EternalShinyAndChrome

Fnord's Dragon coming soon to a theatre near you! Fnord's Dragon 2: This Time it's Personal already in development!

Very true!

I think you're definitely reaching here. He gets hate from the right because he's a straight up Communist.

His desperation for a "gotcha" moment is so overwhelming he's forced to move those posts and create strawmen. It's absurd. I don't remember him being this bad previously, but the last few weeks I've noticed a massive change in his posts.

This is funny, because Ghey_Artest and Sandy Chum's teeth are constantly getting kicked out too (in this forum)!

What do you think people who are here illegally do when they are put back on the street to await trial? Go ahead, take a guess.

I never said that. I don't care about the other charges because all we need is the one: being here illegally. You really need to stop trying to get a "gotcha" or "W" moment and start thinking and conversing like an adult w/out altering people's positions to fit your need.

Hang on there. All liberals in NYC need to be forced to stay there and suffer under the chaos and destruction their vote caused. I don't want them going anywhere else and ruining those places too. I'm talking ALL liberals, too, not just the ones that voted for him. Their previous votes enabled this guy to get where he is in the first place.

Okay, thanks. Then that means he's still a criminal as he's here illegally, which in and of itself is enough to get him deported. All these other supposed charges are just extra.

I grew up in a religious household and while I believe religion can be a good thing - and I hold no ill will towards those who practice religion - religious people will believe what they want to believe. I never understood why God/Jesus/Whoever spoke in riddles and "appeared" in things rather than just showing up and saying, "Hey, right here! Stop doing that sh#t". Right? Seems like that would be the best way to clarify things other than these types of "appearances" where it just confuses people even more. Or maybe this is just a cloud.

Just to clarify, when you say "criminal charges" do you mean other charges other than being here illegally?

Makes sense. I mean, they LITERALLY have no idea what a woman is so it probably goes w/out saying that they have no idea what a man is either.

You know who else reads Iran State media? Ghey_Artest. That's where he gets all his information to "debunk" Trump. No lie.

Sorry. the news only covers white on black crime. Nothing else is important.

never listened to her. I she really an "icon"? I feel like that word is way overused to the point it means nothing anymore.

Squiztard looked out his front window and didn't see anything. You guys sure there were riots at all? Squiztard says it didn't happen because there was no activity in front of his house. I think I have to go with Squizzy on this one. The "Front Window" scientific method is undefeated in liberal land.

Ghe_Artest heard DIRECTLY from a CNN "anonymous source" and the Ayatollah himself that said the mission didn't do anything. Are you questioning CNN and the Ayatollah?

Hey the Ayatollah told him that Trump gave him permission so it must be true. You need to learn to trust the ayatollahs more.

Slow down there. Ghey_Artest gets his news DIRECTLY from the Ayatollah and Hamas. That means it's true!!

How much further left can you go than a Communist?

I appreciate that, Tim. I have a daughter as well and wouldn't want that to happen to her either. It certainly is awful but, like I said, when I hear "he groomed me" that sounds like someone who doesn't want to examine their own choices and culpability. Too many women, IMO, have weaponized it to gain victim status, cash or attention. I understand there are lot of legitimate cases out there, but every time a woman falsely accuses a man because she doesn't want to face choices she made, it ruins it for the legitimate cases. I have a son too, and wouldn't want him to be on the end of something like that too. I can tell you with 100% confirmation that my wife knows someone who accused a man because she regretted sleeping with him. And the funny thing is, these women are never held accountable. But we always go after the man. I'm just saying there has got to be a better way of examining the situation than the one where we can't EVER question one side of the equation. Thoughts?

Good point and duly noted. I guess if I came off like a I apologize. That was not my intent but I can see how that looks now after re-reading some of my posts and thinking for a bit. I should have crafted my words better and more measured. @Engorgeous George actually encapsulated my thoughts in a much better way. I read the "he groomed me" comment in the article and that's what I went off on. I actually stopped reading after that and went, "Oh, hear we go again". When I hear that I immediately think "I partied hard last night and now regret it" because we've seen many men get falsely accused before. He very well may have committed a bunch of SA, but the fact that we can NEVER question the woman otherwise we get "you support r@pe" immediately shuts down the conversation. No one can ever ask how we got to this point because we have to 110% believe the woman OR ELSE. Thanks for responding to my post the way you did. It made me think.

Yeah, no one's disagreeing with you here but maybe address the point ("he groomed me") instead of going off on a man-hating diatribe. The reason we can't have discussions is because no one can EVER question the woman's motives or story. So when someone like me comes along and questions it, you lose your sh#t and then just jump to "You support r@pe!". THAT is what shuts down conversation, not the questioning. Let's try to have a level discussion, if you can.

Also, did it ever occur to you that maybe the reason why - nowadays - women don't come forward about sexual assault (your claim) is because enough WOMEN have made enough false allegations that they've ruined it for the actual SA and r@pe victims?

He most certainly is.