WhiteWonder

Cook and Hubbard were the other 2 backs I was considering when I picked Breece. Really like Hubbards value there

My team is gone. This isn’t supposed to happen until Friday evening.

Fatty Patty @Cloaca du jour

Si Flair Kim

Steal

Bijan, Breece, Brock killer Bs baby! Breece Hall: it feels very boom or bust and there were 2 other RBs I considered here. Decided to be a homer. Hall played banged up most of last year and while the Jets have some depth, I’m going to roll the dice on him being their version of Gibbs. Plus he’s in a contract year. Brock Bowers : I don’t like going TE this early but with a QB and coaching upgrade (and not much WR upgrade) I could see him being the slam dunk TE1 with very little downside

3.01 - TE Brock Bowers, LV

2.12 - RB Breece Hall, NYJ

looking at a handful of players for this upcoming turn. Was hoping Bucky Irving might fall.... have a feeling my next pick will not be highly regarded. we shall see.

Harris English @chatgpt

Matsuyama @Alias Detective

845 EVO's here

Very true and jbitcho is indeed a clown. I will say though that unfortunately for Biden, it was a microcosm of his entire being. So while the trolls used it non stop, it was a little more indicative of his condition and rapid decline

Rahm

@TheNewGirls post about apologizing to an ex for some reason got me thinking about this topic. A lot of women seem to always say or think that a woman can be friends with a man with no ulterior motive but men can't do the same. I think women overestimate their ability but I do think there are lots of women who like having gay guys as friends... so that alone makes it more likely. So I am curious if posters here legitimately have female friends they have never slept with, don't want to sleep with OR who don't want to sleep with THEM. I don't think that I do. I'm not counting co workers who I get along with at work because I generally don't consider them friends. My best female friend is a woman I slept with numerous times roughly 15 years ago. I have 2 other women I consider to be my friends currently who I don't feel the urge to sleep with. However, one of them who I find attractive enough has become a sort of friend with benefits (she initiated) and the other flat out told me she wants to have secks, but she is not at all my type physically and the friend group dynamic would become awkward. This is obviously easier for married geeks, so the question also includes "if you were not married". Meaning is the existence of your wife the only thing stopping you from wanting to bang that female friend? How many of these female friends are just her friends who have become part of your social circle... do you really consider them to be your friends?

1.01 - RB Bijan Robinson, ATL

I really have not started to do any research for this season, so that may have something to do with it but this feels like one of those years where I really don't care where i'm drafting... or certainly don't see any slam dunk top pick (the way too early drafters would have considered CMC last season). So i'm taking one of the top 3 RB's on my board and going with the one I think has the most upside compared to their 2024 because I feel he has either less competition or less wear and tear.

For a former journalist, your fact finding is pretty poor. I never once used the word liberal in my short back and forth with you. You were the one who mentioned liberals but my focus was on the "crying about Trump". Granted, the majority of the anti trump, "anyone but trump", "not my president", wah wah group are liberals but I absolutely never called you part of the liberal collective, to be fair. (though most of your posting does make you seem very liberal) As for spending 30 years as a journalist, not sure if I am supposed to care. Were you a political journalist? Setting aside the fact that a lot of people are not experts in their chosen field, if you WERE a political journalist, I would give you more credit than the average poster here because I would assume that you soaked up enough general political knowledge second hand. If not? ... my uncle was a political editor for a major paper for most of his life. Had he been a sports editor i'd be a lot less likely to care about his take on politics, for example. As for the specific 4 year period of crying, that was between you and RLLD, no? Liberals or "anti trumps" were crying for 8 years. Whatever you guys were talking about, he'd have to be the one to narrow it down I guess.

He’s an all time great, 3 of his 6 majors fall in the time period Lager gave. And it’s a Masters, Open and PGA showing his range. Plus setting the record for oldest major winner. 8 total wins in that span I guess is lackluster.

I used a Cleveland VAS lob wedge in school matches (my father actually bought the entire set )

Haha I’m not going anywhere, brutha. My last comment about playing banker was just letting everyone know how that’s going to run next year in case someone else wants to take over. As for the real life game I’ve been tinkering with my driver and currently using the shaft that came in my Qi10 with my M2 head and bombing it. Putting has been better as well. Iron play has been a struggle and the scoring undone by too many penalties.

I’m going to get lambasted for this but I’m absolutely putting Phil on that Rushmore. His last Masters win was 15 years ago, his Open title was 2013 and obviously became the oldest player to win a major in 2021. Prior to leaving for LIV he was arguably one of the 3 most famous, biggest needle moving players in the game with Tiger and Rory. He and Tiger made “the match” a thing. And there’s also part of me that wants to point out he was instrumental in LIV, which like it or loathe it, changed the landscape of golf and exposed the issues of the PGA Rory has to be in there, as much as I dislike him. Brooks is tough. 5 majors and a cool nickname but never won much outside the big ones and wasn’t very well liked (and didn’t care). If the 5 majors gets him in, it’s only 2 more than old man Phil over the 15 year period in question and Phil beat him heads up.

Can’t wait

You are a part of the collective Trump hater group. You just said so earlier in this thread. You were blindly voting against Trump and would have voted for a brick (which you did in 2020). You have a bunch of Trump related avatars. You are sort of the poster boy for TDS You likely don’t know much about politics and just vote with your feelings. Which is fine because lots of people are like that but you post A LOT in political topics pretending to know what you’re talking about so…

the collective you, which the singular you know I meant.