Sean Mooney

I said the only answer that wouldn't have gotten push back was "no" but medically speaking she can't say no because she knows the specific circumstances that Honcho mentioned so she would be undermining her medical knowledge to just say what some representative wants her to say so he can have political gain or "own libs" And to be fair- if she just says "no" outright she is going to get pushback from idiots on the left that want the answer to always be "yes" without the nuance of the scenario outlined... Which gets us back to the original point of- it's a dumb question to ask in that moment Did you eat your sandwich already this morning?

What is wrong about it? Actually try to have a discussion here for once.

And the fact that they go down different paths shows how idiotic they are. Can we at least admit the question has nothing to do with what the hearing is about?

Why does she have to say "irrelevant"? The person asking the question knows it is irrelevant. There is no need to even ask it other than to get the reaction it did here and get a bunch of people on X saying "Look at how this doctor is owned...." And she still would've gotten push back on it. It's a dumb question that there is no answer that would've been accepted by the MAGA mob other than "No" which she knows is not entirely accurate from a specific biological standpoint

I mean I know that stuff like that exists, and you know it exists....but she should also be smart enough to know the country doesn't do nuance very well at this point when people (like the usual smattering of idiots in here commenting) have been conditioned into thinking everything is clearly defined black or white and there is no room for anything off that.

Again though- how does that question have anything to do with the topic of the hearing at hand? That's what makes it political in nature.

From the exchange she- correctly- identified this as a person trying to make political gain. But still- just say "No," mock Hawley and then move on.

This was during a hearing on the safety of the abortion pill. And this was a legitimate question asked. I mean the answer is obviously "no" and she should've said that...but more precisely she should've just called him a clown and moved on.

How would that even work? Trump "cancels" mid term elections but the states can still run them no? Also, if you "cancel elections" and it can just be unilaterally done- you'd be leaving cities and towns and states in weird holding patterns or without people to govern. It's insane and it's nothing to get upset over.

I said from the start- all reports and the initial video have her getting told by one office to "get out of here" and by the other to "get out of her car." Again- she handled things badly. The ICE agents did as well. It ended in her death.

Idiot MAGA says "what". Cool story bro.

https://archive.ph/IFIWr

It's a good thing that signature on the bag looks nothing like the one on the handwritten letter.

Watch out- the gaggle of idiots will activate their Wonder Twin powers to come after you next....

As I said- cars were going around her yet. If she was trying to impede traffic she was doing a shitty about it. The car in front of her was doing a slightly better job. Still waiting for your stuff. I know you just have movie clips. At least you picked a funny movie. As to the rest of your post- off is the direction you can fook

I already posted about this last week (and the thread seems to have been nuked). I gave her blame for things. I'm okay with her protesting ICE's actions. I think she should've chose different methods to do it.

Nobody could get around her? I mean look- if we are just going to ignore the video at this point...fine. Who car is the one in front of her's? Is it the girlfriend's? Cause she's blocking traffic more than Good was. I'm glad you posted sites that clearly point out things I've either outright said or alluded to in this discussion. You guys are hilarious at this point. Please keep arguing with yourselves. The short answer is- from all the videos it does not feel like at any point they had belief or proof she was violating immigration law or general concern's about their own safety. Again- I've only ever said the law is murkier about forcibly removing you from a vehicle.

The law on this is murkier than you and the others seem to want it to be. Case in point- what threat did she pose? What was she stopped for? (keep in mind the car was stopped)....like there is a lot of stuff here. Otherwise- while I appreciate your concern....I generally don't actively try to run afoul of the cops in any way. And if I ever decide to it sure as hell won't be for the reason Good was trying to. So I'll be good

You know you've done well when the gaggle of idiots activate their Wonder Twins power and yell "Form of, a dumpster fire" to try and come at ya.

You are essentially if Forrest Gump was a try hard and super unlikable.

So nothing? Good to know. It's amazing how the minute you are asked for evidence to support counter claims in any discussion you scurry away

More or less embarrassing than fake quitting a message board and having to come back when no one gives a sh!t about you leaving? And to be clear before you whine- this wasn't me "following you around"....you threw the first shot

So you have nothing is what you are saying? Got it No...it's a word in every dictionary. It's marked as non-standard because the argument is it implies a double negative. I just think it sounds funny versus regardless.

They don't have the right to answer her car door. That's the singular answer for the reasons I suggested. You have yet now on time 3 to provide anything counter to that. You are an unserious poster incapable of having an intelligent discussion. I will keep that in mind for future reference.

Yeah you left out the quote where I said the charges wouldn't have held up under any kind of defense. But it's what you do. Again- show your proof of individual things where I am wrong and we can discuss.