Casual Observer

Go get the breakdown on the causes and age groups of the excess deaths. Also, don't let me find out that 160% or 170% of the expected excess deaths is an extra 20,000 old people dead, especially after 90% vaxxed, as you claim. The vaxx didn't have an effect on omicron, nor help old people, did it? Here's NYC: https://www.nyc.gov/assets/doh/downloads/pdf/covid/omicron-variant-report-jan-13-22.pdf Omicron spike lasted for what, a month?

. When was the last time you were inside a courtroom, little buddy?

Is he so short that he sounds like he inhaled helium?

Tim, You're back to saying it hit the elderly hard. So does the flu. Sit down and shut up. You're insulting our collective intelligence.

Who the fock really knows, Tim? What I am pointing out is how you used supposedly unvaccinated Hong Kong to point out how deadly Covid was, when, in reality, a large portion of the population was vaccinated, especially at the time of some supposed spike in deaths you're trying to show us. You know, I really like how you repeatedly ask some dumb-ass follow up question that attempts to deflect from the issue at hand every time you get caught lying. aRe yOU SAYing thEre wAs nO spIkE iN dEAthS? If there were, it was probably attributable to the impairment of immune function post-vaxx, not Covid, especially given the percentage of their population that was vaccinated and how super-effective these vaccines are according to you, right, Tim?

Nah, you try to dilute the concept of grooming with your inane politically-slanted posts. This is an obsession with you.

Yawn. The elderly in Hong Kong, Tim. The elderly. Spike in deaths in Hong Kong in March/April of 2022? Lie to us some more, Tim, we all love it when you do that. What percentage of Hong Kong population is vaccinated? Fully vaccinated (two doses) accounted for 86.3% of the total population by December 31, 2021. Both HK and SG approved SINOVAC and BioNTech as two vaccine options. As of March 1, 2022, 90.5% of the total population received full vaccination, with 67.6% receiving a booster dose (Our World In Data, 2022; WHO

Why do you constantly and obsessively enter or create threads suggesting grooming is a fiction or non-existent, except when it supposedly comes from the right?

Life free of vaxx induced myocarditis and blood clots?

You're often contradicting yourself. In unvaccinated Hong Kong, Omicron impacts were essentially indistinguishable from the Flu. Claiming Omicron hit the elderly hard is disingenuous; common illnesses hit the elderly hard (like the flu).

I don't listen to that neocon twerp.

This is the definition of "flailing" Tim. Here's my quote, again: "This is more casuistry from you. I said nothing about the total hospitalizations, though if Omicron was so deadly we could expect that number to be going up, right? And if we could expect that number to be going up, we would expect the percentage to be going up accordingly, too. But it wasn't, the percentage was actually going down." Did hospitalizations increase for reasons other then Covid at the same time Omicron hit, Tim? If so, what was or were the reasons? If the percentage of Covid hospitalizations went down, I think that correlates pretty well with a decrease in either infections or severity of Covid strain and it has to be the latter because, as you just stated, Omicron was so contagious/transmissible. Or are you going to tell me there was a massive increase in accidents that required hospitalization is the reason that percentages for those with Covid decrease? I wouldn't put it past you and to have some jackass from Twitter somehow backing that up. Moreover, you're not running away from your "Hong Kong" post where you told us deadly Omicron was, especially for the unvaxxed, which was a crock.

Did you have a stroke in the middle of typing your post?

I don't know about your mother-in-law, Tim, but you don't really provide any reasons why I or anyone else should believe you. Let's assume that's true, though. This causes you to launch into some kind of crusade to vaxx the Geek Club and have all these Tweets and other studies at your fingertips ready to reply to posters here? Sorry, I don't buy that.

Tim, This is more casuistry from you. I said nothing about the total hospitalizations, though if Omicron was so deadly we could expect that number to be going up, right? And if we could expect that number to be going up, we would expect the percentage to be going up accordingly, too. But it wasn't, the percentage was actually going down. Now you're trying to say "well it was much more contagious" while contradicting your point about people having immunity gained from either the vaxx or having Covid already from your post above. This is the problem; you say contradictory things, get caught in saying contradictory things and then try to change the parameters (goalposts) after you've been caught. Omicron 100% was as mild as a cold. Refer back to the Hong Kong study you posted which confirms Omicron really only affected the very elderly, which many common illnesses like cold and flu also do.

You're not a free-thinker; you're carrying the water for someone else. Who appointed you to try to "change minds" here? Why do you always have some kind of Twitter post at the immediate ready to respond to a poster here? This is not normal and implies some kind of paid arrangement. You've contradicted yourself so many times and been shown wrong so many times that you now only serve as a punching bag. What delusions are you under where you think you're proving people wrong? Why continue the charade when no one believes you? This is a neurotic and pathological obsession that you should try to rid yourself of.

Tim, You are on record here stating that Omicron was deadly, full-stop. In reality, Omicron was mild like a cold, full-stop. Look at the graph you posted and tell me when Omicron was prevalent? Because at the same time you were trying to stretch Delta into Omicron territory (time of prevalence) and blaming Delta for deaths at that time, which you are also on record as doing several times. Now you're trying to add "I've always said that Omicron was mild for those without prior immunity" while you've also claimed that Omicron was deadly, without qualification. Sorry, Tim, you're only saying that now and you're denying objective reality and changing your tune to try salvage any credibility you think you have left. You don't have any credibility left. The graph you posted shows that when Omicron hit, hospitalizations for Covid go down. That is because: 1) Omicron was mild and 2) Omicron squeezed out the other strains.

Fortunately you don't get to make those calls, shlomo-come-lately.

Of course Tim claims that a book written by someone named Posner is the best.

I'm still waiting for an answer to this one, Tim.

Oh good, perhaps now we can put to rest the fraud you've been pushing about Omicron being deadlier than the prior strains, which you've done several times here. Tough to keep track of your lies when you lie all the time.

I wouldn't be caught dead drinking a Bud Light except if they served it in a bottle and you were standing next to me so I could hit you over the head with it.

Tomorrow I'm going to hop out of bed at 6 AM like a kid on Christmas to post a complaint about some view held by Nicole Wallace or Rachel Maddow.

I have yet to see a concerted right wing effort at grooming like we see from the left. Have you? You are such a dirtbag that you changed the title of the article you posted from "Indian Catholic Priest" to to your link of "Right wing Catholic priests". Even then, you claim to send your imaginary child to a Catholic school, lol.

Hey, would you shut the fock up on a Sunday morning. Everyone you don't like is a POS.