easilyscan

Agree that Americans are far too willing to give up information. Unfortunately, in many cases, they have no choice. SS#s are a perfect example. The only parties that really need to know it are the individual, the SS administration, the IRS, & any institution you have financial transactions with (pension, 401(k), IRAs, mortgages, etc.) because those involve taxes. Your cable/Internet/electricity/natural gas/cell phone provider, city (water sewer garbage), even your doctor, have no legal right to require it. Problem is, they can deny providing you the service if you refuse to give it up.

13 pages because an NFL player had the audacity to speak of his beliefs at a Catholic school commencement ceremony. Sad.

Slap Maxwell was pretty good. Megan Gallagher was easy on the eyes. Rest In Peace

Done & done.

$17 + $3 It was $14 when I started with her about 5 years ago, & I've always given her a $20 & told her to keep the change. In spite of the tip % coming down as the price of the haircut went up, she always seems happy with it.

I don't follow Charlie Kirk, but this is one of the best videos on this subject. It (Charlie) cuts through the BS so well, that even the woke AA albino concedes.

Thanks It certainly does make you wonder ? Similar to the old North Dakota fighting Sioux, who have since changed their name to the North Dakota fighting hawks & also changed their logo. https://www.google.com/search?q=north+dakota+fighting+sioux+new+logo+%26+name&client=safari&sca_esv=92ceaeaabaa7c149&udm=2&biw=1680&bih=845&ei=gzJEZubZIu2kptQPq7GE6AU&ved=0ahUKEwimp6De4Y6GAxVtkokEHasYAV0Q4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=north+dakota+fighting+sioux+new+logo+%26+name&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiK25vcnRoIGRha290YSBmaWdodGluZyBzaW91eCBuZXcgbG9nbyAmIG5hbWVIyCBQvARY4x1wAXgAkAEAmAFhoAGVBKoBATe4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgCgAgCYAwCIBgGSBwCgB7sC&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

I agree that the business should be able to implement the rule if that's what they want. But we're a lawsuit happy society. Like the soy boys (before we knew them by that name) who brought this asinine case.....AND WON! https://www.iheart.com/content/2021-09-30-todays-the-anniversary-of-when-hooter-got-sued-over-not-having-waiters/

The Redskins primary logo used today was first designed in 1971 in close consultation with Native American leaders. Among those who unanimously approved & voiced praise for the logo was Walter “Blackie” Wetzel, a former President of the National Congress of American Indians & Chairman of the Blackfeet Nation. Years earlier, Mr. Wetzel had been deeply involved with U.S. President John F. Kennedy in the movement for civil liberties, civil rights, & economic freedom for all. In 2014, Mr. Wetzel’s son Don commented, “It needs to be said that an Indian from the State of Montana created the Redskins logo, & did it the right way. It represents the Red Nation, & it’s something to be proud of.”

Age discrimination lawsuit in 3-2-1

Behind you 100%

Apologies if this subject has already been covered here. https://www.mytwintiers.com/news-cat/national/ap-caitlin-clark-much-like-larry-bird-the-focus-of-talks-about-race-and-double-standards-in-sports/

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-apologizes-ipad-pro-crush-010806535.html

Almost fell out of my chair when Maher said people were washing their mail!

Fire up the printing machines.

Social Security In 1938, A Treasury Department Tax Ruling stated that SS benefits will be explicitly excluded from federal income taxation. In 1982, this happened. You will pay federal income taxes on your benefits if your combined income (50% of your benefit amount plus any other earned income) exceeds $25,000/year filing individually or $32,000/year filing jointly. You can pay the IRS directly or have taxes withheld from your payment. The developmentally disabled dip **** currently residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC voted in favor. 10 years later, in 1992, this happened. With combined income above $34,000 (single) or above $44,000 (joint filing), up to 85% of benefits can be taxed. Congress approved this in 1992 & that same POS voted in favor. The fact that they went against the earlier treasury department ruling regarding taxation, is bad enough, the fact they never raised those income levels to adjust for inflation is unforgivable. I haven't been able to find a $ figure regarding how much this costs SS recipients in the form of lower payments every year, but I'd be willing to bet it's far more than 100 million. To put that in perspective. Biden believes singles making up to 125K, & couples up to 250K, with student loan debt, deserve a huge tax break/loan forgiveness, but a retired couple with income over $44,000 should pay taxes on up to 85% of their SS benefits. The moral of the story, they're all parasites in their own way.

Cool

People sinning in Sin City. Shocking He's worth 50 million, so the fact that he was only sentenced to probation isn't.

I wonder how much the taxidermist will charge ?

I remember that. Oh my!