Sean Mooney

Like I said in my original post (and I'm seeing a lot of people agree with) it's the level of disrespect that is shocking. Again- I think there are a lot of factors going into that (and really there are a lot of factors going into the disrespect being shown to cops as well) but like at 13 I wasn't that openly disrespectful to a teacher even if I disliked them. I certainly wouldn't blow off something done like this and like most said here- my mom and dad would've whupped my azz had I been busted for something like this.

I'm not disagreeing with you. Like I said- I have nothing to hide and thus don't care. I do think a lot of parents would care because the kids are minors in most cases. I'll say this- don't underestimate the ability of a parent to get outraged over innocuous things anymore.

The courts have seen it otherwise. They basically say as long as it doesn't disrupt school it's okay. It does feel like this is disrupting the school however.

That's fine if someone wants their kid to go to a private or religious school. I shouldn't have to help pay for it.

I did not.

Republican vs Democrat has nothing to do with this dumbass.

I don't mind cameras in the classroom (I've got nothing to hide about what I do) but I think you will run into issues with some teachers not wanting them feeling that they are being watched by Big Brother and some parents not wanting them as they will feel it is violating their child's privacy. I'm more taken aback by just the blatant lack of respect for the teachers in this instance as it relates to this story

He also implied people should vote their feels and not reality.....in this one instance.

I think multiple aliases are silly. I never said otherwise. So fook off Paul Blart It looks to eliminate Title 1 funds. That is money school districts get to support low income students and support students who need extra help for subjects. So say a school has underperforming students in reading. They could apply for and be granted Title 1 funds that are mandated to be spent on a reading support coordinator (or some other such position). Those funds are monitored and if they are not used for targeted purposes the schools can get in trouble. And I would wager any district with lower income students has underperforming schools and numbers and use that money to help bring scores up. Additionally, schools can use that money to bring in an additional teacher to create smaller classrooms to give more direct help. Without it you'd have some class sizes jump to like 35-40 kids. That means fewer books (or spending local tax dollars to buy more books) and would cut back on paraprofessionals for help in classrooms. It would also eliminate grants that help children in low income homes by helping eliminate- after school programs, summer food programs, college prep programs, and would offer massive cuts to breakfast and lunch programs which for some kids in lower income areas are the only meals they get in a day. It wants to do away with federal college loans meaning all students would be dropped into private loans which are notoriously predatory. They want to form educational savings accounts for all parents as opposed to giving money to the schools. This would effectively raise local school taxes more because instead of a given money pool for the local district it would mean students could go anywhere regardless of price. I know school choice is something people all want but the reality of that is it means wealthy families get money to send their kids to high cost private schools or religious based schooling. The people who wrote Project 2025 too are the people funding Moms for Liberty behind the scenes and many other groups trying to infiltrate local school boards. The question becomes this- should public school tax dollars be used to prop up religious and private schools for families?

Also ironic he is the one who sits here calling himself a "life winner" yet he has to keep making new names to post here. He also- as gutterboy said- is the one who posted gay porn links here. He also is the one who talked about whoring his wife out to others while he watches He is also the one who said in a discussion that if someone knocks on your door you have to answer because you have no other choice. He is an idiot

"white" and "poor" are not opposite terms.

Whoever is in charge of Project 2025 and wrote it- in a thinktank of people or solo- really hates poor people. Especially poor people with kids.

Raiders knows that- he's too much of a poosay to just admit that he is in the tank for the MAGA unit

Neither of them are taught in schools. The most centrist poster here would know that I'd think.

Project 2025 to the left is what CRT is to the right. A boogeyman that isn't there but we can rile people up over it.

We wish we could make his mom swallow him

Not a new excuse. I said this to you over a week ago and you decided to go down this path. I'd say look in the mirror. Also- don't say nonsense about not ascribing intent when you do so readily

June 28th I said: "I appreciate that the YouTube hyperbole line (which was really about interactions YOU AND I have had) is the line that has broken you." I also said: "Dude the last few back and forths we have had have led to you relying on anecdotal YouTube videos- including one with a skeleton sitting behind him in a basement. " which was very clearly me pointing to a few instances. So again- you are mentally soft and weak.

Prove it Mentally soft. You missed a joke based in hyperbole. And you've posted referencing it now for two weeks while also posting other gibberish about how you don't assign intent when it is clear you did here. You've been exposed.

A majority of those comments were at night...and you kept responding despite what you want to try and present to people here.

You want to go back to the PM conversation we had before? Maybe this time you will tell me where you are on the autism spectrum

Your head is empty. Stay out of this Paul Blart. Go write the next of your one thousand posts a month you no life having sh!t sipper

" I am reticent to ascribe intent to people.... particularly negative intent." Seems like you were pretty quick to ascribe negative intent here.... It's also not my fault you don't know what "hyperbole" or "joke" means but now give us another 5 or 6 lines showing your softness.

" I am reticent to ascribe intent to people.... particularly negative intent." Seems like you were pretty quick to ascribe negative intent here.... It's also not my fault you don't know what "hyperbole" or "joke" means but now give us another 5 or 6 lines showing your softness.

" I am reticent to ascribe intent to people.... particularly negative intent." Seems like you were pretty quick to ascribe negative intent here....