it's safe https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/multiples.html#:~:text=A number of studies have,for a particular aged child.

My God you people are so dumb dumb

And another one. In here it states that they need 2 months of safety data, like topol said. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/16/pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine-authorization-election-429797

Jerry wanna talk about those 100% tariffs now?

Pfizer CEO says you tin foil hat wearers are crazy https://www.reuters.com/article/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/pfizer-ceo-we-didnt-delay-vaccine-results-until-after-election-idUSKBN27X2N2/

Also here is a fact check article that disputes everything you've said https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/18/fact-check-pfizer-received-covid-vaccine-data-after-election-day/6267242002/

Also Jerry still thinks the EU and Japan put a 100% tariff on us autos so his covid election conspiracy ideas need to be taken with a grain of salt

I understand what you said. So maybe you don't understand is that safety data is released continuously. The first batch of data was October and I assume another batch of data was November and it's that data that topol was waiting for. Get it? He probably didn't trust the first round and wanted more data. Or he just has TDS.

One way to look at it is that topol didn't want the vaccine released before election because he hated Trump and wanted to steal the election. The other way is he was concerned that Trump was trying to push an unsafe vaccine through prior to the election and wanted more safety data released and was looking out for safely. Of course if you like Trump you believe the former.

Lots of scientists who believe in science and data hate trump for obvious reasons. Again it's a conspiracy theory.

Topol specifically want a delay until late November when more data would be available. For some reason you think that's a political move.

Updated to say geek club. But I still don't buy the conspiracy theory that this guy stole the election for Trump as you said. That is quite a stretch.

Geek club: some guy stole the election by fraudently delaying the vaccine release killing people. Also geek club: big pharma pushed through a vaccine with no research and no testing killing people.

So the conspiracy theory is the dr didn't care about safety but was just trying to steal the election for Biden? That's what you want people to believe?

Trump won the election. It wasn't a landslide. Prove me wrong.

LANDSLIDE MANDATE