Should this trade be vetoed?

[ullloveit 0]

T Jones for Fuerry and E Johnson.

 

This leaves the team who traded T Jones with only 2 rbs ( A Peterson and K Faulk). It is also a 12 team league so there are no RB's left.

 

Leave link and I will answer yours..

[wggierhart 0]

Thanks for answering mine. I see absolutely no reason, without seeing the other team, that this trade would benefit the guy losing T. Jones. Not that T. Jones is that good, but he is a starting rb and those other two are worthless. I say veto!

[jabone327 0]

dont know bout vetoing it. sounds fishy to me. is the one team stacked enough to get rid of jones? i would put up a vote or something. if he really wants to lose jones for them losers then let him. it just hurting his team.

 

 

 

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=296920

[yegua22 0]

Depends on the rest of the team, as others have said, but it does seem lopsided.

[mrgymrat 0]

From a pts standpoint it seems like none of them produce very much. Can't see where Thomas Jones on a bad Jets team is that big of a steal. Really not much too get worked up about. If you're having to start T Jones then things can't be that good.

[Wheaties 0]

From a pts standpoint it seems like none of them produce very much. Can't see where Thomas Jones on a bad Jets team is that big of a steal. Really not much too get worked up about. If you're having to start T Jones then things can't be that good.

 

That's the way I see it too.

 

Unless the guy getting Thomas Jones is in 1st place and the guy he's trading with is in last place... then maybe this is a depth trade to solidify the #1 spot... but otherwise meh!

[pimptastic69 0]

Unless you are willing to walk up to each owner's face and call them a cheater, don't veto trades.

 

When you overturn a trade, you are saying one of the following bad things:

 

-You're dumb and I'm taking over your team.

 

-You're a cheater.

 

-My offer was better.