bunnerjk 0 Posted October 18, 2011 Give Colston and Starks for Mendenhall and Mike Thomas. Standard ppr. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dzibby08 0 Posted October 18, 2011 Give Colston and Starks for Mendenhall and Mike Thomas. Standard ppr. In a vacuum, it's close to even, maybe giving up a little bit to much due to the PPR scoring. Could you get a slighly better WR? Also, how is the rest of your team set up? If your weak at RB (starting Starks?) and deeper at WR (have a WR to fill in for Colston's spot, not Mike Thomas), it might be worthwhile. Please see mine. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=392885 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bunnerjk 0 Posted October 18, 2011 In a vacuum, it's close to even, maybe giving up a little bit to much due to the PPR scoring. Could you get a slighly better WR? Also, how is the rest of your team set up? If your weak at RB (starting Starks?) and deeper at WR (have a WR to fill in for Colston's spot, not Mike Thomas), it might be worthwhile. Please see mine. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=392885 Actually its a deep 14 team league. I have Foster, Bradshaw(bye), D.Thomas, Starks at RB. I have V.Jackson, Maclin(bye), Colston as my WR's. So I would have to start Mendenhall and M. Thomas this week if I make the trade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dzibby08 0 Posted October 18, 2011 Actually its a deep 14 team league. I have Foster, Bradshaw(bye), D.Thomas, Starks at RB. I have V.Jackson, Maclin(bye), Colston as my WR's. So I would have to start Mendenhall and M. Thomas this week if I make the trade. It's pretty coin-flippy if you start 2 RB, 2 WR and a WR/RB flex. Your "every week" lineup goes from Foster, Bradshaw, Jackson, Maclin, Colston with Thomas/Starks potentially in at flex/backup/bye week to Foster/Bradshaw/Mendy/Jackson/Maclin with Thomas/Thomas as your fill ins. I think you upgrade your starting lineup a little bit by getting Mendenhall, but you hurt yourself for bye weeks and are definitely paying a higher price than Mendy was worth 5 days ago. I'd probably try to delay the trade until next week, see how Mendy looks, and get you through Maclin's bye. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bunnerjk 0 Posted October 18, 2011 It's pretty coin-flippy if you start 2 RB, 2 WR and a WR/RB flex. Your "every week" lineup goes from Foster, Bradshaw, Jackson, Maclin, Colston with Thomas/Starks potentially in at flex/backup/bye week to Foster/Bradshaw/Mendy/Jackson/Maclin with Thomas/Thomas as your fill ins. I think you upgrade your starting lineup a little bit by getting Mendenhall, but you hurt yourself for bye weeks and are definitely paying a higher price than Mendy was worth 5 days ago. I'd probably try to delay the trade until next week, see how Mendy looks, and get you through Maclin's bye. We start 2 RB's and 2WR's with NO flex. Does that change your opinion at all? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
