zsasz

It's amazing how they don't get it. They see the boat parades and the big flags on the back of trucks and the meathead talking heads and internet intellectuals sitting in their trucks talking about how great Trump is....and they think that that is the norm. They fail to realize that they live in a echo chamber. They fail to realize that the positions they take from listening to FOX NEWS and Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck and others have isolated them from us Centrists in this country. l

The kid backed a political party whose goal since Reagan was to destroy the working middle class in this country and now he wants to parachute out to Italy? It would be awesome if the parachutes of scumbags like RLLD didn't open when they tried to jump out.

The mans own words.

The guy said he was going to be a dictator. He's telling you how exactly he wants to rule. His economic platform is irrelevant. It's at the whims of the dictator.

100% for unfettered immigration....as long as we're checking for scumbags at the door. Population size is power.

Why not? You clowns are voting for a guy who staffed his resorts with illegals. Why didn't those jobs matter to Americans when Trumps resorts and golf courses were staffed with illegals? I know....it's DIFFERENT.....

Wes Moore is going to be on a short list for POTUS soon. Him and Shapiro in PA are two rising stars in the DNC.

RLLD is a pompus jackass. Even if he is one of the smarter kids on this short bus.....he's still on the short but. He just doesn't think he is.

Even back then he was a scumbag.

You guys cried like sissies over the 450M. Now you're crying like sissies over the 175M! Love it. A baller like Trump should take the fact that he amount his so high and run with it. Bring a portion of the the 175M in in hundreds; make a show of it. Maybe he doesn't have 175M either?

Bu...bu...but...THE SYSTEM IS UNFAIR TO DONALD TRUMP! All the whinging and complaining about how this was unfair was enjoyable to hear. As was mocking Don Poorleone. But, as you can see....the courts did their job and didn't let it get too out of hand. Hopefully he has 175 M though......

LMAO!....Don Poorleone!.....that's good.

Win the war against Fundamentalist Islam by controlling and embracing EVs. If we get off Big Oil...those guys are back to being Camel Humpers in the desert. EVs should be the future in the U.S.; simply for the strategic blow it would strike the ME. That being said, 2035 is a bit too early. That being said, the ME has probably already realized this and are funnelling money into battery development/EV technology.

That translator is going to commit seppuku before he turns on Ohtani. That's how they do that over there.

Trump just tweeted that he's got the money...he's getting it from a Nigerian Prince who has shown interested in loaning it to him.

Their own dumb fault. They shouldn't have overextended.

I wouldn't say they "aren't" going to vote for him.....but enough of him might not vote to make it close.

Of course there isn't precedence for a former POTUS and current POTUS candidate businessman deliberately inflating his worth for whatever reason, then appealing and then either not realizing he needed to actually have the money to appeal or believing himself to be so immune to that fact that he actually needed the money that he didn't care that he didn't have the money. Legal history is being made here.....but at the end of the day, noone should be above the law. The guy made a choice. He shouldn't have immunity because of his former address. That's one of the biggest hypocrisies of the MAGA movement..."Everyone should be held absolutely accountable for their actions in life....except our guy." That being said, despite the politicized tones to this situation; it's not preventing him from engaging in politics. It's just forcing him to account for business decisions he made. Three takeaway ideas from this: A) he is still being treated better than you or I if we were in a similar situation because of his stature. He's (supposedly) rich and he's a former POTUS. He's been allowed to act up in court to the point where they were threatening contempt. He had the luxury of talking about the trial to the public without punishment. I don't believe we'd receive the same leniency. There's a chance that he could get a stay in this ruling or a reduction in the amount he needs to have. I'm not sure that we'd get that chance. B ) If you say you have 400M on hand and that you aren't sweating having to pay it....don't be surprised if someone calls your bluff...particularly if.....you're a dich. C ) Don't be a dich. If the guy lowered his dich volume from "10" to "8" he wouldn't lose any of his hardcore supporters AND he would have won 2020. The guy can't not be an and when you are an , people are going to treat you like an . People aren't going to like you when you are an . People are less willing to give you the benefit of the doubt; they're less likely to overlook your flaws or not try to check you if you get out of line. That's just Basic Human Society Rules 101.

Requesting a stay is within his rights.....but he knew the risk and the procedure when appealing. I'm not sure if asking a man to put up 4% of his wealth is an unusual punishment. As to why he can't get and appeal bond from a financial institution....I don't know. The guy says he's worth between 8.5 and 9 billion. Maybe he isn't? At any rate; either the guys lawyers are completely inept or he didn't take this seriously. Wouldn't you agree that our leaders should have to take our legal system as seriously as we do...and that if they don't...they should be subjected to the same course of action that we would be?

A guy worth 8 1/2 - 9 billion should be able to have the financial connections to secure a bond that's only 4% of his total wealth.

It's amazing how quickly you've just torpedoed your own argument. We get it. You believe in justice for some; based upon the defendents "feelings" as to how he is beaing treated. It's an elitist position. Liberal if you will. That's cool...I guess.

You're not the justice system. You're not authorized to make such decisions; thus...it wouldn't be okay. I get what you are saying though...respecting the justice system and and adhering to its will is selective. Someone like Trump and his supporters; they don't need to pay attention to it. When they're found guilty...it's the system, not their actions that is flawed.

Aren't jails full of people who claim "lawyer fuched me?", "it's the corrupt system that did me in" and " I was set up"? Every criminal in the country should follow the lead of the leaders of the RIght and just scream "PROCESS CRIME" when they are caught.

The only real problem with a lady being in the lead in one of these "fish out of water" stories is that rarely do they portray her as so inept or clueless that the humor really hits home.

The narrative of being "tough on crime" is pretty much gone these days;from both sides of the political aisle. Otherwise, our 45th President of the United States...who is running again, wouldn't be getting so much support despite being charged with a number of crimes. Not only that; but he's promising to free and pardon a number of people who committed crimes on 1/6 at the Capitol.