Nate Burleson and Bobby Engram

[Kellys Heroes 0]

I know that Burleson is the #2 right now, but I also notice that Engram is projected to have more points. I just picked Engram up from the FA pool; not hoping for much but he is a good stash away since both Jackson and Burleson are injury prone.

 

Thoughts

[Kellys Heroes 0]

Does anyone think the Engram has any value?

[SmartassBoiler 0]

I bet the projection that says Engram will have more points is assuming an injury from Burleson. I think Burleson's skills fit Seattle's offense well and he should have a productive year.

 

I see Engram as barely draftable in a 12x15 league.

[duaneok66 0]

Does anyone think the Engram has any value?

 

 

He's worth a late round pick; It's not for sure if Djackson will be ready to start the seasaon . . .

[Jay 0]

I don't agree with projections that have Engram having more points. Burleson is a quality #2 wide receiver with even some #1 ability. Engram has never been more than a slot receiver. I think Burleson could even end up with the best numbers in Seattle with Jackson still nursing his knee injury.

[mgs316 14]

Fortunately for some of us, most people will be scared off of Burelson because of last years debacle. It wasn't his fault. The Vikes were a team in shambles. Dante literally was missing wide open receivers all the time. The line was also a mess. Then Nate got hurt and the rest is history. Watching this guy play every week the dude can play, I think he could put up some suprising stats this year. I think he is a very good player and if he's there at a reasonable round, I'm gonna grab him.