seafoam1

Yeah, in a shltty year for defensive rookies. Got it ronery boy.

To me, I don't care WTF they say to each other on the field or in private. It's just low class thuggery if you put this shlt online for kids to see. Because they do follow these assh0les online.

Well, obama did say he thinks of dudes when he has sex. How could you not if you married one?

Oh, another one who doesn't watch football. He had a good start to the year, then teams figured him out and he was old news.

As far as "he's got a lot of growing up to do", maybe he should learn to speak English first.... Being accused of making death threats didn't sit well with Carter, whose tweets surfaced on social media through screenshots. "It's cause he already see y'all calling me a murder(er) so he just gone keep that going he know y'all goin to love it," Carter tweeted. "I can't beat that if you got the fans on your side than you're right I guess." Carter also wrote that he's trying to "be the best ever" while implying players like Feliciano are "just trying not to get traded." While Carter's tweets dispute Feliciano's allegations toward him, a prior screenshot floating around social media shows that Carter posted a picture of Feliciano with his kids on his private Instagram story. Related: Why Is Jalen Carter Making Alleged Death Threats? "I'm your biggest fan, I'll get up with ya," Carter captioned the photo with. While this confusing caption and the inclusion of the picture don't appear threatening on the surface, Carter's alleged comments made toward Feliciano about his children adds context to the post. The situation is becoming more disturbing with each new detail. Take a look: Carter slipped in the first round because of character questions. And now, despite the aforementioned brilliant football skills and increased maturity, Carter - who would be wise to take the issue of death very seriously - has made it clear he's still got a lot of growing up to do.

No good bringing the kids into the picture posting it on twitter where the kids very well could see it. That's low class ghetto shlt right there. The stitches needed will be for ga ga Carter.

Nice attempt at covering up for your failed #1 draft pick corky.

creepy joe has backed public pedoism for years. He outright practices it on camera every chance he gets.

Block that bill!! Fock Ukraine. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/things-are-going-badly-for-ukraine-really-badly/ar-BB1idS9g?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=546c088975fc422c9e29b1f43ca3dbed&ei=9 Ukraine is experiencing serious problems in fighting Russia's invasion. It's running low on troops and ammo, and top commanders are squabbling. As the second anniversary of Russia's unprovoked invasion approaches, the situation is beginning to look bleak for Ukraine. Last year's counteroffensive brought hopes that Ukraine could capitalize on its successes in 2022 and drive back Russian forces from occupied territories in southern and eastern Ukraine. But the offensive failed to achieve a breakthrough, and Ukraine is now seeing crucial support from its allies bleed away. Meanwhile, its troops are experiencing shortages of personnel and ammunition. There are problems at the top, too. Its senior command has been engulfed in chaos, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy replacing Valery Zaluzhny, a senior commander, amid reported disagreements over strategy. 'It's just relentless pressure' At the heart of Ukraine's problems is diminishing international aid. Ukraine has previously said it may not be able to successfully defend itself against Russia without US help. The Senate on Tuesday passed a $95 billion emergency defense-aid bill that could help Ukraine. But the bill must go to the House of Representatives, where Republicans are expected to seek to block it. In the meantime, Ukrainian troops are having to restrict their ammunition use, and in some parts of the front line, they're being outgunned three to one, Bloomberg reported recently. US-supplied guns such as the howitzer are falling silent near Bakhmut — a city that has been the site of months of brutal combat — because of shell shortages, CNN reported. Personnel problems are also growing. Among the core disagreements between Zelenskyy and Zaluzhny was recruitment, with the former military chief saying Ukraine needed to massively boost the number of people being drafted into the military, while the president was concerned about the impact on already fragile national morale. But the replacement of Zaluzhny "will be deeply unpopular across the Ukrainian military," Ryan Evans, the publisher of War on the Rocks, said on the site's eponymous podcast.

We know you'll be online counting the posts and reposting the times he'll be on. You've been called on it many times before. On Christmas AND Thanksgiving.

Unbreak my heart...say you'll love me again....

The ronery couple. They are ronery together.

Of being out of work. Sorry to hear.

11 am.

Too bad all this "hard work" can't get you a job.

Unemployed_Ed keeps posting this for some reason. So obsessed.

mdcack cries himself to sleep every night listening to...

But I'm not ronery.

Remember this from just a few years ago? Liberals are still falling for the titles of these bills. “Democrats are presenting this as a COVID relief bill, but in fact a lot of this bill has nothing to do with responding to the pandemic.” March 2, 2021 Washington — U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) today discussed the Democrats’ $1.9 trillion COVID spending bill, noting that only 10 percent of the legislation is directly related to public health funding to combat COVID and that a large portion of it would contribute to their liberal wish list. Thune also underscored the harm this legislation could do to America’s already bruised economy and expressed his desire to work in a bipartisan manner to pass targeted COVID-19 relief funding that actually meets the needs of the American people. Thune’s remarks below (as prepared for delivery): “Mr. President, Democrats continue to push forward with their partisan COVID legislation. “The House of Representatives passed Democrats’ $1.9 trillion partisan wish list on Saturday, and the Senate is expected to take it up later this week. “Just weeks after the president expressed his commitment to unity at his inauguration, he and his party are forcing through exclusively partisan legislation – despite Republicans’ clear willingness to negotiate. “Mr. President, when it comes to Democrats’ COVID bill, President Biden keeps asking, “What would you have me cut?” – as if there’s no way anyone could dispute the necessity of anything in this legislation. “Well, Mr. President, as I said last week, I have some suggestions. “Because this bill is rife with unnecessary and problematic provisions. “Democrats are presenting this as a COVID relief bill, but a lot of this bill has little to do with responding to the pandemic. “In fact, less than 10 percent of the bill is directly related to combating the COVID health crisis. “If President Biden would like to know what to cut, let me suggest starting with the bill’s $350 billion slush fund for states. “There’s no question that COVID has placed additional pressures on states – which is why Republicans supported targeted funding for states in previous COVID legislation. “But at this point, the vast majority of states are not in crisis. “A number of states actually saw higher tax revenues in 2020, and a majority of states, including my home state of South Dakota, have the resources they need to weather the rest of the pandemic. “Even if the federal government bailed out those states that are still struggling – some at least partially because of their own mismanagement – $350 billion far, far exceeds the amount that would be needed. “Democrats are simply providing a large and unnecessary giveaway to states – with the distribution formula heavily weighted in favor of blue states. “Then there’s the bill’s funding for schools. “Now, Republicans are committed to getting schools reopened so our kids can get back to the in-person learning they need. “It’s why we voted for $68 billion in COVID funding for K-12 schools last year. “But right now, Mr. President, schools don’t need additional funding. “So far, K-12 schools have spent just $5 billion of the $68 billion we provided them. “Yet Democrats’ bill would provide nearly $129 billion in additional funding. “And despite all that additional – and unnecessary – money, nothing in the bill would require schools to actually reopen. “Schools could collect this money while still depriving students of the benefits of in-person learning. “And another thing, Mr. President. “Democrats are billing this legislation as a COVID relief bill and suggesting that it’s providing urgently needed funding. “Yet 95 percent of the bill’s money for schools – 95 percent – would be spent AFTER this year. “That’s right. “Just 5 percent of this quote-unquote “emergency funding” would be spent in 2021. “The rest would be spent between 2022 and 2028. “Are we really supposed to believe that money that would be spent in 2028 – years after the pandemic is likely to be over – is urgently needed COVID relief funding? “Mr. President, I could go on for a while here with suggestions for what to cut in this bill. “I’m pretty sure that $100 million for a Silicon Valley underground rail project does not have a lot to do with getting our country out of the COVID crisis. “Or $1.5 million for a bridge in the Democrat leader’s home state. “Then there’s the $86 billion bailout for multiemployer pension plans. “Billions for environmental policies. “And a provision to ensure that Planned Parenthood and labor unions can apply for Paycheck Protection Program loans designed to help small businesses. “I’m not sure how far that will go toward helping our economy – but it will certainly help fill the coffers of some of Democrats’ political allies. “Mr. President, if Democrats were really just focused on COVID relief, this would be a much smaller bill. “But Democrats’ ambitions were much larger than just addressing the COVID crisis. “A Democrat political operative famously said, “Never allow a good crisis go to waste.” “Democrats have taken that advice, and are using the COVID crisis as cover for a whole list of partisan priorities – with potentially very negative consequences. “Democrats’ COVID bill runs a very real risk of overstimulating the economy, which could, among other things, drive up prices on the goods Americans use every day. “Even some liberal economists have sounded the alarm over the size of Democrats’ coronavirus legislation. “Then, of course, there’s the danger posed by driving up our debt. “We had to borrow a lot of money last year to meet the demands of the coronavirus crisis. “And while it was money we needed to borrow, we need to be very aware of the fact that we added a substantial amount to our already very large national debt. “We need to be very careful about any additional borrowing and ensure that we’re only borrowing what’s absolutely necessary. “And that does not include money for a bridge in New York, or a taxpayer bailout for mismanaged states. “Mr. President, it’s deeply disappointing that Democrats chose to turn their backs on bipartisanship. “Republicans were ready to work with Democrats on additional targeted relief. “Instead, Democrats chose to pursue a partisan process that would allow them to stuff the bill with unnecessary spending and political payoffs.

Who the fock wants to send money to Ukraine when we have our own problems? Oh yeah, the dumbass liberals.

Look who's back for another beating. This dude is one low class mental midget.

We have to see who the shooters voted for. Because if they didn't vote for Biden, then they ain't black. And if that is the case, then they are white supremacists.

Biden isn't the problem, it's the people who are stupid enough to vote him into office that are the problem. mdcack and the rest of the liberal dumbasses out there can't get enough of voting in stupid politicians. It's in their DNA. Liberal stupidity.