Cdub100

It's amazing how well they've programmed the public. An event so well-documented shouldn't even trouble people with a couple of questions, but they go go full rage mode. Just like they have been trained. Hell they should just ignore the comment but they can't help themselves. They must preach the jew gospel. Oy Vey 109 OTHER countries were wrong.

It's interesting how angry they've programmed you to be when someone dares peel back the onion just one section. And yes I've seen lots of war pictures past and current and it's hell on everyone.

Yes Poland had by far the most Jews and it's not even close.Of course you would pick that one phrase it in a way that 3M was the norm. It wasn't.

Tell me how many Jews lived there. It's a simple question.

Just to be clear how many Jews do you think lived in Germany let alone Europe during that time?

They were work camps. Turns out when there is a world war going on and the choice of feeding your troops or the people who tried to overthrow your government it's no surprise the troops get fed. My favorite photo of the holocaust is the one of the Jew women in the "death camps" with their newborn babies.

6 gorjillion!!! An event so documented you get sent to jail denying the Jew version of events.

I try my best to avoid Jewish propaganda.

I've seen what the Jews do to the people of Palestine. This is 100% a two-way street. If you don't believe that is true you have watched too much propaganda.

That video is glowing with CIA agents and influence.

Now that you're a lefty you need to embrace your KKK, nazi democrat history.

It's an interesting dilemma for liberals. So many of them support a free Palestine but then again they also support Jews.

Gotta support Israel! IT's the rallying call for both liberals and conservatives.

Poor Ukraine. You're focking out! Isreal is focking in.

It's interesting. I can point out all kinds of things about different races. But literally, any mention of jews brings out this response. They have program the public very well.

It's about power. They do the same sh1t all around the world

Oh it's a plot and they are very open about it.

Again I'm not a conservative. And I'm not a right-winger. Nazis are far left. ETA - I know all about conservatives. They love Israel and will send billions. It's the uniparty way!

No, Trump's "very fine people" are conservatives. I'm not a conservative. I'm much further right.

Of course, Jews control most of America. They will force us into this sh1t.

If you're wondering why black people have a hard time understanding contracts this might help you. I of course will be called racist and a bunch of other stuff for sharing this, but I don't care. https://halcyoninitiative.wordpress.com/2014/10/05/morality-and-abstract-thinking-how-africans-may-differ-from-westerners-from-amren-com/ But, he assured me, it was otherwise for “promise.” I was skeptical. How about “obligation?” We both had the same dictionary (English-Zulu, Zulu-English Dictionary, published by Witwatersrand University Press in 1958), and looked it up. The Zulu entry means “as if to bind one’s feet.” He said that was not indigenous but was added by the compilers. But if Zulu didn’t have the concept of obligation, how could it have the concept of a promise, since a promise is simply the oral undertaking of an obligation? I was interested in this, I said, because Africans often failed to keep promises and never apologized—as if this didn’t warrant an apology. A light bulb seemed to go on in his mind. Yes, he said; in fact, the Zulu word for promise—isithembiso—is not the correct word. When a black person “promises” he means “maybe I will and maybe I won’t.” But, I said, this makes nonsense of promising, the very purpose of which is to bind one to a course of action. When one is not sure he can do something he may say, “I will try but I can’t promise.” He said he’d heard whites say that and had never understood it till now. As a young Romanian friend so aptly summed it up, when a black person “promises” he means “I’ll try.” The failure to keep promises is therefore not a language problem. It is hard to believe that after living with whites for so long they would not learn the correct meaning, and it is too much of a coincidence that the same phenomenon is found in Nigeria, Kenya and Papua New Guinea, where I have also lived. It is much more likely that Africans generally lack the very concept and hence cannot give the word its correct meaning. This would seem to indicate some difference in intellectual capacity. Note the Zulu entry for obligation: “as if to bind one’s feet.” An obligation binds you, but it does so morally, not physically. It is an abstract concept, which is why there is no word for it in Zulu. So what did the authors of the dictionary do? They took this abstract concept and made it concrete. Feet, rope, and tying are all tangible and observable, and therefore things all blacks will understand, whereas many will not understand what an obligation is. The fact that they had to define it in this way is, by itself, compelling evidence for my conclusion that Zulu thought has few abstract concepts and indirect evidence for the view that Africans may be deficient in abstract thinking.

Deplorable.

Time to update the the ole facebook and support current thing!

Oy Vey! Gotta support Isreal!

Nope