TeNt

Should I drop chambers for Jerricho Cotchery? I would, but chambers is definatly more talented and just started complaining about the lack of long pass plays to him... the phins could adjust, or I could drop Lee Evans instead... thats what im leaning towards doing

scratch this, im going to make a brand new trade with him and possibly get eli manning (completley different players than this)

I was porposed this trade: Id get: Kicker Jeff Wilikins of the Rams (has 74 fan points) Phili defense (has 117) Id give darell Jackson (69 points) Clintion Portis (71 points) I have ghram at kicker and seatlles D I was leaning towards no, the kicker and d have more added points than darell and clinton, but I really hate trusting a kicker and defense over RB and WR.. ?????

Taylor and washington... unless you hafe a gut feeling chicago will have an off week

well the thing is, I could dump my current kicker (grahm) and defense (seattle) and pickup chester taylor and Jerricho Cotchery I currently have caddilac (cant cut list) portis, henry, and kevin jones at RB and chambers, buress, coles, and branch at WR. ohh and ill check those links in a bit

I dont see why the position matters though, the fan points are what decide if you win or lose

Ok... kevin jones is a FA right now, I want him. I have caddy but hes on the damn cant cut list, so my next option is reggie bush. Should I do that? Will reggie continue to be a fantasy busting decoy? Also, should I start dieon over chris chambers? Is dieon comfortable?

I could also drop dieon branch or lee evans

I have caddy reggie, and portis maroney, chester taylor, dillion, fred taylor, and kevin jones are all avalible... which should I get... I was thinking dropping caddy for maroney (he has 44 points in my league right now)

yeah, james/taylor and colston/walker http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=241728

portis man, for jackson. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=241728

I would, chambers isnt doing great, plaxico is doin fine (i have them both) and you look good at RB. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=241728

lewis randle el http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=241728

Addai, Evans, Bennet could be wrong, but thats what the gut of mine says... http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=241728

who gives a ######?

NEVER Sh1t anywhere other than your own home... I went through school and only did it twice, because i had some basketball games and couldnt bare it... otherwise wait.

yeah it was, thats pathetic.

huh? the economy wasnt close to this good when clinton left..... they had to recover from him, then deal with 9/11, a war, and gas prices... and they still got it this high get off the crack

I think they are retarded, all they do is make people bias. And start mudslinging crap about their opponets party... compleltey ignoring the subject matter. Like "you libs always do that" and "you stupid redneck conservatives never..." no good comes from them other than a system for elections... and if no one could come up with another... god help us. p.s. I know they arent going anywhere... im just saying

Not true. I watch fox news and other than shows like the orielly factor and hannity and colmes (opinionated shows) the news is bias free... they simply say what happned and how it happend. Also Ive never seen them leave anything out that was conservative or put more conservative news on (im speaking of the straight news show, like studio B*) I have often seen things on there that heaily favor the shared liberal view, as well as things that favor the shared conserative view. If you draw a conservative bias from that... perhaps you joined the wrong party? *had to put the star because the B and the ) together turn into

No, a uniform belif system forced on everyone would be even worse. What I would like to see is a system where the issues are presented, and you decide what you think based on the information you achived. Voting to be the same way. The problem with that is most issues are an A or B thing... so it would spawn groups A and B anyways. Im just saying this is a problem, pretty much a solutionless problem... but a problem. The only sure fire way to fix it would be for all Americans to drop bias, and do research on each and every issue they speak about, and swollow their pride. But... uhh... thats not about to happen...

would my 3-0 record, and the fact that I wasn't even going to play but a friend needed a 6th man do anything to change that?

Ohh so your hero founds something good, and wallace asks ONE question about something else (something thats been the topic to discuss for the past 6 years or so) and wallace is out of line? Come on NOONE can be this dumb without 6 tons worth of bias sitting on them.

perfect example of why political parties are trash... without them almost everyone would read this and say "hey, great news!" but no, everyone got to be like "well the dems say this and the republicans say this and weve done a better" its ok though, what the hell do I and george washington know?

its funny because its true