Red White and Blue

What else are they going to run on? Their excellent stewardship of the economy and the war in Iraq?

Fock that had to hurt!

How many Aussies does it take to screw in a lightbulb? Two: One to screw the lightbulb in and the other to get stung in the heart by a stingray and die.

Well since this thread is all sensitive and stuff ... I need to date someone who's smart and someone who shares my interests - reading, movies, follows the news. I think it's really weird when people just don't read. I can do without dating someone who's into sports, I'd rather watch the game w/ my guy friends anyway, but I've dated girls who don't just not like sports - they think they're stupid and almost look down on people who like them. I'm not having that anymore. It's also really important to me to date someone who has her own life. I need a lot of personal time and space and can't stand it when someone calls me everyday. It helps if whoever I'm dating and I can do things together without interrupting each other, like if I bring work home or I'm cooking or whatever she can read or watch TV, do her thing. We're together but not up each other's asses. I don't have to date a model but she's got to be cute. And I think sexually chemistry is just something you have or don't have. I've been in relationships with girls who just aren't into experimenting or want sex more/less than I do, whatever. I think either you naturally are compatible in bed or you're not, and I wouldn't waste my time w/ someone if we weren't. I'd never have said this 5-10 years ago but I couldn't date someone who doesn't get along with my friends and family. There may be one more.

I don't think your list is unrealistic, just boring. What woman wants an insecure, clingy poosay who's smaller than her and doesn't know how to stand up for himself? Confidence is sexy, wow there's a shocker.

It doesn't taste like pizza and the crust is like chewing on a focking sponge.

Well, yeah you got me there.

Why not? Just based on your taste in music and your FFT personality I'd say you're very dateable.

Where does Torrid sign up?

Arrrrrrr!

Pathetic classless quitting losers, just like their classless loser fans.

No wonder they got destroyed by the Yankees - no class or desire to win at all.

And then Snuff pulls out the old card. And everyone knows that beats rock, paper and scissors. If you want to know why I don't support military action against Iran, yet: * They are years away from having a nuclear weapon. * Their weapons facilities are beneath residential neighborhoods - we'd have to kill tens of thousands of civilians, and I think that hurts us more than helps us in the war on terror. * What's the plan after we bomb Iran? Are you ready to invade and secure another country while we're still fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq? Until these questions are answered and as long as Iran isn't an imminent threat to us I think talk of military action is premature. Also, I think a lot of the people banging the war drums these days are the same folks who were lobbying for war with Iraq (how'd that work out?) and that a lot of people in Congress want to use Iran as a campaign issue. We just made this mistake three years ago - IMO it's time to think long and hard about this strategery of pre-emptive military action against nations that don't even pose a threat to us today. HTH.

Your mom

It reminds you of how much fun vomitting can be.

No matter how many times you keep harping on it, the bottom line is I said nothing about Bush until you brought it up. If you want to talk about Bush that's fine, just stop projecting your obsessions onto me. Thanks.

Dude, for the third time I didn't bring Bush into this! You're sounding a little unhinged!

For now, yeah I'd rather ignore Iran than launch a third war. You started by saying I'm a sad little man because I think the people banging the war drum for nuking Iran are nutty, then you accuse me of ripping Bush and when I point out that I didn't even mention the president you come up with the highly original and hilarious claim that I'm a secretary who wears mascara. You've added less than zero to this thread and you have nothing to say.

So after you get owned you just start slinging 7th grade caliber insults. Gee I didn't see that one coming.

The wingnuts I was talking about are the neocon chickenhawks who've been calling for war against Iran for the last few years. Now please, STFU and stop embarassing yourself.

Scroll back. Now read my first post. Did I mention Bush? No I did not. Now shut the fock up you focking focktard.

Well then I disagree. I think Dallas has no shot. They're old and they'll quit on Tuna late in the year.

So what exactly is this force you're talking about? Iran's weapons facilities are beneath residential neighborhoods. You start bombing them and you're killing thousands of innocent people. How's that going to help our "hearts and minds" approach to the middle east? Even if you think that's a good idea, our military is stretched to the limit as-is. You really want to put Donald Rumsfeld in charge of another war? I'd just as soon ignore Iran for the next two years and hope the next administration is a lot smarter than the current one.

And you're a focking dolt. Until you can tell me what was wrong with my analysis, just sit there at the kid's table looking stupid, junior.

Oh, okay. I'm not sure what we're arguing about then. I said the Cowboys won't win the Super Bowl and since they have no QB of the future and they're loaded with aging players they probably won't get better until after Tuna retires and they rebuild. I guess we're in agreement.