Jump to content

donhaas

Members
  • Content Count

    8,524
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by donhaas


  1. um, sorry: this is for the fans of the lions and the bears. you know, the two teams that actually will play any meaningful games the rest of the way. i understand you wanting to jump ship on the packers, but too bad so sad.

     

    besides, i've watched you for the second time say "oh, i didn't make no sig bet!" when called out by bls this past week. you mysteriously don't make any or have no recollection of them when you lose. so forgive me for not throwing my pearls before the swine  :rolleyes:

     

    when ferguson went out, i have expected to backtrack on that one sig bet we do have. you aren't going to welch on that now, are you?

    There was no bet made between me and BLS and he clearly stated it in the same thread and you clearly understood it. I understand you wanting to fabricate a story about me thinking it will cover up how you annually slink away from this site like a little girl when the Packers dominate the Lions. But don't lie. You get busted time and time again. :thumbsdown:

     

    BLS and I have bet many times; sometimes winning and sometimes losing... there's no reason why I wouldn't put the signature of his deceased friend on my posts on an anoymous message board. Quit being a tool and quite being a liar. It just makes you look like an idiot.

    I mean like more of an idiot..

     

    Back to the topic. Are you confident enough of the Lions to win to not only post 1,000 times that they will, but to actually back it up with a meaningful bet..

     

    I don't want to bet on the Bears, but your backtracking and topic-changing when your ass is on the line have achieved my goal. You are a pooooooooooosay.

     

    So keep talking about the Lions. Blah, blah, blah.... Nobody believes you because you are to chickensh!t to bet in what you say you believe.

     

    SDIAFP!! :thumbsup:


  2. yeah. oh, and the minor intangible that the bears haven't won a road game in a year and have a total of 5 since 2001  :lol:  :rolleyes:

    How many do the Lions have in that timespan?

     

    Ill give you a hit...it was fewer than the Bears.

     

    And what was it about past performance and the future?

     

    Oh wait, it is you trying to use past performance so it must mean something.

     

    <_<

    if the lions were playing on the road against the bears this week, i wouldn't have them favored, either ;)

     

    so let's talk about now: who are you? and where is your team?

     

    exactly.

    Ahh...that is your response to your inaccurate use of historic numbers when they fit your arguement but bemoaning them when they work against you? Where is my team? Thats all you got?

     

    And I was not saying the Lions were on the road, I found it funny you would laugh and put a smiley after that comment about the Bears on the road given the Lions record on the road in the past few years is much worse.

    my numbers weren't inaccurate:

     

    1) the bears haven't won a road game since last november and they have 5 total since 2001.

     

    2) you brought up the lions road record. i correctly pointed out that that is invalid to this week's game: the lions are at home and the bears are on the road. if the lions were on the road at chi this week i wouldn't be predicting a lion blowout like all of these delusional bear fans.

     

    keep spinning away.

     

    i understand you wanting to participate, as the packers will not play in a meaningful game the rest of the season, but stop the idiocy.

    1..Sorry, brainfart...meant inconsistent...or as it is known here...typical swamp dog.

    2..I brought it up because it is funny you would mention the bear's road troubles and add a laughing smilie when the Lion's is worse.

     

    Spin? What spin...you state the past performance...blah blah blah...then you bring it up when you see fit or if it fits into your arguement. You are nothing but a hypocrite and it is way too easy to point that out anymore.

     

    Idiocy? Yeah...I guess it is idiotic to keep pointing out your obvious delusion.

    Funny you would also talk about me wanting to "participate"...as if you ever stay out of a thread that has little to nothing to do with your Lions. (Ahem...like the BLS sig bet thread). :(

    i hear someone talking (looks down to ground and all around)...sounds muffled. can't quite make it out. must be cause they're yelling in the cellar again.

    Now you know how we feel trying to understand you for the last 45 years :banana: :banana:

     

     

    Again: What's your prediction???

     

    If you're willing to take Detroit at home, I'll wager a month's ban B)


  3. so let's talk about now: who are you? and where is your team?

     

    exactly.

    :cry:

     

    Sampdog says this when he is thoroughly owned.

     

    Let's get this straight: If you're team is currently doing poorly you have no right to call out a pyscho stalkers contradictions and delusions???

     

    If losing teams can't comment on football, then explain your existence for the last 45 years :banana:

     

    ....and counting <_<

     

     

    I have yet to see a prediction on this game out of Sampdog, too. :chicken:

     

    Detroit is at home. They have a better quarterback now.

     

    I'll wager a one month ban on the "crappy" Chicago team :thumbsdown:

    What says Sampdog????


  4. Never is a long time, and considering I did the Denver Meet the Geek, you'd have lost that bet already.  :thumbsdown:

    Maybe you're just avoiding me, 'cause I've been involved a more than a couple Minnesota geek gatherings; the last one a week ago. Badgers!!!

     

    I'll be back to Minn. before you know it.

    We can talk about how good the Packers will be next year when all the players come back from injuries and we have Maroney at RB. :lol:


  5. BLS - I gotta know...you a Bears Fan?

    A Bear fan attempting to collect sig bets from a Packer / Viking game? Use your common sense... :(

    Yup, sounds like a Viking fan talking smack after beating a bunch of second and third stringers at home on the second longest game winning field goal in NFL history.

    Beggers can't be choosers :(


  6. I'll look forward to Harrington doing some pom pom cheers on the sideline during next weekend's thumping the Lions are going to hand the Bears.  Its payback time.

    Yessir - Orton will look like Suckington did at Soldier field!! Paybacks are he11!!

    Lions 23-8.

    rogers and bly being out tempers my enthusiasm, but this one has "orton biatch slap" written all over it.

     

    should be greta :lol:

    :cry:

    :cry:

     

    "Injuries are part of the game. Many teams have them much, much worse.

     

    Suck it up and be a man."

     

    Didn't you just say this, delusion boy?

    What's it like living in your world, kenmuscles??

     

    :first:


  7. I think the funniest thing about this thread is that Minnesota fans (and Detroit fans) think that the Packer fans are trying to say that the Packers are good or are at some point during this season going to be good.   The question raised was why did the Packers lose a game that they were up by 17 points.   The simple answer is that they stopped being able to move the football.     When you have the football, your opponent doesn't have the football.    It also makes it easier to score points.  

     

    Again, the Packers were bad going in, they are worse coming out.   The Vikings are still bad after beating a severely depleted Packers squad, and no one from the North is going to do anything, and the Packers look like the worst of the bunch.  

     

    If they are going to be bad, there is a part of me that is kind of glad that the Packers are going to be bad enough to push through major change in the off-season.   

     

    Favre is likely to retire rather than go through a season like this one will be.   Rodgers will be able to start fresh.   If Walker comes back healthy, it's like getting another top-5 pick out of the deal, compared to this year.   Davenport should sign for cheap after his season-ender.  Sherman will likely be fired.    The team will likely have a top 5 draft pick to help rebuild.    Not a complete disaster.

    Pretty much true, though the team should've been cut down and brought back a few years ago. Farve and Green have been keeping the Packers in mediocrity for some time now. Unable to actually do anything actually useful every season, but also unable to crash and burn (like this season) to begin the rebuilding process from the ground up. Kind of reminds me of what happened to the 49ers for a number of years.

    Favre and Green have been keeping them in mediocrity?

     

    Favre and Green have kept them competetive...they are not holding the team back...and have not been.

     

    Who has? Mike Sherman as a GM definately did...Thompson is fixing his problems.

    What has TT done to fix any problems? If anything, he did absolutely nothing all off season. Say what you want, look around the league if you do not believe me, but when you have a solid QB, you have a chance to win it all, and it is your duty to put other pieces around him. Once that QB is gone, and you start with an Aaron Rodgers, the other pieces will look worse than they do right now. ANd you will forever be in that quagmire unless you get a dominant defense or a Carson Palmer or Tom Brady.

     

    TT is as much to blame for this mess as Sherman.

    You have no grip on the Packers cap situation. What would you have done? Kept Sharper? Couldn't afford it. Kept the guards? No way in he11 we could afford that? Sign Reggie White to a FA contract? Couldn't afford it.

     

    It's much too early to say whether TT is doing a good or bad job IMHO. We'll know in a few years.


  8. I'm not a fan of either team but I watched the whole game.

     

    Farve was Dominant the First half.

     

    End of first half Daunte made 2 really nice throws that were dropped.

     

    2nd Half it was all Culpepper, he was playing very very well.

     

    Throwing nicely, no picks, nice targeting, and he even found holes to run 41 yards.

     

    Culpepper is not back yet, but that 2nd half in green bay has a good chance of turning this team around..

     

    Comment all you want with the 'Vikings suck 2-12 blah blah blah' 'were up agianst whoever'  They are still a NFL team who just won a big game, they are not out yet.

    the vikes are very much in it along with the bears and lions. those of us that predicted a vike-lion fight for the division stand a good chance of being proven correct at the end of the year, though the bears now look to be there at the end, too.

    Bears look to possibly be there in the end, too???

     

    How kind of you after they kicked the living sh!t out of your Arizona Cardinals East 38-6. :lol:

     

    :D


  9. Hey, if the Vikings want to feel good about this game, that's fine with me.   The Packers were bad going in and got worse during the game due to injuries.

    It's not so much about feeling good about the win is that it feels nice to know that the Pack sucks even harder than the Queens, which is quite the accomplishment.

    3rd string Packers are very slightly worse than the Queens on the road.

     

    First-string Packers were completely dominating them.

     

    HTH ;)

    yeah, ahman green really tore it up when he was in there. what a difference maker. and i wasn't aware the packer secondary "suddenly" switched out at halftime to their second and third stringers? linebackers, too? i swear i still saw favre in there in the second half...maybe rodgers was wearing his jersey?

     

    get over it.

    Collins out...Diggs out still...lenon then hurt (pretty late though)...Green and Davenport out, Walker and Ferguson out....

     

    Yes...there were alot of 2nd and 3rd stringers in the game in the 2nd half.

    did diggs start the game? then he's immaterial to the excuse thesis machine you're spinning here (i.e. "if only *sniff* we didn't have all those mean, unfair injuries...we would have prevailed").

     

    again, teams overcome them. the lions lost bly, rogers, kevin johnson, roy (still out), charles rogers (still out). and didn't have the luxury of a 17 point halftime lead.

     

    there aren't ANY excuses in football. you lose when you suck.

    Your crying about scrubs like K. Johnson and C. Rogers :cheers:

     

    What? Do they have 5 total catches this year put together?

     

     

    SDIAFP!!! :cheers:


  10. Hey, if the Vikings want to feel good about this game, that's fine with me.   The Packers were bad going in and got worse during the game due to injuries.

    It's not so much about feeling good about the win is that it feels nice to know that the Pack sucks even harder than the Queens, which is quite the accomplishment.

    3rd string Packers are very slightly worse than the Queens on the road.

     

    First-string Packers were completely dominating them.

     

    HTH :wall:

    yeah, ahman green really tore it up when he was in there. what a difference maker. and i wasn't aware the packer secondary "suddenly" switched out at halftime to their second and third stringers? linebackers, too? i swear i still saw favre in there in the second half...maybe rodgers was wearing his jersey?

     

    get over it.

    I'm over it.

     

    You're the one who is :wall: :D and seems to be getting all worked up.

     

    The Packers could lose 15 close games this year with their back-up players, but, unfortunately the Lions will still suck and will still be the worst franchise in the history of the NFL and possibly of all sports.

     

    :wall:


  11. cry me a river. injuries are a part of the game. the lions lost bly and shaun rogers early in the game today--along with kevin johnson--to go along with bryant (out for the year), roy williams (2 weeks running) and charles rogers (month suspension) AND no luxury of having brett favre at qb AND they still won on the road today and are .500.

     

    excuse me: what the fock are the packers excuses again? not injuries: THEY SUCK.

     

    i can't believe i'm sitting here listening to you cheeseheads make excuses and point to robert friggin ferguson's injury as a key turning point in the game  :wall:

     

    stop whining.

    :wall: All you do is whine. :wall:

     

    Packers completely dominated on the road when they were kind of healthy in the first half.

     

    It's what happened. Facts. Get over it.

     

     

    You're team is going nowhere for the 49th season in a row. :rolleyes:

    hey, maybe they give medals and moral victories for that kind of stuff! if so, after the packers get theirs for playing part of the game the way it should be played, let me know where the nfl is handing out "we played good for ___________(fill in the blank) number of minutes" medals...a bunch of other losing teams will want to cash in on that.

     

    the packers blew a 17-0 lead. the packers are 1-5. the packers are in the nfcn cellar heading into games against cincy, pitt, and atlanta. spin that.

    Nobody's talking about that.

     

    GL wanted to know what happened and I let him know.

     

    You're team still sucks for the 49th straight year and you have an old gay quarterback who sucks slightly less than your younger gay quarterback. :D

     

     

    :thumbsup:


  12. cry me a river. injuries are a part of the game. the lions lost bly and shaun rogers early in the game today--along with kevin johnson--to go along with bryant (out for the year), roy williams (2 weeks running) and charles rogers (month suspension) AND no luxury of having brett favre at qb AND they still won on the road today and are .500.

     

    excuse me: what the fock are the packers excuses again? not injuries: THEY SUCK.

     

    i can't believe i'm sitting here listening to you cheeseheads make excuses and point to robert friggin ferguson's injury as a key turning point in the game  :D

     

    stop whining and take your deserved lumps.

    Shut the hell up moron.

     

    Nobody is saying it is the only reason.

     

    Your little lap dog puppy pal asked about the game...we told him what went on.

     

    If you deny Ferguson's injury was a factor you are more delusional and ignorant than I first thought.

     

    And let me let you in on a little secret...your lions suck too.

    yeah, fergie going out had everything to do with culpepper lighting the packer secondary up like a christmas tree in the second half.

     

    again: we're talking about ROBERT FERGUSON! does anyone else find that ironic?

    Just you.

    Ferguson would be the leading receiver on the Lions.

     

    He hurt himself on a great 43 yard catch, too. I'm sure you saw it.

     

    The Packers had some guy with dreads in their from the World League that I've never seen before. Makes defense that much easier.

     

    You know nothing about football.


  13. Hey, if the Vikings want to feel good about this game, that's fine with me.  The Packers were bad going in and got worse during the game due to injuries.

    It's not so much about feeling good about the win is that it feels nice to know that the Pack sucks even harder than the Queens, which is quite the accomplishment.

    3rd string Packers are very slightly worse than the Queens on the road.

     

    First-string Packers were completely dominating them.

     

    HTH :pointstosky:


  14. cry me a river. injuries are a part of the game. the lions lost bly and shaun rogers early in the game today--along with kevin johnson--to go along with bryant (out for the year), roy williams (2 weeks running) and charles rogers (month suspension) AND no luxury of having brett favre at qb AND they still won on the road today and are .500.

     

    excuse me: what the fock are the packers excuses again? not injuries: THEY SUCK.

     

    i can't believe i'm sitting here listening to you cheeseheads make excuses and point to robert friggin ferguson's injury as a key turning point in the game :pointstosky:

     

    stop whining.

    :pointstosky: All you do is whine. :thumbsdown:

     

    Packers completely dominated on the road when they were kind of healthy in the first half.

     

    It's what happened. Facts. Get over it.

     

     

    You're team is going nowhere for the 49th season in a row. :pointstosky:


  15. i cant believe we're getting excuses.

     

    blaming it on the mrob play? looked like a catch to me, i didnt even know if was disputed at all. not to mention that the call of offensive pass interference the previous play was pretty clearly crap since roman was in his way.

     

    blaming it on injuries? the vikings have been ravaged all season by injuries too, and its not like we suddenly got healthy the second half. the o line has been banged up and the defense has been in shambles injury-wise.

     

    bottom line is that you guys dominated the first half, and we dominated the second half more. it was a game of halves, and a good game over all. favre couldnt miss a beat in the first half, but give the vikes credit for making changes at the half to take driver mostly out of the game and finding some way to finally get daunte into a rhythm.

     

    good game overall and we finally got you guys by a field goal. do it all over again in a few weeks at your place, and i have no doubt that the results may well be different.

    You can't believe you're getting excuses?

    You're not familiar with Packer fans, are you??? :cheers:

     

    I can't believe you couldn't notice what a huge difference injuries were making. When the Packers were relatively healthy, that first half was a joke 17-0, 260-50 in total yards.

     

    The second half reminded me of the playoff game. The Vikings aren't that terrible of a team. No Walker, no Ferguson. Double team Driver and make some World League receiver who hasn't played a down all year beat you. No Green, no Davenport. Make Fisher beat you. Even with this, the Packers were still moving the ball at points. I haven't even :wall: about the missed field goals yet.

     

    I didn't :wall: about the injuries, I mentioned them. How could you not? You would surely, too, in the same situation.

     

    Culpepper played well and did the things he had to do to win. Congrats on the victory. :rolleyes:


  16. Minnesota needed a 56 yard field goal at home to barely beat the GB second/third string team.

     

    When the Packers were relatively healthy in the first half they were completely dominating both sides of the ball.

     

    Injuries are part of the game. Unfortunately the Packers are getting hit hard. :mad:

×