james00 4 Posted November 14, 2015 5-4 trades Gary Barnidge David Johnson 2-7 gives Mark Ingram 2-7 traded Doug Martin for nothing earlier in the season. 5-4 team needs an rb bad. 2-7 team doesn't set lineup. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jch5407 2 Posted November 14, 2015 Hopefully your the one getting Ingram. If so its a no brainer. Ingram looks good from here out. Barnidge has a really tough schedule from here out and as long as Manziel keeps coming in he's limited. Or, are you the commish trying to figure out if this is to lopsided? Mine http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=450684&do=findComment&comment=5582537 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
james00 4 Posted November 14, 2015 That was between two teams in my league Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jch5407 2 Posted November 14, 2015 Yeah, I bet they are friends and the 5-4 team convinced the 2-7 team he has no chance to just go ahead and trade him Ingram. Sounds a little fishy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jch5407 2 Posted November 14, 2015 I bet the 5-4 team already has a good TE. So Barnidge and Johnson are just bench players for him. I'm pretty sure there's no way this makes it past the commish on my league. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Saeapp 4 Posted November 14, 2015 Agreed with fellow posters... http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=450694 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
j0ker 3 Posted November 14, 2015 Very shady and our commish would prob veto it immediately. Regardless of how good Barnidge has been it's the second best running back in the league right now. Even if he does need a te I'm sure he could trade someone other than Ingram. Johnson doesn't even exist. Throw in that you said the guy with Ingram doesn't even set his lineup? No way this should be allowed. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=450693 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
