EternalShinyAndChrome

"as the family takes time to heal..." . Huh? Heal from what?

Now do George Soros and all the billionaires that showed up at the DNC convention. Or are you okay with billionaires as long as they vote like you? Just want to know what to tell the proletariat about your position.

Uhm, yeah. Barring men from women's bathrooms and spaces is LITERALLY protecting women from men. Also, you added something she never said, so your strawmen won't work here. How about condemning the assault instead of rushing to attack Nancy Mace with strawmen? Are you supporting tranny violence? It sure seems like it.

I'm just trying to keep it realz for you. You can't side with a rapist and then expect people to forget or tell them to STFU because you don't want to hear the cold, hard reality of your position. Help me, help you.

You sided with the rapist and then was critical of the victim's father on top of that. Basically saying that the girl deserved it. Disgusting. You should be ashamed of yourself.

7th alias? More like 700th.

Stop trying to distract and own up to what you said. We can start there.

Yeah, I know. Those who side with rapists are not only sad, but disgusting as well. Shame on you.

Again, you need to STFU until you own what you said and apologize for siding with a rapist. I mean, seriously, did you actually think that was a good idea? That was the "winning" side? Disgusting. So STFU until you're ready to be honest. You're not going to be able to run from this.

Sorry, pal. You said it - we all saw it - and until you OWN it and apologize, you can STFU. I would advise you that NOT taking the rapist' side is the side you want to be on. Just my suggestion, but your call.

You clearly said it and implied it. I saw your post and you clearly sided with the rapist and then attacked the victim's father as well. That's not debatable or irrefutable.

Your parents weren't upset that the boy they raised as a proud liberal is using gay slurs?

Yep. Get rid of them all. Competency and merit should rule over all

That's what Kamala and her husband did

100 people were threatened, but only one person didnt feel threatened so that means nothing should have been done.

It does? Because this thread was literally started by worms.

You're not #1 on the Leaderboard for a reason, but you are #1 on the Weenie Board - for a reason.

Where's Luigi?

For sure. There would be no police force able to stop me if that was the case.

They're just upset Trump didn't grab their pvssies.

not sure, TBH. Whatever someone "with standing" looks like in this case.

Well, if they allow it for Christianity, then they have to allow ALL religions which is why it's stupid to allow ANY religion on gubmint property.

Thanks! Verified.

The parents who sued couldn't show how they would be affected by the new policy. That's all. So the Justices ruled on that, not the merits of the case.

They simply ruled that the parents did not have standing, not on the actual merits of the lawsuit. Once someone with standing sues, then it becomes a problem for the left.