RepoPatrol

I just wish they would put up this information by position instead of division. Ditto on the depth charts. Much, much more cumbersome this way. I am sure that over 50% of readers couldn't tell you what division the majority of their players are in. I could but it is wasted use of brain power to research your players this way.

It is in the settings. Commish did not allow for offensive fumble TD's. You should make sure he does it next year.

I need to start 2 of these. Both Yeldon(KC) and Murray(TEN) have crappy matchups. Langford has a great matchup but is splitting with Forte. I am currently thinking about going with Murray (4 carries, 120 yds and 2 tds vs KC last year) and Langford.

If tanking your lineup affects other teams from gaining the playoffs than I would discourage such behavior. If the only affect was to change seedings i would be ok with it. That said he should still sport a lineup with playing that are active and getting touches. As for the points vs head to head. My league does the same as George. we also pay the top 10 weekly high scores which split the transaction cost pot. I personally hate head to head..it screws at least one deserving team each year. I would like to go to a points system but can't get the league to agree. You would get 10 points for a H2H win and then 1 point for each other win vs. the every team breakdown. Every team gets 2 points for completing their lineup. in our 10 team league this will mean 20 points per week are available.

I agree with the OP.Bell is crap and on short week. Abdullah is well rested and ready to rock. Detroit will put up 30+ points on Philly. Enjoy your Turkey!

Powell came back this week. Anyone paying attention should have seen this coming.

I think he will do well in Houston next year. ADP 8.6.

The GB offense needs to run through Jones. I think they finally figured it out. Too bad for all the Jones owners who gave up on him. You have to play the game within the game.

"So we’ll cross that bridge when it happens." Lovie Smith yesterday. Which means it isn't happening this week. Langford is good to go.

Guess we over reacted.

Missed field goal is karma for bears for publishing misleading info. Need 4 points to win and have Gordon on the bench.

The NFL needs to fine the Bears for publishing misleading info. These guys ony make the big money because of fantasy and they screw us every time they can.

Doesnt FF Today have a survivor game similar to this? Why yes they do.

I am in a big $ Monday -Thurs DFS contest. I did well on Monday with all the top scorers including A. Johnson who was only owned in 5% of lineups. I still have 4 spots open; RB, WR, Flex and DT. I think it is a no brainer to play the Cincy DT so that spot is locked up. For the rest i have plenty of options. i do not have enough salary available for the combo of Hill, Green, Eiifert/Bernridge. I can do Hill, Green and most any other WR. My current lineup is Bernard, Green and Barnridge. If i dump Green I can use any combo of players. Does anyone here think that Benjamin, Gabriel, Jones will outperform Green, or for that matter, Eiffert or Barnridge. Then of course there is always Bowe who likely has been playing catch with manziel while the first teamers go at it. Could he be the guy who can win it all for me? Or do I go contarian and hope Clev gets a few defensive scores forcing Cincy to pass. i could go Hill, Green, Eiffert/Barnridge if i take the Clev DT. Anyone have opinions?

I do not know why they have a hard on for Gerhart. It really makes no sense. They should be rolling with Robinson as the #2 and leave Yeldon in at goal line. Of course how 80% of the teams handle their RB's puzzles me. I think most get tired from continuously running on/off the field. Whoever tricked all these teams into committee approaches is probably laughing their ass off every Sunday.

Thinking about starting him over Gordon and Yeldon this week. PPR league. Riddick leads the NFL in receiving by backs. They play Minnesota which is ranked 28th in receiving to RB's. Bell is still limited and Abdullah hasnt been very good. I know he will be in there at the end of the game which hasn't been the case with Gordon, especially if he fumbles again. I am playing him alongside l. Murray (another 4th Q fader). i also have Missie Chrissie and Denard Robinson. A big crap fest all around at RB. Any thoughts?

A big component of our defensive scoring is points against. You start at 20 points and lose 5 points every 7 points, so after 22 points you get nothing. So I always go after teams with low projected scoring totals which means i base my DT on the opposition rather than their own stats. Works out for me about half the time BTW you did talk me out of dropping Dolphins.

I hope you do well with them but I doubt it. Plus they have a nasty schedule schedule ROS so they are a drop next week.

I plan to go with Denard Robinson if Yeldon is out again. He fared pretty well as a starter last year. Toby was clearly his backup during that time. I think he shared last week because he was coming off injury. I would look for him to get 20+ touches this week if Yeldon is out.

I own MIA, PITT and TEN. I am going with Pitt and dropping MIA as I need help at other positions. MIA has a game in a few weeks against BUF, but the rest of their schedule is pretty difficult. PIT and Ten have a good matchup most every week all the way to week 13. maybe Oakland isn't easy but on the road I doubt they will do much. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Pit Ten Pit Pit Ten Ten Ten @KC @HOU OAK CLE @JAC OAK JAC I do need to pick someone up for the fantasy playoffs. I will be dropping PIT after Week 10 so hopefully there will be something available for me.

Forsett - Bell. Let say on average this is 22 pts vs 15 points a week. So he loses 7 points a week at RB Cooper and Maclin should gain him at least 7 points a week each vs. who he had. So basically the trades nets him about 7 points per week on average and likely a bit more. Probably the same result for the other owner as well so both teams benefit. Those who have bashed this trade are obviously not the greatest thinkers in the world. You have to factor in everything!

I think you meant people who have bushes in their league.

One owner is trading Watkins and Matt Jones. In return he is getting Moncreif and Karlos Williams. The guy getting Moncreif and Williams also has Luck and McCoy. The other owner tends to dominate our league annually. An uproar has been started in our league which threatens to veto this trade. As commissioner I approve trades and then teams can challenge if they desire. i do not think this trade is clearly lopsided and will actually benefit the team that is getting Moncrief and Watkins more than the other side. Having it being challenged so passionately makes me want to step away from this league all together as I think these other owners are being completely juvenile and voting it against it more because of who the owners are than anything else. Does anyone think this trade is so clearly lopsided it should be vetoed?

Looks like Gruden is going to ruin this team. Different backs on 1st, 2nd and 3rd downs? A million different receivers rotating. He has confidence in no one so no one has confidence in themselves. Plus he is sticking with a QB that can't complete a pass more than 5 yards downfield. If it wasn't so comical it would be a travesty. Coughlan is the same mold which is why the Giants are perennial disappointments. Giants did everything they could to try to give away that game at the end. Fortunately for them, they were playing against the same kind of loser team. It is about time the major analysts in this sport start attacking this style of play. It's not good for the teams, it is not good for the players, it is not good for the fans, and certainly not good for Fantasy players which have carried the NFL the past decade.

Thanks guys. I laid down the law with my league. I will be sole decider going forward. They can replace me if they wish which would be no sweat off my back.