posty

Oh that is going to make some people angry... Philip Rivers doesn't deserve the Hall because he doesn't have a ring, even though almost every career stat is better than Eli...

May? I am surprised it lasted this long already...

I think peenie needs to stop watching sports...

They won't put 3rd down down if it was second or fourth down... That would be silly...

And Joe Flacco...

Oh don't do that... You will have HT yelling at you... @RaiderHaters Revenge He will get in, but the Hall is already watered down big time, Eli getting in will just add to it...

God forbid that have the play clock there as well... They NEVER have a 3 for 3rd quarter or 3rd down... They also will never have 3rd for just "3rd down", they always put down out there... There is no way to be confused...

This...

I think he talks about his .500 career record as well, which is terrible for a quarterback... But what else are you going to look at? How about passer rating? Eli had to have a good... What? 84.1? Lower than Matt Schaub, Jameis Winston, Case Keenum and tied with Joe Flacco? I guess Flacco is a lock for the Hall of Fame then since he won a Super Bowl...

"The only winning move is not to play."

So does this mean that Eli made his team do all the work to win the titles and just because he had a good game he ends up taking all the glory?

How did Joe Namath get in? BTW, we aren't saying he won't get in, we know he will... We are just saying that when you look at his numbers, they don't pass the eye test...

Of course he did... He is using common sense...

/thread Raiders won this thread... I guess some like the Hall of Fame be just average...

Wow... Just... Wow... RIvers has better stats across the board than Manning and saying he isn't Hall worthy just because he didn't win a ring is ludicrous...