JagFan 164 Posted October 25, 2009 I see great risk in both. I will answer yours. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
montana 89 Posted October 25, 2009 I think i'd go forte - as you said, both risks. but at least you know forte will get everything chi has (maroney or BGE?) http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=355088 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GACWALK 0 Posted October 25, 2009 I would stick with Forte...you never know what's going to happen with NE running the ball. Forte will get 98% of whatever the Chicago run game gets. Plus, Cincy defense is pretty banged up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RonsRockers 0 Posted October 25, 2009 Williams/Stewart last week 250+ yards # tds against the Yucks! Once the Pats are up a few TDS Maroney should pick up alot of yards. I like Maroney this week Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Militia 0 Posted October 25, 2009 Forte. New England has too many backs, and they have traveled a long ways this week, plus taking in the sights, and being so far away from home. I'm still unsure about these overseas matches and what it means to FF. Until there is more to go by, I say ya bench Maroney. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steiner 0 Posted October 25, 2009 Hate to muddy the waters more but I emphatically say Maroney. Contrary to one response, all the NE back are very banged up. Maroney should play a huge role against a very BAD TB Def that is horrible against the run. My post needs help, thanks: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=355091 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
