groovy gravy 0 Posted September 7, 2006 I tried to make a trade in my league for Williamson but it was vetoed. One manager said that since Williamson was a number one receiver and Troupe was not even drafted that it was not equal. What do you think? Fair trade value here? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dunger 0 Posted September 7, 2006 I tried to make a trade in my league for Williamson but it was vetoed. One manager said that since Williamson was a number one receiver and Troupe was not even drafted that it was not equal. What do you think? Fair trade value here? That trade is fair. In my league, I drafted Troupe and picked up willaimson off the ww Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhoRide2002 0 Posted September 7, 2006 Its always tough to trade WR for a TE unless that TE is named Shockey, Gates or Gonzalez. However I think this is equal value because Troupe is good and Tenn loves to throw to their TE's and Williamson is JUNK!!! http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=229186 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
robotitan 0 Posted September 7, 2006 They should have allowed the trade. I think you got the best of it, but that's part of trading isn't it? See mine Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sidney 0 Posted September 7, 2006 Fair enough, it ain't like Williamson has proven he's all that. Troupe has value at the TE spot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thebook 1 Posted September 7, 2006 I hate leagues with "veto-happy" owners. There's no way that this trade should get vetoed. I doubt any collusion would be happening before the season even starts! Not to mention the fact that Troupe had more yards and twice the TDs that Williamson had last year. Basically, your league's owners are veto-ing based on what they think MIGHT happen this year. Ridiculous. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ruptured groin 0 Posted September 7, 2006 I hate leagues with "veto-happy" owners. There's no way that this trade should get vetoed. I doubt any collusion would be happening before the season even starts! Not to mention the fact that Troupe had more yards and twice the TDs that Williamson had last year. Basically, your league's owners are veto-ing based on what they think MIGHT happen this year. Ridiculous. I agree wholeheartedly. i have never even heard of a vetoed trade before a season starts. imo, the veto should be an option of last resort for situations where it becomes obvious that one owner is in fact sacrificing his team (usually after he is mathematically eliminated from playoff contention) to benefit another. i guess it is possible that this could happen at the outset of the season, but the trade you described certainly doesn't sound like such a situation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kcsportsguy 0 Posted September 7, 2006 Bad league and horrible commish! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cfly12 0 Posted September 7, 2006 Have to agree with everyone else. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=228708 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
