Sean Mooney

Sure ignore what I said and what I responded to specifically.

Then you keep saying "the left did this..." "your masters" You are saying one thing and then applying something else...at least you finally changed the topic line

Your whole position here is right wing. Not my fault you don't see it.

Do you admit that both sides are guilty of over the top rhetoric? I don't have masters. I don't set my moral code by what a bunch of dipshit political jackwagons say. Right is right and wrong is wrong. You keep saying "One side, one side." That isn't being an adult- that's being a kid trying to pass the buck. I'm not misrepresenting you. I'm reading what you are saying and calling you on it.

I am not diluting one side. I'm saying both sides have done this and both should account for it. You still want to point to one side and say "It's them, not us." But again- maybe after 3 or 4 years you will change your mind and try to high ground someone else.

Give him 3 years to think about.

Now here comes the tactic of adding things to the discussion that were not a part of it. I recommend you reconsider the path you are taking and/or maybe take a step back and really think about what you are saying

Because there is a chance the shooter was Republican. Why would they want to address that when they can use it to mobilize their side. It works because people like RLLD buy it hook, line, and sinker despite believing they are of superior intelligence.

You still seem to think it is only one side involved in this....what needs to happen in 3 or 4 years to make you change that position? See- you are missing the point which is just sheer ignorance and/or arrogance on your part (typical really)...an adult could have looked at January 6th in that moment and said "C'mon man- you can't say that stuff. That leads to why this happened." They don't say "Liberals are making this up." (flash forward to something 4 years later) "Oh man...now something happened to the person I support wholeheartedly so hey words are bad and got us here. Stupid liberals." If something is bad, it's bad. Maybe when you are more "gown up" you'll understand that.

You'd have to wait 4 years to know for sure though right?

Keep adding words to what I said. If you need to do that to enhance your position you're in the weeds already. Trumps rhetoric on January 6th was bad and helped lead to what happened. The rhetoric on Trump was bad and helped lead to what happened. Both democrats and republicans have operated in extremes in politics for as long as I've been alive and social media has ratcheted up that rhetoric because people post things out of context which further ignites flames. I'd venture the 20 year old republican was so far gone because all he has really known is that rhetoric. Also- an adult would see how both sides are involved in this and not point fingers one way. Maybe you are "gown up" enough.

Give him 3 or 4 years for something else to happen. Then he might reconsider his thoughts. That's what adults do- you liberals don't understand. That is the gist of what he'll say- just add like 200% more pretentiousness.

No an adult has a sense of right and wrong in every moment and doesn't necessarily need something to happen 3 and a half years later to make them say "Hey maybe that bad thing was actually bad." I understand this is something you don't understand. So then the people on here posting the picture of Trump with a target on his head are just overreacting...because maybe it is sort of funny.

Progress then on the first one. I mean- Trump liking that post had potential to lead to something every bad. It didn't, but that doesn't make it okay. Especially in a world where we had people planning something very similar against the governor of Michigan (something too that many people on the right here laughed about)

What did you say in response to those who claimed Trump's words on January 6th helped lead to the insurrection? What was your comment when Trump liked and promoted a Tweet with someone having a tailgate depicting Biden being hogtied and gagged?

Real centrist thoughts here

If you break into someone's house and attack them with a hammer there is a pretty solid chance you are trying to kill them. Maybe not in the most effective manner but still.... C'mon- be the centrist here you claim to be.

That doesn't fit the Trump worship though

I mean at one point Elizabeth Warren was the VP front runner. Kamala is way better than Warren

Take out who? DTJ- no The Reporter- no Libs of TikTok creator- no

It doesn't. Rubio may have. Burgum maybe would've helped with centrists but he didn't really give Trump a state that was in doubt either.

Imagine stumping for a smug jagoff who was born on third base and doesn't have an ounce of the charisma his father has. DTJ will be on the ash heap of history once Donald Sr.'s political career is over. And "He committed a murder on Live TV"- who talks like that?

Rubio would've been more useful as a vote gathering strategy

He has an "R" behind his name. That's how Strike thinks. It's how some feel about people with a "D" behind their name

The post from Crabtree literally says "agency protocol" Some idiots think that feeds a conspiracy theory.