Sean Mooney

Again you have a weird way to try and hit on me man. I shared my facts. You shared stupid outrage.

What's a matter....don't like when someone takes a shot at what you do? SOFT!!

Good thing you aren't in active duty anymore. I'd hate for our military to have people as soft as you in it

Keep running from the facts dude. And make sure to clean up the mess you left from all those tears you've shed

Eternal Shiny: "What are we up to now? 10% 15% 20% GTFO" Me: Here are stats that show it is only 7% actually and that 18 million LGBT is miniscule when compared to at least 222 million straight people in the US. Eternal Shiny: "WAHHHH! THat's 9 times more than our military and we need to protect the world you dumb M'fer." Me: "Actually- 6.1% of the military identify as LGBT which is pretty in line with the 7% in the general population and we are still ruling the world." Eternal Shiny: "I can't deal with facts...you dumb m'fer....ARGGHHHHH!" (His head explodes into a mess of jelly even moreso than it already is)* *I may be exaggerating that head exploding part "

I'll help you out by bolding the facts Not enough for you? Now do what you always do- make a gay joke, say someone else is lying, call them a dumb m'fer and say "GTFO"....but most importantly- your real go to move- cry like a b!tch when you are proven wrong.

I've never made a stand against a company because they do something I agree or disagree with. But I'm also not a pissy pants baby like you. I get why you hate facts and everything- you aren't intelligent enough to understand them. And declaring that I create strawmen after you basically spent pages arguing against things I never said in the Disney thread is pretty rich.

Not to mention that in the midst of this boycott they ran their thing again with Busch Light where they do the John Deere cans with money going to farmers in America. The guy who does nothing but make gay jokes on a fantasy football message board really wants that apology.

Nope I'm not....but I'm also not the one who is using a presumption to make my point. I used facts.

You are crying when factual numbers are presented to you and I "ignore facts". Okay dude- look you were way off, got proven wrong, your piss poor military strawman argument got crushed too. Go cry in your pillow. I'm gonna bet you aren't really talking to a lot of "confused girls" about this. And the whole "species won't exist" argument is hyperbole of the highest degree. The 222 million number is higher too. Feels high but . I will say though- I'm not in a district where it would be a representative case sample size. But I'd say maybe about 3% of the school population is LGBT That is out of like 1200 kids. Not even close. Those would 100% be the type of people I would make fun of though. But keep crying and twisting about the numbers proving you wrong.

There are 258,300,000 million adults in the US as of the 2020 census. Gallup is where the percentage numbers are from. You're statement was "We are now at 10%? 15%? 20%? GTFO." You are wrong. You said "We used to be at 2-4%." We haven't been at 2% in a considerably long time. Furthest I can find back in a short glance is 3.5% in 2012. It was 4.5% in 2017 and 5.6% in 2020. And yes 18 million is small considering it is only 7% of the population. There are 222 million straight people and another 16 million that might be straight but choose not to say (and yes there could be some in that 18 million who are gay and choose not to say.) 18 million of 222 million is 8%. So yes- it is a small number. There are 1.4 million people in the US military. Of that 1.4 million- 6.1% identify as LGBT according to the Rand corporation which is roughly 86 thousand people. So 7% of the adults in the US identify as LGBT...6.1% of the military identify as LGBT...that seems to match up pretty well. In fact- for fun let's say the military had 258,300,000 million people in it- at 6.1% that would mean there are about 16 million LGBT people in the military. Those numbers are not far off. So apparently- the US military "the strongest, most dominant force in the world of 6 billion population," is still all that despite a similar ratio of LGBT identifying individuals to the overall population ratio of LGBT identifying individuals. Looks like you the dumb m'fer. And you come off as a bigoted azzhole to boot.

What so he can create a 6th screen name to post under? He is a pretty big defect in humanity.

As of 2022- 86% of adults in the US identify as straight or heterosexual, 7% offer no opinion, and 7% identify as LGBT. That means roughly 222 million people identify as straight and 18 million identify as LGBT with another 18 million declining to offer their sexual orientation. Yet we can people saying things like "The LGBT are invading schools to convert kids." or the most bizarre slippery slope rant one could give while comparing it to the plot of a 90's Marvel comic book movie. This is the epitome of a bad faith argument. And when people are saying things like: "The only reason a same-sex couple should be ever be able to adopt is if they LITERALLY cannot find a normal sex couple." You are dealing with someone who is a straight up azzhole. And these idiotic thoughts being thrown out there are the exact reason why we have these months and programs. Because the idea is to say "Hey it's okay these people exist. You don't have to agree with them but be cool to them."

Look when you are crazy you have no time for facts.

There are numerous causes businesses choose to do that for one reason or another groups will try to fight against. And I mean people railed when Skittles took all the color out of the bags for Pride month. But again- you don't know who Mulvaney is. I didn't know who it was. I'd have no reason to. This was viewed by someone who was looking for something to be upset about.

Sure..No explicit or implicit mentions of one another. Starting now

Here comes my stalker.....

But again- it wasn't something to be sold. It wasn't anything they were advertising to anything outside of a niche group. I will make a safe bet you don't follow Dylan Mulvaney on social media. I'd imagine RLLD doesn't either. They made a move that has been made countless times and for whatever reason it caused a backlash this time. I get what they were trying to do but it became a mountain because a bunch of people who probably had no idea who Mulvaney was before this were able to be riled up over it.

No I'm not giving him permission to do it. I'm saying what they felt was "right" is not acceptable and regardless of people saying it or not isn't going to necessarily change them. I agree people in his circle need to be better about heading it off. And there needs to be a clear line to him as to why it should not be done.

Again though- let's be honest about this....almost any company is going to cast their net as wide as possible to try and bring in consumers. What Bud Light did is not that different from any other company. What pissed people off is they wanted to be outraged about this. To me this isn't a matter of "right or wrong"....Anheuser Busch runs actual campaigns for all types of organizations- notably farmers of America with their Busch Light brand. This was a can made for an influencer to try and appeal their beer to young 20 somethings. Whether you personally agree with what transgenders are or not you can't fault the business move.

Let's keep in mind- this was Bud Light just making cans for a specific person that there was no intention to sell. It was basically "Hey transgenders- you want beer, drink Bud Light." They didn't advertise it, they didn't promote it to anyone explicitly, they weren't selling the cans....and the only people who are legally able to buy beer are 21 year old ADULTS. This isn't "let's protect kids"- this is "We want to tell everyone how to live and what to do." Additionally, the only reason anyone knows about it is Mulvaney posted it (most likely either in an implicit or explicit agreement) and someone viewed it and threw a hissy fit over it. I'd venture a guess that even here a majority of us are not following Dylan Mulvaney on social media and would've had no idea about this had someone not been cruising the Internet for things to be outraged about- either in a professional TV station setting, or in someone's personal life.

Comparing not buying beer to war? Seriously delusional.

Especially because he is 100% guilty of that.

The bolded part I will agree with. I would also add he isn't all that dissimilar to a lot of men his age who don't see anything wrong with what they are doing in portraying what they think are normal interactions. Mainly because they were born in the 30's and that's "how it was done" for a long time.

Watching numbers of videos and following accounts hoping to see a grown adult pinch a girl's nipple or sniffing a girl.......kind of sounds like someone with a weird fetish.