5-Points

And you keep confusing Musk, the man, with X, the company. His company is politically neutral, meaning he doesn't use it to favor one side or the other. That doesn't mean he can't have, or as you seem to be struggling with, express, his own opinions. He's not preventing anyone on his platform from expressing their political views, whether he shares those views or not. I'm not sure why that is so difficult for you to understand. Let's try this. Elon = person with political views. X = company with no political affiliation It ain't rocket science. That's his other company.

Wordle 1,206 3/6* 🟨 🟨🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Framed #941 🟩 https://framed.wtf

First, Jerrah needs to fire his current incompetent GM and hire a guy who knows WTF he's doing. Then, have that guy fire McCarthy and hire a young, innovative HC who has the authority to tell Stephen to go fock himself with regards to personnel. I'm 54, unless everything I just laid out happens soon, I'll be dead before the Cowboys win another SB.

And I still think you're confusing his freedom of speech with how he runs his company. The facts say he's capable of one without compromising the other.

Somebody needs to take Mike McCarthy's red flag away from him. He sucks at challenges.

Wow. You have a hard on for a guy who suspended a guy for live tweeting the whereabouts of his private plane that his family flies on? Seriously? Given the multiple recent attempts on Trump's life from batshit crazy leftists, I'd say his concerns were warranted.

Which Musk hasn't done. So his whole argument is invalid. Yet he persists.

Well of course, if he's speaking, as the owner of a company, being worried about the banning of his company, he's speaking on behalf of his company. You don't think he should be able to do that?

I somehow pissed off the football gods so they're delaying the start of SNF. 3AM comes early mutherfockers!!!

You continue to fail to recognize that a company can maintain political neutrality while the owner of said company can express his/her political opinions. It's understandable, given nobody on the left has ever been able to pull it off. They always run their companies based on their personal political views, to include refusing service to those who openly hold opposing political views. However, Musk isn't that guy. He will allow you to express your political views on his platform, even if he disagrees with them. That is the juxtaposition that you can't wrap your head around because it's completely foreign to you. You're used to the suppression of opposing views so you can't fathom that not being the norm. Musk isn't normal, if you haven't noticed.

He didn't make the rules. He's just playing the game as it is today. Can't cry about it now if you didn't cry about it then.

No. I think he spent a considerable amount of his own personal wealth to purchase what he believed to be, or should be, a free speech platform and any attempt to ban X is an attempt to ban freedom of speech. In short, as an African American, he cares more about the U.S. Constitution than do Democrat politicians and their voters.

I understand them. But much like Elon, I refuse to play by them. It makes them so mad.

His opinions are his. Your opinions are your's. You are both allowed to express those opinions on his social media site. Why is it hypocritical for him to express his political views on a site that he allows you to express your political views? You make no sense.

There is clearly a difference whether you choose to admit it or not. Twitter, under Jack Dorsey, was quite a different social media site than it is under Elon Musk. That is the difference. There is freedom of expression allowed by all sides now. Whereas there was mass suppression of conservative expression in 2020. You can refuse to admit it, or say you didn't see it, but that doesn't make it true. It just make you suspect.

Are you focking serious? After all the lies and character assassination the left engaged in, including multiple buIIshit impeachments, you think he should've showed up to Biden's inauguration? He stayed away for good reason.

My offer stands, Mike.

Wait, what? We have mods here? That must be hilarious. Can I volunteer my services?

Well, yeah. Obviously.

That's my point. Blacks, if left to their own devices, would prolly be doing a lot better in this country. But they've been coddled and told by the left that they're inferior and must be aided by the federal government in order to succeed. But they haven't, in spite of the "help" from the left. The left has always seen them as inferior and incapable of doing for themselves what the left believes they should do "for them." When, in fact, it's what the left has been doing "for them" that has kept them incapable of doing for themselves. Take away the handouts and force them to compete on a level playing field. They would adjust and begin to do for themselves what the government has promised to do for them for generations but has "failed" to deliver upon. It would change their behavior and voting habits, as a result. Which is something many of them are starting to recognize. As are many of the politicians on the left. Hence the importation of millions of new voters from third world countries who haven't had nearly the same opportunity to decide their own destiny. However, those new voters are willing to work for it and so their allegiance to the dem party won't last nearly as long.

Edited for accuracy.

That's why I laugh when dumbshits want to compare America's "gun problem" with other countries. They fail to include the one variable that those other countries don't suffer from. White kids have grown up with guns for generations in this country and they weren't slaughtering each other in ever increasing numbers.

Homogeneity is their greatest strength.

That would mean I had $150 billion and I wouldn't give a sh!t about loyalty. But yeah, if I gave you $10B you would be loyal to me or you wouldn't be around long.

Wordle 1,205 5/6* 🟨🟨🟨 🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Framed #940 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟩 https://framed.wtf