MikeyNavy 1 Posted November 12, 2015 A team in our league is desperate for a solid TE and initiated discussion with me to trade for one of his WRs. My WRs and TEs are: WR: Green, Diggs, Evans, Hurns TE: Olsen, Gates I might be willing to part with Gates. The only WRs he has that I would be interested in are Fitzgerald and Maclin. He's smart and would make me give up more than a TE for Fitzgerald but I might be able to get Maclin 1-for-1. Would you give up Gates to pick up Maclin...no bye week issues now...just insurance for Olsen injury. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
carmo911 2 Posted November 12, 2015 It comes down to would you start Maclin over any of your current receivers? Personally I wouldn't. But I would start Fitz over at least Evans and Hurns. If he is so desperate for a TE I would hold out for a 1 for 1 for Fitz. He'll come crawling once the deadline is closer. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=450630 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AlToons#1Fan 1 Posted November 12, 2015 I'd hold out. Plus Fitz might not be better than any of those receivers, minus Diggs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
killersquids 3 Posted November 12, 2015 If you only start 2 WRs then I definitely do not make this deal. If you start 3 WRs, then I would think about it for Fitz. I would still lean towards no only because I'm not that high on Fitz for the 2nd half of the season. Maybe do Gates and one of your WRs for a #1 WR (if applicable) http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=450637 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
barber2309 26 Posted November 12, 2015 Agreed, don't do the deal. Doesn't really help you. You are deep enough at WR and might as well protect yourself at TE unless you could get something better. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=450504 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
