The Real timschochet

He took a different, dumb approach and got worse results, at least IMO. On every topic you named.

I didn’t.

Nobody assumes that. Stop the nonsense; it’s all you ever post.

He is uneducated in the current field he has chosen, which governing this country at the highest level, He has a college degree from a tremendous university but he’s shown no knowledge of American civics or history. His ignorance is stunning. Also for a man who has admittedly achieved much in business, his economic and trade ideas are simply awful. And I don’t think he understands capitalism at all. It’s the old story that if you’re good at one thing it doesn’t make you good at anything else. Trump is great at marketing, even perhaps genius at that. He also has probably the best political instincts since FDR. That I will give him.

What an idiot you are. Also- Trump has a better education than me. He went to a university that is by any reasonable standard superior to mine. The rest of what you wrote is typical of your ignorance and superficial nature.

Pelosi on MSNBC right now just killing it, explaining how Trump will be easily defeated next fall if the Dems just keep focusing on a few issues: democracy, health care, gun control, climate change, abortion. She’s so good at this, hopefully Biden takes her advice.

No he said both the primary and the general. And then he repeated the general.

Oh I agree with you.

Dude this is playtime. I “live” a few hours a day at most. Trust me, you’re more obsessed with me than I am with this board.

Just claimed that he won New Hampshire in the general election in 2016 and 2020. He didn’t either time. Something seriously wrong with this guy. It’s one thing to lie but you get the feeling he’s lying to himself.

George W Bush a great man, a heroic soldier. A good director of the CIA, an excellent ambassador to the UN (you forget to mention that), and actually a pretty good President. But as a Vice President he did nothing, like all the others. It’s a ceremonial job for the most part.

@Jon_mx certainly learned it from whatever crackpot conspiracy source he’s reading.

It’s unnecessary. If there was real, significant voter fraud I might be open to it. But without that it’s simply a restriction deliberately designed to reduce minority voting.

I doubt that. He’s certainly financially better off than me, but I suspect I’m a much happier person. I love my life and my family. I don’t have his insecurities. Trump strikes me as a very unhappy man, filled with anger and resentment, in addition he’s a really awful human being, uneducated, irrational, an abuser of women, a bigot, anti-intellectual. I wouldn’t want to be him for all the money in the world.

No. Each time he declared bankruptcy he blamed the system and claimed his finances were stronger than ever.

Ugly dress too. Not that it matters. ETA- early 70s Carol Burnett dress.

Yeah? She’s going to get crushed there. It’s one of the Trumpiest states in the Union and Dems can’t vote for her. It won’t be nearly this close.

She’s delusional.

You referenced Mein Kampf. I challenged you to find the passage in that book that backs up your claim. Fascism is a populist movement, not an elitist one.

No. Not ever. The argument that is made is that because many poor minorities, particularly in rural areas, don’t already have such IDs, requiring them will discourage voting, Not that they can’t figure out how to get them but that it’s an added step that will serve to reduce their numbers. And since there are no significant examples of voter fraud in this country involving these folks, one can only deduce that the purpose of these ID laws is to discourage and reduce those numbers.

New York Times has called it for Trump, says Trump “easily” defeats Haley. So now we know where we are.

Nobody has ever made that argument.

Theres not.

Assuming she loses tonight, even if it’s close, I don’t understand her rationale for continuing. If she can’t win in New Hampshire then where can she win?

Update- it doesn’t look good for Nikki.