thegeneral

When you picture a dude who pays hookers…it’s this guy. Straight out of central casting.

We will see. This is rife for disaster. If I were running this I’d start with bouncing people who are in prison who have face tattoos. Easy win. The actual plan is unknown. This was a big problem in Trump 1.0.

This is a perfect example of the details.

Add something useful or go fock off, gramps.

If we are talking people who have been arrested for major crimes and dumping them someplace outside the country, i think most would consider that an easy win. Even this has potential for huge fockups. I do think people will look past that to a certain extent. The government, cops, have been known to mess up a three car parade however. With anything of this scale it will be prone to disaster in the details, someone on the ground having to actually execute the plan.

Can you explain what you mean in the last sentence and how you would see that playing out?

This will be the blue print, right? In actual practice it has potential to get all focked up.

This will be a one of the major issues of this administration day 1.

He “truther” about it. I think how this plays out is still fluid.

Update!

This gives Ukraine some actual leverage to negotiate with. Should have been done a year ago.

You should do Mitch McConnell and picking Supreme Court justices now. Classic liberalism!

Oh Peefoam.

We both do very well. Blessed! Sorry you are a shut-in, grandpa.

I wish them luck.

We’ll see. I’m hoping for the best.

What an organization they have.

Healthy, happy, and financially came through the worst economy of our lives richer than ever. All my friends too. It’s crazy. Now finding out that Republicans are no longer the party of corporations Everything coming up roses!

Such a weirdo

I’m doing quite well dipshit

Riiight In this case I hope so. However, tub of shet Trump has shown zero interest in this, dude certainly eats all this crap, until he needed to make a deal with RFK. Republicans in general have shown almost zero interest in this.

Why have all these left leaning states went on their own to ban chemicals? Now that Republicans are on board we should really start seeing some new laws and regulations clamping down on corporations come through Congress, right?

That was an oddly worded section. I agree. Overall, the article talks about how historically this has been an issue that was left leaning in regards to Congress. Is that incorrect? Now that Republicans are joining in this issue we should see some progress in Congress.

Can the Feds also take a look at why this is going on: US appeals court kills ban on plastic containers contaminated with PFAS Would be nice to not have this stuff leeching into products.