Durka Durka?

So you had 5 RB1's?

It's certainly not "high risk" to throw him on your roster if you don't need the space, and he has the talent. But I don't see him having another productive season again, ever. You just don't go away from the game for this long and come back and dominate, especially at a position as volatile as WR. For a similar reason I don't see Victor Cruz ever returning to form.

FWIW: http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/10395/dorial-green-beckham Things may be a bit different with the new HC. Putting Dorial in your lineup is still a dart throw... but it's a very intriguing dart throw

Ivory. It isn't close.

The tough stretch of defenses this guy has to endure is the reason I avoided him in drafts. Looks like things are getting right for him under the new coach, but ANYONE can blow up for one game. It's too early to say for sure, but if he is able to keep up the high volume and anything close to the YPC he had this week, I would say he is a low end RB-1 for the rest of the year. Well, I would say that if he had a normal schedule. But the strong run D's of his opposition force me to demote him to high end RB2 status. Until he proves he can keep it up, I treat him as more of a low-mid range RB2.

Clay ASJ Gilmore imo

Carrol has said Rawls will continue to get touches with Lynch fully healthy... We're not talking RBBC here, but pretty much no chance of zero carries. That said, I just cut Rawls, definitely wouldn't start him

From what I can see of your roster, trade was not as bad as people in this thread are making it sound. That said, trade is still not good.

Maybe so, but they also got trampled in the first half by an offense missing its 2 best players. It may not be an "easy" matchup, and anything can happen any given week, but it looks decent enough to me on paper. The only thing that really worries me is if Blue struggles out of the gate or fumbles and Chris Polk sees the rest of the day's work.

It's a bit risky with how houston has been using the backs in foster's absence, but Blue getting so many carries in week 3 is encouraging. I am probably starting Blue over Crowell and Ellington if Foster sits.

What kind of logic is this? Just because the starter hasn't done anything recently, the guy LOWER on the depth chart is gonna explode? Actually, you're right... All those Bradford owners are gonna be kicking themselves for taking him when Mark Sanchez was still available. When was the last time Bradford did anything?

Bryant is pretty firmly planted on my DND list after this. I'll let someone else draft him and other guys who aren't even starters like Josh Hill and Zach Ertz. How is Bryant supposed to supplant the guy higher than him on the depth chart while he's suspended? I could see it happening at some point in the season, but if it does it will take a while. Still don't really want Wheaton either... I think this suspension bumped him up to 29th or so receiver on my rankings.

I'd say Moreno, Miami's running game has looked stellar this season and Knowshon should at least split carries with Miller. Mathews really wasn't doing anything even before he got injured, and should have about the same role when he returns if you expect Oliver to fill Woodhead's shoes. Basically I expect Mathews to get a higher percentage of carries but Moreno to do more with them.

I dunno. Hillman definitely looked capable of being the 1st and 2nd down guy on Sunday. Not saying CJ Anderson doesnt have a chance here but I think Hillman gets first crack at the job while Ball is away. Not that I care what happens, I have them both. Well, I do hope it's not full blown RBBC...

You can't just assume his YPC is going to improve. It could just as easily get worse. I know Hue Jackson is likely to implement an RB friendly scheme, but last year's scheme was already pretty RB friendly... Also, with regard to Hue Jackson... everyone likes to say he wants to run the ball, so they up the projections on Gio's carries. However, people only see this as a positive thing for Gio's carries, and never a negative thing for his catches. Why?