Jump to content

Hardcore troubadour

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    105,217

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    466

Posts posted by Hardcore troubadour

  4. Posted

    17 minutes ago, Fumbleweed said:

    Do you understand what selective prosecution is? Do you realize that you and I could probably be charged with something if someone was willing to dig? Tons of people break laws they’re never prosecuted for. This was a dig up from years ago that was very much selectively prosecuted. 

    They know what it is. They know it’s possible and they know it has been done before. They just like it this time. 

  6. Posted

    13 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

    So you find all of that anti-American but not the Kangaroo Court and Trial?  GTFO, Tim.

    The NY DA met with Biden 20 times prior to the trial and had to make up felony charges in order to "get him".

    The only anti-Americans in here is everyone on your side of the aisle who thinks this was legit.  Biden went after his political opponent like a dictator does - the same "dictator" you want to accuse Trump of being.

    Truth. 💥

  14. Posted

    1 hour ago, Sean Mooney said:

    Manipulation of the law? :lol:

    This type of prosecution had never been done before? Gee maybe because no one had committed the crime to this level before.

    Kangaroo court and obviously biased judge? Both opinions that are not rooted in fact.

    Little chance of withstanding appeal? I mean, lots of things get thrown out through appeals process. Guess we have to wait and see.

    you pretty much covered it......see now you are getting it.

    your usual even keeled unbiased observation that you’re so known for. ......and you responded with your normal not rooted in fact Regurgitation of all the MAGA rebuttals of the past 15 hours. 

    I don’t claim to be even. You do, which is delusional.  And it’s not a fact that the judge has directly contributed money to left wing political organizations? Is that not a fact? Show me it isn’t. It is, and it ain’t a MAGA rebuttal.  It’s just truth.  

  22. Posted

    18 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

    Which part of this statement do you disagree with?

    "The party that says they stand for "law & order" is going to run a convicted felon at the top of their ticket in 2024"

    You left out the manipulation of the law part, and how this type of prosecution had never been done before. Could have thrown in something about kangaroo court presided over by an obviously biased judge. And that it has very little chance of withstanding appeal. Besides leaving that stuff out you pretty much covered it, with your usual even keeled unbiased observation that you’re so known for. 

×