EternalShinyAndChrome

I don't think anyone thought prices would drop immediately. In any event, that's going to require a plan and maybe getting other countries to stop f@cking us is one step in that plan. I'm willing to wait it out.

Actually, he did increase cancer rates according to his January 2025 article from cancer.org. Thanks, Biden!! Again, short term pain for long term gain. No risk, no reward. You know all the sayings. So maybe 2 months is a bit soon to start complaining.

So then it depends on what your definition of "very fast" means in regards to prices. I think most people would argue that 2 months in for "very fast" in regards to prices is probably still a bit too soon. Maybe 6 months? Not sure, but I'm willing to give it more time. Biden DID say he would cure cancer if you voted for him, but AFAIK he didn't. So, if Biden couldn't cure cancer in 4 years can we give Trump at least that long? Maybe more than 2 months, at least?

Well, there's a reason he's not reading it. The propaganda and lies he consumes are just so much tastier and sweeter. Why would he EVER want the truth?

I like you Honcho, but you can't possibly think I would watch the Daily Show, do you? They're so far left Michael Moore calls them "the crazy left".

Fair enough.

This is the problem: WTF are they fighting about? From what I understand, Europe and a lot of other countries have levied far greater tarifs against us PRIOR to all this and we've been taking it in the @ss. Maybe I'm wrong, but isn't Trump just trying to balance things out?

Tarifs imply costs going up short term. Did he have to explicitly say "costs might go up"? Also, eggs are down in price.

no riots. Liberals only care about criminals, illegal immigrants or other non-citizens. Law-abiding US Citizens they could care less about.

WTF you talking about, retard? We all knew exactly what he was going to do and yes, short term pain for long term gain, moron. If you want to shack up with trannies in your spare time, that's fine. No one has a problem with that. It's when you force the trannies on every one else is where normal and logical people push back. GTFO.

OP Summary: "My far-left liberal sources have told me Trump lies."

Yep. Basically, Shilo didn't show up for the court case so the court decreed a default judgment in favor of the security guard. From what I've read, Sanders is one of those d0ucheb@gs who thinks he doesn't have to answer to anyone because daddy is Deon Sanders. Now he's trying to get out of everything he owes BEFORE he signs any contract with the NFL so no one can garnish his wages or get a piece of that. D0ucheb@g move.

Huh? what do you mean? Link?

"Wahhh!!!!! I didn't get what I wanted, so I'm going to sue!!! I'll just make some sh#t up as the reason!" I mean, they LITERALLY used the democratic process to pick the name.

Not only will they deny it, they'll claim that America has a far-right problem!

Disney may be 700 million in the hole before Lilo and Stich premiers. Wow. Don't worry, they're fine we were told!!!!

Violence is a feature of the Democrat Party and liberals in general, it's not an exception. The US has a problem with leftist and far-leftist violence. It's just about an epidemic now. Hopefully the FBI gets it's act together and go after these extreme groups and people with a vengenance.

Why is that a problem? Wut? Really? You serious, Parker? Because you're NOT supposed to be assisting the runner forward. For example, the Offensive line can't pick up the RB and start running with him. Or pick him up and throw him over the TD line. I mean, c'mon. It's painfully obvious WHY you shouldn't be assisting the runner by pushing, shoving, pulling or throwing. Are you really going to play obtuse here? Otherwise, you allow it but you allow the DEF to do the same. But that's not football. That's rugby. And it's also a dumb and unexciting play. It's clear that the Eagles are trying to game the system and that's not in the spirit of the game either. Even Sean McVay says "That doesn't look like football to me".

You ban it because you have other players asssisting and helping the runner move forward with the ball. Otherwise you allow it but you allow the defense to do the same thing for defensive plays.

This is clearly a violation of the First Amendment and will be dealt with as such by SCOTUS if it ever gets codified into Colorado law. This is no different than calling someone a "racist" or "nazi" or "homophobe". Are we going to codify those as well? And all other terms anyone feels is derogatory to them? No way this stands.

Susan Crawford won by about 237K votes. I don't see any evidence of election hijinks, but I wouldn't be surprised. Democrats have been stuffing ballot boxes and cheating for decades.

Slippery slopes are VERY real. This seems like a no-brainer SCOTUS reversal if they ever make this law in Colorado. However, they only voted it out of committee. From what i understand it still has to pass in the CO legislature.

Just to clarify, if a team tries it once, maybe twice, that - to me - is not the same thing as making it a regular play in the playbook like the Eagles have. I guess I should have clarified that.

But again, you're missing the point. It doesn't matter if other teams have tried it once. That doesn't mean everyone is doing it all the time like the eagles are. If we're going to allow offensive players to push or pull a player into the end zone then we should allow the defense to do the same for defensive purposes.

Yeah, most teams don't do it. But that's beside the point