Jump to content

thegeneral

Members
  • Content Count

    21,104
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

Everything posted by thegeneral

  1. Now you see why this broad quit her cushy job. It’s called conviction.
  2. Being a US citizen is the big hang up for you
  3. thegeneral

    Stock Market bubble - will crash

    Per usual you have no clue. Why don’t you fock off to your little cow pasture and count your nickels like a hermit.
  4. There’s the news section to collect all your information and make decisions. There’s any number of resources to research to make your decision. For all I know this paper does have Op-Ed’s that give an alternate opinion. The lady quit because she disagrees with what the owner wants to do in Editorial. Isn’t that what you would want to have happen? I really don’t give a fock what the LA Times does I just don’t understand what the issue is here.
  5. What is the purpose of an Editorial section of a newspaper? They were told to list out information about the candidates and make no endorsement by the owner. They choose not to do this and instead did nothing. This lady quit and said why. Team Donald took advantage of this situation by saying something to the effect that even the LA Times won’t endorse Kamala. I think that would be a great reason why this woman no longer wanted to be associated with the editorial portion of the paper.
  6. They endorsed them for 90 years, stopped in 1972, then started again in 2008.
  7. thegeneral

    Get ready for the October Surprise

    He released it in June 2008. All the wackos couldn’t get over it and were obsessed with the long form. A certain prominent dummy continued to think it was all made up until like 2016
  8. Should have a presser at Four Seasons Landscaping for old times sake.
  9. thegeneral

    Get ready for the October Surprise

    Fair enough. I could see that. Would you agree after the birth certificate was released in like 2008 that was the end of it and the rest was a bit silly at best, something much darker at worst?
  10. thegeneral

    Get ready for the October Surprise

    The publisher claims that wasn’t the case. After he put out the birth certificate that should have been the end of it. Yet some kept on it, even sending their best people to get to the bottom of it. So strange as to why they would do that!
  11. thegeneral

    Stock Market bubble - will crash

    If you think this is somehow tied to Trump how do you explain things blowing up for years?
  12. thegeneral

    Stock Market bubble - will crash

    Hopefully TSLA sets the tone for the big boys earnings reports over the next few days.
  13. thegeneral

    Stock Market bubble - will crash

    I vowed to never hold them again after picking the wrong side a couple times in a row. What a day indeed.
  14. No. That was in 2010. They endorsed her for Senate after she had that gig.
  15. I think that is exactly what she was saying. She wanted to make it clear that the editorial portion of the paper is being giving direction as to not endorse anyone. The Trump campaign made a statement about the how the LA times wasn’t supporting Kamala as they have in all her other political races (which interestingly enough wasn’t true - not interesting that they focked that up because they always do - but that the paper endorsed her opponent when she ran for AG).
  16. thegeneral

    Get ready for the October Surprise

    I think I will disagree.
  17. I think her point is that they were not endorsing a candidate in this election, when they had in all others, so perhaps it would look odd and some could create their own narrative as to why.
  18. You have a newsroom that presents news. You have an editorial board that gives opinion. That the editorial department wants to do their thing independently - in this case endorse a candidate - does not seem unusual. If anything she is showing some integrity TBH in quitting some cush job, so not really getting how this is a bad thing.
  19. I read that he outright told them not to endorse a candidate. Then she quit and said why. So what’s the problem?
  20. Yeah going to disagree here. Don’t really know the structure of the LA Times but if they have an editorial dept and the owner is telling these people what to say, then yeah I can see the editorial person deciding they want to quit. What is wrong with that? Politically now you get a Trump campaign saying that the LA Times won’t endorse Kamala - her own hometown paper!!111!!! Oh muh gerd! This move by the owner if anything is helping diminish the reputation of the paper, not the other way around.
  21. thegeneral

    Fox edited Trump interview answers.

    If Trump wins this place will be overrun because his daily fockups will be on full display Dude’s brain is going to be totally gone soon.
×