#4 WR help

[hawkvike 0]

I have been using Henry for the last 3-4 weeks as my #4 WR, but with him playing the Oak tough pass defense and Battle playing the putrid GB pass defense I am thinking about making a change. The only reason I am asking is that I have to drop Lundy to start Battle. Lundy is my #4 RB, but could have some value at some point. So my question is, should I drop Lundy and start Battle or should I stick with what I have and start Henry. Thanks for any help. Post a link to your question and I will definitely answer it soon.

[Ryedog 0]

YES! Absolutely start Battle against a B.R.U.T.A.L GB pass defense!

 

Thx for mine but you did not answer the WR portion.

[bkros42 0]

hard to give u a solid answer w/out knowing your team or ne thing.. but

 

i think both will net you about the same, with battle i think a better chance to score

 

but i think palmer can take the bengels down the field often... so a tough decision

[GRAPHIC VIOLENCE 0]

Henry hasn't done much lately so I would go with Battle too.

[maqs31 0]

Tough call when you throw WALIIIIII in the mix! Not sure who your 1-3 backs are, but if you really need the victory, I'd drop and get Battle in there. Even Chad had a day against GB, and I'm a JET fan, so believe me, I know!

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=258307

[ronks 0]

I have been using Henry for the last 3-4 weeks as my #4 WR, but with him playing the Oak tough pass defense and Battle playing the putrid GB pass defense I am thinking about making a change. The only reason I am asking is that I have to drop Lundy to start Battle. Lundy is my #4 RB, but could have some value at some point. So my question is, should I drop Lundy and start Battle or should I stick with what I have and start Henry. Thanks for any help. Post a link to your question and I will definitely answer it soon.

 

It would be better to know your 1-3 RBs, but without knowing that information I would stick with Henry. Lundy might produce a little in future so I wouldn't want to lose him for a fraction of an upgrade (if any) at WR.

[dachtor 0]

I don't know man...... Battle may be a decent SF option with a favorable matchup but I think SF is going to use a heavy dose of Gore vs. that GB defense.

 

If you need Lundy at all the rest of the year, I wouldn't drop him. Tough to understand why you can't drop Henry and pick up Battle.

[hawkvike 0]

My top three RB's are Parker, McGahee, and Betts. I can only use 2 of them per week. I don't want to drop Henry because I will use him over Battle the rest of the year and unless something unusual happens, I will not need Lundy. I just want to know if Battle will give me an upgrade over Henry or not?

[Groundhog 24]

definitely Battle. Great matchup for him, terrible matchup for Henry, recently made worse by more injuries to the Bengals O-line.

[Madler 6]

I would go with Battle too. Henry has not done much last few times.

 

Thanks for mine.

[Nomad99 743]

I have been using Henry for the last 3-4 weeks as my #4 WR, but with him playing the Oak tough pass defense and Battle playing the putrid GB pass defense I am thinking about making a change. The only reason I am asking is that I have to drop Lundy to start Battle. Lundy is my #4 RB, but could have some value at some point. So my question is, should I drop Lundy and start Battle or should I stick with what I have and start Henry. Thanks for any help. Post a link to your question and I will definitely answer it soon.

 

 

I say Henry.......he is off again/on again......but sneaky good sometimes. 2 weeks ago he found paydirt twice. Oak has a decent pass D but they will look to cover Chad & whosyourmamma.....I think Henry hauls in a deep one this week

[cjsks 0]

I like Henry better even without factoring in the loss of Lundy. Oaklands secondary is obviously good but I don't know if they can blanket a recieving corp as deep as cincy's...

 

Good luck!

 

Here's mine:

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=258233