Sean Mooney

Where did I say that?

Yeah but I've got him now scrolling his log of posts to find evidence of times he actually used an article for something. He is showing posts that look either AI or opinion based....So this should be fun. Dude the last few back and forths we have had have led to you relying on anecdotal YouTube videos- including one with a skeleton sitting behind him in a basement. I'm not a liar- you are the worst kind of person because you think you are intelligent by listening to people who are dopey but say a lot of words. I'm glad you could help the skeleton guy earn a few cents on a video on youTube though.

Aspects of that are debatable....it's the full scale buying of all bad or all good I bristle at. Not all Trump's policies are good (or bad for that matter) and not all of Biden's are bad (or good for that matter)

That was the baffling part to me...I mean if you impose a 10% tariff a country/company isn't just going to eat that.

it doesn't matter....you'll just write posts that are small essays contradicting anything you said and trying to pretend you didn't rely on YouTube videos to make points.

Nope. I've seen your argument style here- so have others.

Look- I know you only accept videos from people on YouTube as evidence but just because someone doesn't go after a person vigorously doesn't mean they like that person. And just because they like to mock stupidity doesn't mean they are automatically on the other side of the argument. You just like to write long posts that lack any substance- everyone sees that. Additionally- you have no idea where my beliefs lie.

They might- but they will be enacted by a guy who poison pilled the tax cuts to end strategically in a year where he might not be President and who thinks adding a 10% tariff on goods from other countries will just mean "they pay us more money" and it won't just lead to the cost of goods going up at the consumer's expense.

What am I defending myself from exactly? There needs to be an emoji of something flying over someone's head for both the posts I quoted here.

Basically what I argued but the usual suspects of idiots here don't want to hear that

It is a bit ironic that the one thing that could save Biden yet is his VP candidate who know one is talking about as being the President consideration if Joe drops. It's additionally ironic because after Barack Obama's bad performance against Romney in the first debate in 2012- it was Joe who pulled them back on truck by having GOP wunderkind Paul Ryan for dinner. Also, the big talk of Biden in 2008 was would he come across as too condescending to Sarah Palin and instead people felt he was very respectful to her even with her being overmatched politically. Can whomever Trump brings in as his VP have the same touch towards Kamala Harris?

You guys are bad at this conspiracy stuff.. Wouldn't the move be for MSNBC and CNN to not mention Trump's performance because it will be easier to replace Biden if they keep reminding people how bad he was

So you just watched and didn't do anything to check into what they said and I guess just stared at the TV glow drooling?

Chardonnay? Hahaha. Dude I'm a picnic beer drinker. I ain't drinking chardonnay. And of course it would be Horseman....a "life winner" on his third screen name here (at least) I said multiple places where they lied on topics. You've got nothing. Quit while you're behind.

You are a dummy who doesn't understand anything. Piss off rent-a-cop

Ah so you have nothing to refute what I said.. That's what I figured. At least you stuck around for a few posts instead of the last time where I asked you a direct question and you ran and hid for weeks

You didn't answer my questions. Also, glad you are buddies with whatever person is now posting under probably their 4th account as "Jose M"

More interesting that watching the debate because I didn't have to watch the debate. Ellipsis is how they filled in some things I would guess you are referring to as "incoherent mumbling." But there were also spots where they just did it verbatim. It doesn't read any better than I imagine it looked live. I did fact check things. Trump lied on: multiple things related to January 6th, multiple things on taxes, climate change, abortion issues, Russia, Biden calling people "super predators", stuff related to migrants, "we had the greatest economy in history", the George Floyd protests. Biden lied about insulin price caps, what Trump said about bleach, military deaths under him, and the historians calling Trump the worst president ever. Those are the big ones I noted. I didn't get into all the little things so 9 to 4 in favor of Trump lies (with putting all the individual lies in one heading). So yeah- almost twice as many from Trump. But apparently that is "equitably" to some here.

You were able to read a sentence? Good for you. Progress. Soon you'll be able to stay on a topic and maybe even post a link supporting something you say. I know it took 5 years and people with an IQ of 40 advance faster than you but you are getting there. 1.) If Biden had been lucid and crushed Trump last night would you switch your vote? 2.) Are you happy these are the two best options we have for President?

"You loose"? I did watch 5 minutes. I know this will be foreign to you but I read stuff about the debate and read through a transcript of the debate. Reading is something people do where they find a story and sound out letters in patterns that form words. HTH I would imagine a strong portion of that 5% is moving from Biden to Trump. I would also say it's June- that can change yet. But without breaking down the numbers fully I would say there is a good chance a 5% swing could change the election result.

If person A lies 40 times and person B lies 15 times- that isn't equitably. Sorry. it just isn't

Two things to note- a poll last night said only 5% of people were changing their vote based on the debate- it didn't indicate which side the person was moving to. 14% said they were reconsidering- but obviously not changing yet. 81% said they were unchanged....so the debate did really very little damage and with the 4th coming and Trump's sentencing hearings- it won't last long in the media. For Democrats though there might be benefit in Biden losing to clear their deck because they have a deeper bench ready to go either as early as November or in 4 years- just off the top of the head you have Newsom, Whitmer, and Shapiro. I'm not sure who is there on the Republican side and I'm not sure any of the names listed as being Trump's running mate carry the excitement for the GOP. Like losing this year might (almost) guarantee you the Presidency from 2028-2036. Winning now means almost assuredly Harris has a lead in for the nom in 2028 and I don't think she carries excitement in or out of the party.

DEI as a concept is fine. Where it runs into issues is how companies, and individual HR departments, employ it. By that I mean- if you are using it to find the best candidates regardless of age, gender, sexual orientation, etc you are doing the right thing. If you are using it to eliminate out a subset of people and then finding the best person excluding that group- well you are doing it wrong.

They did not lie anywhere close to equitably last night. But again- to people like you who are dyed in the wool it doesn't matter. You slurp what you get.

Seriously....RLLD has gone down this road three times and never once given anything other than videos and said "There..evidence"