WhiteWonder

i'm not here supporting Helltoupee or specifically to rag on you. Yes, you are one of the people I find hilarious who rely on AI Overview... because you post AI Overview. Simple as that. Still, my comment had nothing to do with any information specifically presented in your AI Overview, you were just quick to want to move things in that direction. Lots of posters on this board consider themselves master debaters when it comes to everything, especially politics... and some people spend their days creating threads here. It's nuts to me that some of those same people, who likely consider themselves super smart, utilize AI Overview... even knowing how flawed it can be... and then when the person they are debating or having a little spat with doesn't want to go hunt to disprove the AI Overview, it's a gotcha! Like dude, you typed something into google and then copy pasted the AI Overview because it supports your stance. Again, knowing AI Overview can be manipulated by the input question or statement, or even knowing that sometimes the AI Overview is nothing more than a summary of one of the top hit articles under the search results

If you go back to my original comment, did I specifically say anything about YOUR AI overview? If so, please post a link. great… now that we have those games out of the way, I will also add that it’s been shown even on this board multiple times that AI overview can be manipulated with the wording of the question typed in… I also think that people who rely on AI Overview to make their point and then immediately place the onus on other people to “prove it wrong” which requires actual effort when they provided almost none themselves, should have to include the exact question they typed in to start for transparency.

It’s much worse and less accurate than wiki and has a long way to go. Very rarely do I see Incorrect statistical stuff on wiki (especially with sports) but I can’t count the number of times I’ve googled something sports related where I know the statistical answer and google AI overview has been horribly wrong. For things that are more subjective I image there are even more inconsistencies, especially when a lot of the time Google AI is just summarizing the first article or so on a subject.

my comment was in regards to you saying you had no idea she had a show and then the other Tim being very aware of it and loving it and claiming it was the 2nd most popular show on MSDNC

Im not saying Trump has done anything great for the LGB or make believe community but the amount of people who actually rely on AI Overview is hilarious.

timhack has never heard of it apparently

im not sure I care for the assumption they all identify as female

Scientific research . They need scientific research to try to go against science in the first place trust the science! Unless it’s gender related.

same. i still watch some because gambling, but it sucks compared to the 90's and early 2000s. I was upset when they were ending with TNT. I actually was not aware until now that ESPN picked them up. Glad they did, even if it is ESPN.

you are the type of person who would literally vote for anyone who opposes trump, even without knowing much about them. You'll just slap on "given the alternatives" at the end as a disclaimer.

what more warning do you need than "female humanoid robot"? the hell you think it's going to be about?

interesting that dems are all for importing everything cheaply from other countries (and letting them simultaneously rail us with tariffs on our exports) but are crying about importing beef from argentina of course i disagree with the entire argentine beef thing but I am also fairly certain that it would be a non issue if Kamala were in office and the left is only hyper focused on it or acting like they care about american ranchers because the right was so hyper focused on trade imbalances.

transgender and youth are two words that should never be in the same sentence. what an adult chooses to do with their body is up to them but we have ages for voting, drinking, smoking, consent, etc in this country for a reason.

also, even though it has nothing to do with this thread, sometimes the poor actions of the few ruin things for the many. So your comment is even more out of place.

i'm pretty sure that is not at all what I said. I was merely speculating on what we might see, now that we are in it. None of this convo has been about SHOULD we cut them off or not. That is probably for the government shutdown thread. hth.

she did. suicide in 2024 i think

unfortunately we are also going to see the impact of people misusing snap benefits as now, if they don't have them (or other sources of help), they will be angry they don't have the essential staples they were not getting enough of before.

Kimmel really shouldn't have been saying anything, so that really doesn't matter or make it better. Lately, both sides are desperate to make sure people are not one of theirs or to show people are of the opposite side. of course you are correct, for all we know his next sentence could have been "brb I gotta take a massive ". but you are one of those people who likes to pull the "lets let things plays out" card when it possibly looks bad for the left.

Was in atlantic city with some family Monday. Drove my Aunt home and we get along great but she is probably the most far liberal member of my family and definitely the most tds ridden. shes retired and absolutely watches msnbc all day. A dog food commercial can come on the radio and she will find a way to inject something about trump... To each their own. sometimes I can't help but start to debate a bit with her. we touched on a bunch of topics with some responses from her that I just couldn't believe... but at one point she mentioned that the right was responsible for all political violence. I quickly asked, what happened to Charlie Kirk? and she moaned "Charlie kirk, he was a terrible person, do you know the things he would say?" .... I just said, that is ridiculous. it doesn't even matter. He never did anything to warrant harm or death. She quickly walked it back because I think she could sense my disgust and I don't think she meant to imply that he/his life didn't matter. But that is what happens when people get so deep into politics and let it control their emotions.

the most iconic basketball player in the history of the game was bald. Every image of MJ from my youth, he's bald. I'm pretty sure he started shaving it by the early 90's. Seems like he pulled it off and did fairly well for himself.

of course it does. I said it was my initial reaction. I never said I was above making some jokes about it like other posters in here... since, as has been pointed out to you, this is the geek club. I also didn't come in here with the intention to make a post crying about it... like you did. Further, none of this takes away from my feeling that a lot of liberals simply virtue signal.

exactly. how many black men worrying about that?

I knew what the OP was going to be and what the responses were going to be before even opening the thread. I will admit that my initial reaction was "things don't have to just impact YOU to be important" That said, I also can't stand the fake caring and virtue signaling from liberals and I was pretty confident the first karen in here would be gutternuts.