The Real timschochet

Well the truth is he IS your master in terms of coherent argument. But then that’s not a difficult goal.

I think “Boyo” stands for “This dude has too many facts on his side, I can’t argue against him, so I’ll just make fun of his use of language.” Is that it?

Don Gaseone

Plus if there was no sex why pay her off?

“I didn’t have sex with her and I don’t know why Michael Cohen paid her $140,000. That was his decision: And I don’t know why I reimbursed him.”

Are you autistic or something? On the spectrum?

Not false. Just unverified. Personally I don’t want to verify it. But you can if you really need to.

Trump’s attorneys facing a special challenge:

So stupid. Yes in your terms I am to the left of Bill Maher on the issue of drag queens reading to children. On most economic issues I am far to the right of Bill Maher. This is why your pronouncements are so dumb.

https://readingpartners.org/blog/drag-story-hour/ Good wrote up here. Some of you need to get a clue.

Yo, WTF is agony with YOU?? You seek to instill your own fear and bigotry of gay people in your children. Thats sick man. Hopefully society wins out and your kids will be more woke than you are:

It’s a really good album. Not as good as folklore or Evermore but nearly. Second best album I’ve heard this year (after Cowboy Carter).

I never hated them. I’m not one of “those liberals”. I always kind of agreed with them. (Not in every instance- I was opposed to the Iraq war- but as a general rule.)

I enjoy Mariah Carey and she is a huge pop star. But is there anything rock and roll about her? The band that sticks out to me is Jethro Tull. Probably because I love them. But they’re unique, a mixture of hard rock, progressive rock, and folk. They had plenty of hits. Seems like an obvious choice.

Strongly disagree. I would like children to learn that there is nothing wrong with being a drag queen. They are normal decent people who have chosen a certain lifestyle and profession, like other entertainers. The best way for children to learn this truth is to be around them. Not by taking them to a show- I don’t think it’s appropriate to expose children to any kind of sexual entertainment- but having the drag queens read to them at libraries, speak to them- that’s a good thing and I’m all for it.

I’m sorry about your daughter and I wish the best for you and her. But she has a disease. Comparing her disease ti a drag queen who is a normal healthy person who chooses to live a flamboyant lifestyle, is frankly offensive.

Lol I have no opinion on this issue, or the dude who posted this, or the guy he’s responding to. But this is a terrific insult.

There are many conservatives, including Trump supporters, who still believe in internationalism when it comes to our foreign commitments. Let’s call these, for lack of a better term, “Reagan conservatives”. Mike Pence, Nikki Haley, there are plenty of others. They agree with Trump on almost every other issue: immigration, tax concerns, social issues. But they don’t agree on isolationism. Apparently Mike Johnson may be one of these. They’re losing the struggle, much like Democratic supporters of Israel are losing the struggle. This was probably a last gasp for both: the right and left are taking over the two parties.

I fundamentally disagree with you on two points here. First I believe there is tremendous value to having drag queens read books to young children. Please scroll up and read my response to @Nomad99 regarding this question. Second, I don’t believe that drag queens, and gay people in general, should be regarded as “abnormal” by society. Indeed my goal is to have them be treated as normal.

Let’s grant your point for the sake of discussion. I don’t hear conservatives calling for banning Boy Scout meetings or making the Catholic Church illegal. Yet they seem hellbent on preventing all possible contact between drag queens and young children. So why the focus on this one group, if pedophilia is your main concern? The only logical conclusion I can come up with is fear and bigotry of homosexuality. But you’re welcome to come up with an alternative explanation for the focus on one but not the others.

You’re right, totally disgraceful. Im sure you’ll be able to come up with plenty of examples of defendants in felony trials who are allowed to publicly criticize the judge, witnesses, and family members.

Trump says this too: the exact same wording in fact. What has this judge done that is disgraceful?

was Jane Fonda a traitor? We’re not at war with Russia. Even if we we were, people would still be allowed to disagree with that. Being a traitor, or committing treason, is a big deal. The Rosenbergs were traitors. Tokyo Rose committed treason. You need to do something pretty awful.

Good morning. I’m not going to concede your point. I have heard medical experts say the opposite. Many believe that there is a “gay gene” though this has yet to be proven. I certainly don’t believe that one can purposely convince another person to be gay, no matter how young. So no I don’t agree. If that prevents further discussion so be it. But that would be your decision not mine. I’m happy to continue. As I wrote the ADL article pretty succinctly represents my viewpoint. You’re welcome to comment on the content of its message. I don’t really care about what adjectives it uses.

I would have conditioned it more.