Sean Mooney

I really think there was some debate about potentially burning Shapiro and potentially giving up that office in PA.

Lot of people willing to slurp what Trump feeds them

Eh- there has been discussion for a long time that Trump has some of his own cognitive issues- it just looks vastly different than it does with Biden right now

What a piece of garbage the cop is there.

Both sides have reasons to portray themselves as being on the higher road on the debate stuff and it clearly works as the camps here buy fully the explanations of the candidates they favor. My only thing on the debates is this- leave the audiences out of it. I want to hear the two candidates actually going back and forth without it sounding like a 90's TGIF sitcom.

Be careful- HT doesn't like when people ask if others are autistic.

Yeah that video was like immediately debunked. But basement winner Horseman was fooled because he couldn't move his fat fingers to click to an actual site.

Yes- you do lie

Damn Algeria and their woke culture allowing people to transition... Look- nobody wants a biological male punching a woman in the face. This doesn't seem to be that though and maybe this was not the place to plant the flag of "WOKE!"

And you responded back to all of them in a conversation? That's the part you tend to leave out.

Soon you'll be lying again like you did with the back and forth DM exchange. Look forward to that.

Is this your new line of attack now? But no- social interactions and bathing are kind of things you learn early on from your parents..But to tie this back to ancestry you are a pile of sh!t- so at least one of your parents were. Or at least partially HTH.

The amount of people here who don't understand how genealogy and ancestral trees work is stunning. Well it would be stunning if they didn't constantly show how ill equipped they are to understand basic concepts- like reading, and bathing, and social interactions

If Kamala wins (and I'd still bet against it) watching the MAGA chuds here try to figure out in their brains how Trump lost to a minority woman candidate will be essentially this moment from The Simpsons:

I mean the polls do mean nothing at this point yet.

Trump did call into Newsmax a little later to say that "the woman from FOX News got a little uppity at one point."

The session today the Trump team said the audio was messed up which delayed it by 35 minutes. The conflicting reports from the organization are that the Trump team was objecting to the live fact checkers who were going to be there as they didn't want fact checks in real time. My guess is people will believe whatever best fits their narrative so either Trump is yet again aggrieved by the "nasty" media or he wanted to be able to lie without being called on it.

Maybe you just didn't turn the volume up loud enough.

They don't want the reality of the situation.

There are two components to VP selection for me- the first is the aspect of what do they give you ticket wise? Do they give you something that helps smooth over some perceived weakness you might have to the general electorate (think Cheney to Bush or Biden to Obama or Pence to Trump really)? Do they help give you a push in a state that might be needed to win (If I'm right that Shapiro will be Kamala's VP this kind of fits that)? The second aspect is do they have anything in their background that shows that they could potentially be a leader and form necessary coalitions and help build connections that you will need in order to be President. Obviously both of those things are hugely subjective. Now the other thing for me would be- if we want to make a case that there are no real qualifications for VP then that seems to indicate- who the hell cares if Kamala was a "DEI hire"? If there is no qualification necessary- then pick whoever the hell you want as long as you don't pick someone like James Stockdale. And TBF- I'm not arguing against the idea of "qualified"/"eligible" that you are drawing between. I get what you are saying.

The worst thing Biden did to Harris was make the comment about what his VP pick would be. Because on paper you could look at her rise through the political ranks and the various positions she held and say "Yeah okay...she's qualified." But because Biden said what he did it puts her under a microscope that is honestly unfair to what she accomplished in her life to this point. I mean- no one seems to be railing about the lack of qualifications that Vance has for the VP spot and it's clear that Harris has a better political resume than Vance.

It won't because: 1.) The people Trump is trying to drive to the voting booth are exactly the type of people who will love what he is saying here. 2.) You can already see people here doing the work of trying to gaslight it all to people. 3.) Too many people in this country anymore just vote for the letter behind the name and not the actual content of what the person is and does. Happens both ways

Be careful saying stuff like this. You start measuring yourself against others here and calling yourself a "life winner" in the same way that doofus Horseman did and next thing you'll be on your 5th username here still typing nonsense because your life is considerably emptier than you pretend it is.

Realtim definitely has that idea that everything is a needle mover and it just isn't. On the flip side you have guys like Overkill, peefoam, HT, and the like who just vomit back up everything on Twitter as if it is all true and all meaningful.

He's a bigot and a racist and a sexist