HellToupee

Who tweeted that , JayChasJohnson?

So he wants the layabouts and freeloaders out . The ones we gave phones , ebt cards and free housing while contributing nothing . Sounds like a workable plan

Always a nice prelude to whip em out Wednesday

Bukele is our greatest ally today

Now there is a ticket Bill Burr would support

I actually believe you. Little squissy not so much

You were given up at the other place as a chronic reporter by the powers that be . Have no reason the same wouldn’t be true here

Come clean gutterboi

I thought Boyo was peak TDS but I was wrong

That plus "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is.

Link

Bukele should just send his head back to appease the media

Because they would get free housing, phones and ebt cards for starters . Some also came to commit crimes Americans couldn’t be bothered to commit

It’s some people’s duty to Fock like bunnies to expand their population

Hayseed

The unhinged lefties …. Donald Trump May Impose Martial Law-Type Order On April 20. What We Know The Insurrection Act of 1807 has the powers to override the Posse Comitatus Act, which is normally in place at all times, and prohibits the US military from participating or interfering in any civil law enforcement. Washington DC: One of the first executive orders that Donald Trump signed when he assumed office as US President on January 20 was to declare a "national emergency" along the southern border of the United States. That order had a rider to it - that President Trump might "invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807" and possibly deploy the military on US soil on April 20 - ninety days after the executive order was signed. The rider or clause in President Trump's executive order on January 20 stated that "Within 90 days of the date of this proclamation, the Secretary of Defence and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a joint report to the President about the conditions at the southern border of the United States and any recommendations regarding additional actions that may be necessary to obtain complete operational control of the southern border, including whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807." WHAT IS THE INSURRECTION ACT OF 1807? According to the Insurrection Act of 1807, the President of the United States may permit the deployment of the military and the US National Guard to ensure that the law is enforced in certain conditions and situations. It authorizes the military to completely suppress any rebellion, uprising, or any act of violence or resistance, including that by citizens. The Insurrection Act has the powers to override the Posse Comitatus Act, which is normally in place at all times, and prohibits the US military from participating or interfering in any civil law enforcement. It also gives the US President - the commander-and-chief of the US armed forces - complete powers to decide if, when, and where to deploy US troops within the United States of America. IS THE INSURRECTION ACT SAME AS MARTIAL LAW? The Insurrection Act however, is somewhat different from a martial law. While a martial law gives complete control of administration and running of the states affairs to a military general - usually the chief of defence staff or the army chief - the Insurrection Act keeps the powers of the state and administration with the US President, who selective uses military powers to enforce law and order. In other words, while a martial law allows the military to take over the role of civilian government in an emergency, the Insurrection Act allows the military to only assist the civilian authorities, not take their place. 'IT CAN BE MISUSED' Legal experts have for long argued that the Insurrection Act of 1807 is archaic, dangerously vague, and in urgent need of reform. According to the Brennan Center for Justice "the Insurrection Act needs a major overhaul." It argues that the Insurrection Act "grants the President the authority to deploy the US military domestically and use it against Americans under certain conditions. While there are rare circumstances in which such authority might be necessary, the law, which has not been meaningfully updated in over 150 years, is dangerously overbroad and ripe for abuse." The advocacy group also says that "Nothing in the text of the Insurrection Act defines 'insurrection,' 'rebellion,' 'domestic violence,' or any of the other key terms used in setting forth the prerequisites for deployment." This, it argues, makes it dangerous for misuse. WHAT WILL HAPPEN ON APRIL 20? With less than a week to go for the 90-day period mentioned in his Jan 20 executive order to be over, a significant chunk of the US population now believes that President Donald Trump will indeed "invoke the Insurrection Act" and deploy the military on April 20. On January 22, 2025, two days after Trump's executive order, the US Department of Defence had announced that it would be sending 1,500 active-duty service members to the southern border along with additional air and intelligence assets to assist other federal agencies and branches of service that are working to enforce border security. In an update on January 29, 2025, Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth affirmed that his department intends to house up to 30,000 criminal migrants at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, following the President's announcement that he would sign an executive order directing the Department of Defence to do so. But since then, no significant update has been shared. The Secretary of Defence and the Secretary of Homeland Security are yet to submit their final report to the US President, and brief him on the mission's achievement so far. That is one of the reasons that several people are convinced the archaic law will soon be enforced to gain "full control of the southern border" - which is the goal of the current administration.

Chump

Says the fake Christian

Bukele is America’s greatest ally

Too bad so sad , he was illegally here

The MSM has been poisoning weaker minds for decades

yes please Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh JUST NOW - STEPHEN MILLER: "There is no upper limit to the agreement. We're going to CONTINUE to send foreign terrorist aliens to El Salvador, as well as to many other countries."

Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh BOOM! Top Trump advisor Stephen Miller just went BERSERK for 3 minutes straight on Fox over the media narrative that Trump must bring home Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador. Miller perfectly debunked this ENTIRE claim that Garcia's deportation was an "error." This entire thing is a MASTERCLASS. "We won the Supreme Court case. Clearly, 9-0, a district court judge said, unconscionably, that the president and his administration have to go into El Salvador and extradite one of their citizens, an El Salvadorian citizen - that would be kidnapping." "That we have to kidnap an El Salvadorian citizen against the will of his government and fly him back to America, which would be an unimaginable act and an invasion of El Salvador's sovereignty. So he appealed to the Supreme Court and it said - clearly, no district court can compel the president to exercise his Article II foreign powers." "DOJ called me after that Supreme Court ruling and they said, this is amazing. We won this case nine zero. We are an excellent standing here. So this has been portrayed wrong for 72 hours in the media." "They said the most a court could ever compel you to do would be to facilitate return, which would basically mean if El Salvador voluntarily sends him back we wouldn't block him at the airport. We would put him back into ICE detention and then he would be deported either back to El Salvador or somewhere else." "In 2019, he was ordered deported. He is a final removal order from the United States. These are things that no one disputes. Where is he from? El Salvador. Where is he a resident and citizen of? El Salvador. Is he here illegally? Yes. Does he have a deportation order? Yes." "A DOJ lawyer who has since been relieved of duty, a saboteur, a Democrat, put into a filing incorrectly that this was a mistaken and removal. It was NOT! This was the right person sent to the right place." "Now some have said, well, but he had a thing called a 'withholding order.' A withholding order means you've been ordered deported, but an immigration judge is saying you cannot go back to a particular country. Here's the thing: if you are a member of a foreign terrorist organization, you cannot have a withholding order." "Since he's in MS-13, there is no withholding order. Furthermore, that gang he is accused of being persecuted by doesn't exist anymore in El Salvador! The 18th Street gang is GONE." "So you have an illegal alien from El Salvador. Bill, where are we supposed to send the illegal alien from El Salvador? To what country?" HOST: Are you convinced he is still a member of MS-13? That was your original charge. MILLER: "Yes. Do you stand by But here's the thing, Bill. Yes, but not only am I convinced of it, not only is El Salvador convinced of it. Bill, he's an illegal alien from El Salvador with a deportation order! So his only options in life, Bill, his only options in life are to be deported to El Salvador or to be deported to some other country. That's IT." @StephenM

Hey dumbass there is a thread for that btw Bad Hombre @joma_gc Cody Balmer, the Harrisburg man accused of attempting to burn down the PA Governor’s mansion was according to him “a registered socialist.” He was neither a Republican or Democrat, and frequently shared links from anarchist accounts on Facebook. Social media posts also show that he supported Black Lives Matter, believed in free universal healthcare as a right, and was a fan of Andrew Yang. He also shared memes criticizing MAGA supporters, Christians, and the 2nd amendment.

Everyone on tv wears makeup including politicians. Don is a certified stud, wears no lifts , hell of a head of hair.. You may not like it but Donald is what male performance looks like. He has the ideal male body