EternalShinyAndChrome

If you DID comprehend the argument you wouldn't have couched it as a single transgender person which, of course, you did. So you either didn't comprehend it or you purposefully lied for to mislead and acted like a drama queen. So the two choices are you're as dumb as a box of rocks or you're a liar. No middle ground here. Which one do you prefer?

What people? You soy boys who prefer trannies? Sorry, pal, you lose again. Your degenerate views don't represent normal people.

Well, tim, Squiz and the like are anti-REAL women with their views. You can't support trans and ACTUAL women at the same time. I guess they just prefer trannies.

$25 plus tip.

What they call an "Ivy League" school.

The Satanic Panic was late 70's/early 80's you dumb f@ck. Ask me how I know.

That's squidtard's MO. First Deny. When that fails, then claim "it's only a small amount". When that fails, then claim "it's not a big deal". When that fails, then proclaim that The parties switched sides and they were Republicans when it happened.

You ever notice that whenever the Democrats are on the wrong side of history they exclaim that "THE PARTIES SWITCHED! WE WERE REPUBLICANS BACK THEN!"? Every. Single. Time. Slavery, Jim Crowe, KKK, Civil Rights. Every point in time those came about they claimed the above.

Wait, you thought that a person said a single transgender person is an existentail threat? Lie much? No one said that. You f'n soy boys are such the drama queens! Looney Mooney is apt.

20 years ago? GTFO, Tim. That was late 70's/early 80's nonsense. You're such a f'n liar.

YOUR side is the one that pushed it on everyone! Are you a f'n moron? You did EXACTLY as I said you would do: Predicting your DNC approved propaganda responses is so easy, even a caveman could do it.

it's clear your grasp on words and their definitions is tenuous at best and outright gaslighting at worst. Quit trying to redefine terms to something that fits the propaganda you slurp on the daily.

For you? Or the ACTUAL and REAL women who work there?

Correct. Gaslighting at its finest. The left makes a big deal out of it and when people finally push back it's always, "Why you making such a big deal out of this?" and get called names.

This guy:

What a nightmare. The women's locker room was a no go, right?

Who knew the WNBA would actually allow non-gay women in? Progress and diversity, indeed.

My problem is they are still males and still are stronger than women. In fact, I would go a step further and say trannies must declare themselves right away. I'd be okay with "Other" bathrooms/locker rooms for them. They are not and never will be women. They are caricatures of women.

Disagree. Biological males only in boys locker rooms, never in biological female rooms.

Liberals: OMG! Did you hear what that one guy who has no power and is not running anything said about <insert liberal group of the week here>? OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! Also Liberals: I voted for Joe Biden!

Schiff is a disgusting sack of sh#t. Fun Fact: He's lied more times than Trump.

You son of a....

Weepaws has unified and united the sides!!!!! USA! USA! USA!

The biggest cost to marriage is the woman. And that's a cost that doesn't end on the wedding day. I kid, I kid.

And I think that's fine that you have that view, but they're choosing careers in their early 20's - nothing wrong with that - but regretting it by the time they're hitting their 30's so I think your logic only works if you're talking about women in their early to mid 20's. Of course, there are exceptions to EVERY rule, but I believe the vast majority of women prefer the traditional role but are being told or "guilted" into pursuing a career. Again, like I said above, it's an illusion of "choice" because the second they choose the traditional role they are mocked and shamed by the feminists and weak soy boys (not you).