Hawkeye21

You are wrong again.

Does not knowing something for sure, being uncertain, mean that you don't have a backbone? That's interesting logic. That would mean it's better to just be a sheep and follow the group. That's not me.

Mexican coke

I was incorrect. It was the goofball, seafoam, who said it.

I never claimed to be agnostic either. I don't claim to be anything other than a non-practicing Catholic, because that's what I am.

You said I was atheist.

atheism, in general, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings. As such, it is usually distinguished from theism, which affirms the reality of the divine and often seeks to demonstrate its existence. Atheism is also distinguished from agnosticism, which leaves open the question whether there is a god or not, professing to find the questions unanswered or unanswerable.

I'm not "trying" to be anything. HTH

Atheist refers to someone who does not believe in the existence of a god or any gods.

You're thinking of agnostic, not atheism. They are different. Having blind faith does not give someone a backbone.

Maybe God is made up. I do not rule out the possibility of God, or Heaven and hell though. That is why I'm not an atheist. Saying that it's not factual does not make me an atheist either.

What are the atheist saying that require a response? I may not be very religious but I am definitely not an atheist. I'm a non-practicing Catholic.

Wrong again

He's a special boy.

I don't think you're using the word "fact" properly here.

Is the surprise punch and pie? Please let it be punch and pie.

I noticed no one had anything to say about Melania's speech. Managed to ignore that one. Trump had definitely seen Legally Blonde numerous times.

Everyone knows for a fact that consequences are real on earth. No one knows for a fact that heaven and hell are real. That's a pretty big difference.

Maybe he's watched the movie so much that it seeped into his subconscious.

Hey, he said it. Ask him.

Hasn't Trump and his wife been caught plagiarizing in the past as well?

I would like to see a new rule where flags get picked up if what happened did not affect the play. This would help with holding and block in the back calls a lot.

Solid logic