Byrdman5

Ameer Abdullah.

I would go with Tate. I think the same way about the Cleveland and NYJ game. I wouldn't want 2 rbs in a possible low scoring game. John brown is ok but he hasnt proved anything to me.

I would take Brees. He lost graham and gained a better Oline and spiller. They have a WR Coleman who could replace graham(he's a giant human). When is the last time Romo finished top 10 QB?

Denmard Robinson is not worth it. I do like own Daniels but you do not need 2 TES

Bills, might be the risky play but I think they keep Luck down to modest numbers.

Doesn't look like you would ever use him. I would keep sankey and Hillman over him.

I would stay put, but if you want Rodgers just drop Austin. I don't think Cunningham is worth a roster spot. STL has a rough schedule and Gurley will be back b4 u even think about starting him.

i would start Mathews, he has a good chance at having a monster game. Forsett is safe but in a 8 man league I would go for higher upside.

I think you drafted well. It looks similar to my draft with the same settings, minus yardage bonus. Good luck

Charles

Ameer and Yeldon.

I would take it. I think you get the better of the rbs and u need a WR1

I would take the Rodgers side.

John Brown, better Qb and easier opponent.

I would start royal if he plays if not Charles Johnson. Eifert might not be used much if the bengals can just run all over the raiders. I wouldn't start vareen until you see how the Giants are going to use him.

Go Donnell, I'm not sold on Austin being starter worthy yet.

Non PPR I would go with Doug.