blick

I give him credit for being at the right place at the right time. That either took help or surveillance. I give him virtually no credit for the actual shooting. Any average gun owner should be able to do what he did. He's done a pretty good job of disappearing.

Thanks for posting. It's interesting to hear the thoughts of someone with his IQ that came from a blue-collar background and hasn't been indoctrinated by academia. I'll admit that I certainly don't the whole thing.

Yep. All the same. Just different agendas and die hard sheepeople followers.

To be clear, I’ll be voting for Trump tomorrow. But I’d prefer my president not give BJs to microphones among other ridiculous things.

I don’t know who’s going to win, but I can tell you who will lose, all of us.

58008

One of the problems facing gas production in PA is the lack of FERC controlled interstate pipeline expansion needed to get gas to markets, especially in the northeast. That can be correct at the federal level.

Too bad JD isn’t at the top of the ticket.

This is simply not true.

I stand by my original statement that I don’t give a rats ass about someone looking for a reason to be offended.

This is just not true.

I don’t give a rats ass about people looking for reasons to be offended. The WORDS weren’t used with racial intent.

As extreme as it sounds, that’s the appropriate punishment for treason.

I said they were AT a riot. I give up. They were arrested for no reason. Just peacefully protesting.

I stand by my assessment. The "protesters" were at a riot otherwise they wouldn't have been arrested.

She's a pandering fraud. By extension, why only for the riots if she cares so much about the poor?

You're kidding, right? Even if she did, it is not her role to determine guilt. Its a very bad look. Just to add, these people put themselves in that position. If they truly wanted to "peacefully protest", why would they allow themselves to be in a riot?

Who is she to judge that they were peaceful?

You missed my point. She should not have advocated for raising money to help anyone involved that mess. She should have let the justice system work. She didn't do it because she cares about the arrested. She only did it to score politically. She's a fraud.

It was clearly for political points but it's too easy to connect the dots between "peaceful protests" and the crap show that happened. In her position, she should have denounced the violence and not got involved.

Why would she be involved at all?

Bullshit. You’ll believe anything that fits your narrative.

Seems like a very broad generalization, but to each his own.

This is simply not true.

I appreciate your continued effort to remind us to include God and church in our busy lives. But this post is condescending and ignorant.