thegeneral
Members-
Content Count
21,087 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
20
Everything posted by thegeneral
-
Brock Bower does the Trump dance after scoring. Then Raiders PR steps in.
thegeneral replied to seafoam1's topic in The Geek Club
This thread is about the two dudes jerked off dance catching on. Is that what Bowers did? -
Brock Bower does the Trump dance after scoring. Then Raiders PR steps in.
thegeneral replied to seafoam1's topic in The Geek Club
It’s ok you wish you were on the receiving end of that chain yank -
he does have an unfortunate look to him.
-
Yeah. Besides that you should look into his political leanings and his demeanor as a politician.
-
Picking Matt Foxking Gaetz isn’t a good harbinger of events wouldn’t you say
-
Brock Bower does the Trump dance after scoring. Then Raiders PR steps in.
thegeneral replied to seafoam1's topic in The Geek Club
Acuck says what? -
He fired how many because they wouldn’t do that
-
Yeah I don’t get your message. We don’t have any similar cases. Just conservatives upset that Trump got busted and a million whatabouts. Clinton got dragged for years. Edwards who you brought up too. Trump gets his and it’s a bunch of tears and how the free world is ending.
-
Brock Bower does the Trump dance after scoring. Then Raiders PR steps in.
thegeneral replied to seafoam1's topic in The Geek Club
You want to jerk two guys you go for it! Trump’s America! -
Brock Bower does the Trump dance after scoring. Then Raiders PR steps in.
thegeneral replied to seafoam1's topic in The Geek Club
Is this Don’s renowned jerking two guys dance? -
He wouldn’t do anything without Trump’s blessing so not sure about the implications there in terms of the Speaker. I agree with all your other points. He’s such a crazy pick, that has little chance of getting through it makes me think there are various ulterior motives.
-
Bill Clinton reached a settlement, they released details of the settlement. He paid the money. Trump didn’t have a settlement, he claims it’s a lie, these payments were hidden. That this was election interference is debatable, but don’t see how one can argue he wasn’t trying to hide this for any other reason. Those are differences. Not sure how this isn’t clear. It being a political winning issue is a separate issue.
-
If you don’t see the differences I’d say it’s you that has the problem. If you want to argue that it shouldn’t matter that these dudes bang skanks and pay them off well that’s just fine. Trump got caught trying to hide his before the election. He hid the payments, lied about it. The classified docs is even more cut and dry.
-
The comparison to Clinton isn’t in the same ballpark. This was why Trump was busted. “Clinton and Trump’s cases have key differences, according to legal experts. Clinton’s $850,000 payment to Paula Jones in 1998 settled a civil lawsuit. The payment was public and legal, and the funds did not come from the government, nor did they amount to a campaign contribution. By comparison, the payment in Trump’s case was through a shell company and reimbursed by Trump, whose company logged the reimbursements as legal expenses in the final weeks of his 2016 presidential campaign.” Link John Edwards is more comparable. He went to trial. It ended his political career. Somehow Trump is the choice of the family values party
-
It’s an opinion piece meant to provide thought for overall discussion. It’s not news. I typically believe news reported in the NYT.
-
He’s deadman walking. Next AG nom is being discussed by Trump team.
-
Is there an actual example, like we have with Trump and the donations to Stormy, or just the slippery what if slope?
-
I don’t know if there are any answers. I am pretty certain Dem lawmakers would be very fine with amnesty you described and that would get their vote in Congress.
-
The important part here is what you are doing with these people and how you are doing it. “The good ones” are getting rounded up by cops, military, what have you and dumped at the border?
-
When you parse sections from the middle of another convo this happens. The poster I was talking to and I were getting into what this means to deport criminals. Some people think only deport people who have done crimes outside of coming here, start there then do others. Some think they are all the same since they are here illegally and deport everyone.
-
I don’t think the people making this up have the answers either. It will be determined in part by public opinion. Things like the kids being US citizens or how people are rounded up or the first time an ICE agent roughs up a woman or the wrong person is scooped up, or any number of complications arises will bring this whole process into question and becomes a matter of public debate. This could become very ugly with the spokesperson for the whole thing being DJT. Once outside of people with face tattoos who have been arrested getting bounced I see this ending badly for those who think that 10’s of millions of people are being deported.
-
That seems to add more effort tracking when they came in. How would you even know this? Yeah I could see that being an issue. If it is say a proven rapist well I wouldn’t worry about that. Honestly surprised why they aren’t already kicked out. I’d be more worried about issues that come up over accidents or with bad cops. ICE picking up millions of people is going to have a ton of issues. How are they going to do this, who are they targeting? Some redneck cop start pulling people over because they are brown, is there a number to call to report people, is there a process to hold people while this is figured out. The aforementioned kids who are now US citizens. This is a disaster in the making.
-
Do you think this Congressional report about this should be released? The guy is up to be the face of the nation for legal matters.
