The Real timschochet

As expected Tillis folded. Hegseth wins confirmation. Pretty embarrassing for the GOP.

It’s not only debatable it’s wrong. But I’ve said my piece. I’ve been defeated too. As you guys say there’s a new sheriff in town. Let’s see how he does. I can complain (and I will) but I can’t stop what’s happening.

All violent criminals without documents should serve appropriate prison terms and then be deported. I’ve never argued for anything else.

No. He might still have slipped through the cracks. Another bad guy might have slipped through the cracks. I don’t believe the cracks can ever be adequately closed to stop all of this sort of crime. And at least for me the price is too high. I’m not willing to tear apart the lives of innocent people. You know what societies have very few rapes and murders, HT? Police states. Soviet Russia. Nazi Germany. The streets were safe from violent crime. I’m not willing to pay that price.

It was a rhetorical question.

I never said her murder wasn’t preventable. I have no idea if it was or it wasn’t. I think that what Trump wants to do is morally wrong and bad for the country.

Could be. But this is a moral issue for me. It’s a core conviction. So I’m stuck with it.

Sure. But that’s the prerogative of her constituents. Why shouldn’t they have that right?

It is too bad. Not for me personally but for the country. Hopefully we will find our way again. It may take a while.

SCOTUS is a different issue. I wouldn’t mind them there. But for elected positions, aren’t elections themselves term limits?

It’s not humorous. It’s awful. And some of us will fight against it until the policies are once again changed for the better.

No I reject your argument. If we had more organized border policies, which I would prefer, it still would not prevent violent criminals from coming here. Some will still get through. I’m not even convinced less would get through. But I detest Trump’s “solutions” to this issue, because I think they harm innocent people. And I’m not willing to do that based on the possibility that a bad dude MIGHT have been prevented from killing Laken Riley. And guys like @HellToupee think that because of my rejection of their draconian ideas I am therefore personally responsible for Laken Riley’s death. That’s bullsh!t, it’s not an “inconvenient truth. It’s crap.

It won’t happen of course but I would support it. Term limits have never appealed to me. Let the voters choose who they want. If we want 4 more years of Trump, or Obama, or whoever, why not?

Democrats have no power. We can criticize Republican actions, and no doubt we will, but you guys are wasting time focusing on us. We lost the Presidency, the House, the Senate. It’s your show. Fix things, bring down prices like you promised. We can’t stop you.

You’ve made this argument before. I thoroughly reject it. Now what??

You keep repeating this argument and insulting me at the same time. I don’t agree with you and I’m choosing to ignore your insults. The question of impeachment is purely theoretical, since it’s never going to happen, and it’s therefore not worth further discussion beyond what we’ve done. It’s a distraction from the main issue which is whether or not this was a bad act.

The stakes will never be higher than beating the 80s Boston Celtics.

Your bullsh!t is so tiring. Especially now since so many innocent people are at risk due to this President’s heinous and evil policies which you approve of. But anyhow here you go: https://immigrationforum.org/article/illicit-fentanyl-and-drug-smuggling-at-the-u-s-mexico-border-an-overview/ You have to scroll down to paragraph 8 which reads: The data indicates most smuggling of illicit drug substances into the U.S. happens at ports of entry, not between Satisfied? Now shut the fock up. Everything you believe about this issue is wrong. You’ve bought into Trump’s lies and fearmongering. You’re a dupe and an idiot. Unfortunately right now there are millions like you.

Why do you want this guy? Just to piss off the libs? Or do you truly think he’s qualified for the job and will do a good job?

I don’t get it Voltaire. Why are you willing to defend this? Maybe it’s not an impeachable offense. But do you really like the fact that some of these dudes who viciously attacked police officers are getting off free here?

Al Capone’s vault part 2.

And FTR with regard to the bolded I think it’s both.

Well no I won’t admit to that. Lol FTR a lot of people I’ve heard on the radio today, including some legal experts share my current insanity: they also think Trump should be impeached for this. Mostly progressive of course…

I’m not even sure Aileen Cannon would uphold it.

So what was the point? Does anyone truly believe any court in the land is going to uphold this executive order?